I'm stoned, but does this make sense?

I think you lost your way to /v/

OP here. So is there a deeper origin of this concept? Can you think of a more accurate description of modern development?

Since this thread sucks, does anyone know a place where people would find this interesting? I know it's not /v/

dude weed lmao

>>59496677
$30 for a gram? Sure bro!

Yes, you're describing the current state of game development.
The fuck is your question?

> Consoles became RISC-based, finally capable of supporting
reusable, high level languages

what

x86 is CISC and supports any high level language you want. Language support has literally nothing to do with instruction sets

>>59496950
It can be architecture dependent though witches very similar. Lots of games need to have atomicity support that might not be guaranteed by an instruction set for example

>>59496656
It's not anything new, if you need to shit post this go find /adgd/

>>59496923
The question is do you have a better one, and what will it be replaced with?
>>59496950
I should of said the transition. Most 16-bit games were in asm. Well polished titles only had luxary of C.

>>59496440
>consoles became more powerful
>PCs became more powerful
>with more power, devs can now use bloated frameworks

makes sense to me, OP. Now fuck off back to /sci/'s billionth thread about drugs