cpuz bench thread

File: CPU-Z.png (61KB, 814x400px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 814x400px

The CPU-Z benchmark for some reason does not like this Xeon and will not properly detect the other 8 threads.

>>59490995
Try manually setting the thread count

>>59490995
>cpu-z 1.73
have you tried it on the newer 1.78 version of cpu-z?

>>59490995
isn't that an engineering sample?

File: Cinebench R15.png (1MB, 1444x876px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1444x876px

>>59491017
Tried manually setting to 16 threads, still no go. Utilization is still limited to 8 threads, one on each core.

>>59491028
Look to the benchmarking side for the version, I was a lazy fuck and composted a screenshot of the recent version next to a CPU-Z screenshot from an older version.

>>59491029
Yep, and I still havent figured out whether its the board being derp (Biostar Tpower X79, apparently it acts strange with all chips because its Biostar) or if its the chip being an ES (release stepping mind you) doing it.

Works fine with cinebench and other benchmarks though. Just not CPU-Z

File: cpuz.png (28KB, 404x403px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 404x403px

i don't know what else to say

>>59491067
you could by posting the bench.

File: meme.png (167KB, 243x363px) Image search: [Google]

167KB, 243x363px

i'm waiting for my x370 meme motherboard to ship so i can put my 1700 x meme processor in .

>>59490995
This looks correct to me, what is exactly not properly detected?

>>59490977
>poo theme

>>59491220
windows itself is poo so it blends

File: cpuz.png (55KB, 810x404px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 810x404px

>>59491160

what does this mean

File: boundandgagged.png (1MB, 999x681px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 999x681px

>>59490977
>synthetic benchmarks

>>59491237
you must have a golden chip to hit 4.5ghz stable with only 1.32v's.

>>59491257

yeah it's not bad

File: 2_cute.jpg (28KB, 74x75px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 74x75px

>>59491239
Irregardless of the type, since they are all using the same and comparing it is a valid comparison.

>>59491257
4.5GHz at 1.32V on skylake isn't good

>>59491257
Bullshit. That's an entirely normal voltage for 4.5GHz.

>>59490977
$70 BIN on ebay
http://valid.x86.fr/bench/v6thvg/4

File: woo gained 200 points in multithread.png (41KB, 822x409px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 822x409px

Im not sure why i dont gain more, considering its running at 4500mhz..

>>59491284
>irregardless
I bet you could care less as well you southern hillbilly.

>>59491503
What about background process? kill everything in the taskbar and shut down your av.

>>59491528
No AV on the PC, i closed the browser and everything else beforehand, and winderps was using 0-2% cpu on idle, with the cpu idling too, so at 1600mhz there.

>>59491237
>what does this mean
it means 4.5gz>4.2
kaby is just a rebrand anyway

File: updated cpu-z.png (44KB, 822x414px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 822x414px

>>59491528
>>59491503
I updated CPU-z and it gave me a higher multi thread score

still seems a little low, considering the OC

>>59491209
CPU-Z's integrated benchmark is not utilizing all 16 threads on this CPU for some reason. It will only use 8 no matter how many or how few i have selected.

>>59491584
Seems about right

>>59491705
maybe, hard to tell without others with a 2500k on 4500mhz tho

File: 4-7_kaby.png (10KB, 401x404px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 401x404px

>>59491584


undervolting and overclocking, take my time. currently at 4.7Ghz 1.175V as per BIOS, aiming for aircooled 5 but not willy to go past 1.28V. We'll see where it goes. Need to reseat my colour and try some new paste at some point oo

>>59491757
agreed, but >>59491430 1800/[email protected] on ivy

>>59491808
see, thats what makes me thing mines a little low, 1699 ST on 4500mhz vs 1800+ on yours with 4ghz.

guess ill have to upgrade next generation
..buuuut windows 10 sucks massive ass so im fucked

LEAVE MEMES ALONE !

>>59491844
With a little bit of effort windows 7 will run on Ryzen. Maybe not 100% optimally, but it will run well enough (and if the benchies are to be believed better than win10)

>>59491873
Yeah, i was thinking Zen+ though, or coffee lake.

depends whats best for the money at that time

>>59491844
what board/bios settings?

>>59491944
Asrock Z68 Extreme4
offset voltage -0.0002 or something, it the first - one
Turbo boost +0.004v or something
PLL level 2 iirc

File: cpuz.jpg (52KB, 403x402px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 403x402px

>>59490977

File: 2017-03-20 10_28_44.png (19KB, 442x433px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 442x433px

>tfw your $330 AMD Ryzen R7 1700 CPU at stock (3,2GHz on all cores) beats a $1000 Intel 6900K at 3,2GHz.

Intel is even worse than Apple when it comes to pricing KEK

File: intel senior engineer.jpg (22KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 480x360px

>>59492161

ahiiiiiiiii

AHIIIIIIII!!!

File: 2017-03-20 10_26_00.png (19KB, 474x442px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 474x442px

>>59492161

and compared to Intel's gaymen CPU

look at that fucking multithreaded annihilation at a 1GHz deficiency!!!

>>59492161
Single thread is low though.

File: 1486863742229.png (8KB, 473x500px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 473x500px

>>59492161

>intel has double the fucking TDP (140W vs R7 1700's 65W and still loses

jesus, and Intel's CPU costs 3 times the price, and you need an expensive X99 motherboard aswell. You can run any ryzen processor on fucking 80 bucks B350 boards

>>59492161
oy vey shut it down!

File: 2017-03-20 10_43_01.png (20KB, 486x440px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 486x440px

and what about Intel's $1600 6950X which has 10 Core and 20 threads?

We are talking about a price difference of fucking $1270 USD holy shit

>>59492266
so sad its pretty bad for games though, wish the 1600 had higher clocks with 6/12 cores

and none of that CCX bullshit going on

but nope, maybe next generation, if they fix that its gonna wreck shit though.

>>59492180
Why is everybody recommending i7's for gaming now? HT has always been worthless for gaming

>>59491962
Here is a good guide.
http://www.overclock.net/t/1198504/complete-overclocking-guide-sandy-bridge-ivy-bridge-asrock-edition

I don't have those options but.
All spread spectrum off
power saving off
LLC High
Max Current 130%
+ offset
give me best benchmarks. I have some other tweaks but that is to stabilize bclk and oc ram past xmp

>>59492310
its finally optimized, somewhat

>>59492334
yeah my ram is 1866mhz CL9
power saving also off, LLC Medium (level 2)
max current 500w
also using offset.

Oh, and it hits 65c under heavy load with a Phanteks PH14CT or whatever its called.

>>59492334
>>59492343
Ill add, my OC is stable, just seems to score low for 4500mhz is all.

File: 2771ad6a4711ac21091b7b2823dffc2a.png (241KB, 731x966px) Image search: [Google]

241KB, 731x966px

Engineering Sample e5-2683v3. Paid $200 for two of them from my work. Currently waiting on ECC ram to arrive to put them both in a dual socket board I got. This is with only one cpu in an Asus x99a/usb3.1

File: 1453865711727804.png (33KB, 218x210px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 218x210px

>>59492161
>>59492180
DELET

File: 1488371469396.jpg (1MB, 1845x1923px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1845x1923px

>>59492293
>less than 5% difference in average FPS
>Ryzen has better minimum FPS and reportedly smoother and less "stuttery" gaming experience

shill get out

>>59492469
its actually less smooth from what ive read.

Shill pls.

File: CPU-Z bench.png (37KB, 809x405px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 809x405px

Single core performance seems to be low?

>>59492499
>4.8ghz 6/12 core/thread

Jesus christ that must wreck face in pretty much anything.

File: cpu-z.jpg (29KB, 416x418px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 416x418px

>>59490977
1700X here... CPU-Z or speccy are the only progtams that wont run anymore for some reason it freezes at storage, maybe because I'm running RAID

http://valid.x86.fr/fs1phm

howd I do? at least i beat an i7-4790k

>>59492293

7700k 5ghz. min 98, max 144
1800x 4.1gz. min 121, max 132

aka, the amd cpu has higher frametimes and less stuttering.

aka its the better buy.

>>59493080
you mean lower frametimes

>>59493080
In probably a supremely cherry picked case

Listen, i want the amd cpus to be amazing too
which they are, just not for gaming right now.

now imagine the zen+ with the issues they have fixed, maybe with a bit more oc headroom.

Sides, at most id get the 1700, 1600, 1500 or even 1400, im not sure why i would want to pay extra for the x versions.

File: ns55xy.png (38KB, 403x402px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 403x402px

>>59492974 v2 howd I do?

http://valid.x86.fr/ns55xy

note: this is unstable and crashes after a couple hours once my shitty air cooler starts overheating

File: 2724.hermit-crab-plastic-f1772.jpg (343KB, 600x489px) Image search: [Google]

343KB, 600x489px

>>59493148
hello fellow fx sufferer

File: OhIXt36.png (368KB, 613x595px) Image search: [Google]

368KB, 613x595px

>>59493214

suffer not young crab

once you are inside amd sso you will see the light

File: mister crabby.png (27KB, 400x397px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 400x397px

>>59493235
i have a 1700x with the motherboard shipping soon i hope.

>>59493282

ur instructions tell me ur a special snowflake contact if u want in

why 1700x not man enough to go full cheapskate with 1700 or 1500 series?

>>59493147

this was an overall test.

and most reviews show the exact same thing. even tho its 10-20 fps lower, its still has the min/max closer to each other compared to the 7700k.

and with recent bios updates, and new reviews are showing the cpus closer and closer to each other when it comes to normal average fps.

So i dont understand this whole "not good for gaming stuff"

>>59493330


i don't even use virtualization

>>59493346

Typical ricer. I work http://www.microcad.ca/ use the searchbox for special stuff if you know what to look for. Ex: we sell HP NVDIMMs

>>59493378
i appreciate it but i don't know what the fuck you are talking about .

i just build computers , with minimal knowledge

>>59493148

WTF they FX space heaters are only 125W? Intel's 6900K is 140W, now those must be fucking mini-furnaces holy shit

>>59491503
>Multiplier 16 - 59
w-whats up with that?

>>59494081
thats the multiplier the motherboard supports

>>59494124
Hm ok? My OC'ed 2500K shows 16 - 42 and it indeed runs at 4.2 GHz (even though the motherboard also could do more)

File: Udklip.png (15KB, 399x403px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 399x403px

>>59490977

File: running stock clocks lmao.png (64KB, 646x577px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 646x577px

>>59494139
Probably just the way asrock does it

File: lmao.png (117KB, 834x415px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 834x415px

>>59494084
Ayyy lmao

File: cpu-z.png (72KB, 832x418px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 832x418px

>>59490977
AyyMD housefire

>>59494081
My old asus does this when multi is set to all cores. It displays true max when set to by core though.
>>59494149
>ivy
my person of color.
>>59492886
>9k
>>59494383
For what is essentially a 2c/4t, a little over half of a 7700k isn't bad.

File: Capture.png (15KB, 403x402px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 403x402px

what the shit

File: 4690k 4.7.png (60KB, 850x419px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 850x419px

not bad for an i5

File: CPU Z.png (58KB, 830x413px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 830x413px

>>59492499
>4.8Ghz
That's pretty impressive.
As for that single core, well my 5820k gets 1900~ at 4.2Ghz so dunno, doesn't seem extremely low in comparison to me.

One day I need to test how high my CPU overclocks.
These are god tier chips.

File: CPUz.png (46KB, 833x415px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 833x415px

I am not upgrading till games fully utilize at least 6 cores

File: sup.png (17KB, 403x402px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 403x402px

>>59499718
and my secondary @4.3

>>59491314
Yeah, my 4790k hits 4.6 on stock voltages.

File: sproing.gif (2MB, 488x291px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 488x291px

>>59499516
You'll be fine with that CPU for the next 5 years at least.

>>59499718
What the hell is that thing?

File: untitled.jpg (46KB, 408x407px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 408x407px

>>59499912

>>59500280
You should get a better chip if possible. There are plenty of Athlon XP chips on fleabay.

File: 4545re.png (88KB, 861x439px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 861x439px

>>59492720

Thanks for posting I was wondering how I would stack up to a 1700X. Soon I hope to join you.

File: cpuz.jpg (311KB, 806x402px) Image search: [Google]

311KB, 806x402px

pleb reporting in

File: better_than_bulldozer.png (63KB, 834x414px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 834x414px

At least it's better than fucking first gen bulldozer.

File: 2670.png (98KB, 814x400px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 814x400px

16c/32t monster reporting in.
Defend yourselves, corelets.

Now that Direct X12 games are going to be out, and multiple cores are better supported do you think multicore setups will become the high end for gaming?

>>59501539
Yes I think we'll start to see parallelization be implemented more now that 4/8 intel chips are the most common purchase because every gayming laptop comes with an i7 and normies are idiots and buying laptops by the pallet

>>59501721
i meant more like 6950x insterad of 7700k for gaming

>>59501851
?

>>59492474
Source?

File: tmp_26620-1700X-Stock688343046.png (17KB, 403x402px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 403x402px

Dayum 1700X, you scary.
2933MHz 15-15-15-36
Asus Crosshair VI, 0902

>>59501851

Yes, higher core count will outshine CPUs like 7700k when they start utilizing those extra cores, which will most likely happen fairly soon with these rising core counts on CPUs all across the spectrum.

>>59500859
>that single threaded performance
a shitty ass fx 8370 has stronger single threaded than that.

>>59500707
amd's phenom 2 where better than their successor, first generation faildozer. deneb was goat.

>>59492266
>filthy pooshit subhuman using CPUz which is known for being biased in favor of poozen because of cache
In any real world application, rypoo gets BTFO. If you like synthetic benchmarks so much, try sysmark/passmark.

File: cpubench.png (111KB, 825x423px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 825x423px

bumpin

>>59493335
>intel gets 170 fps
>amd gets 160 fps
OMG AMD IS ABSOLUTE HORSESHIT. INTEL THE WINNER! AMD CAN'T GAME AT ALL. SHITTY FRAME!

BUY INTEL!

>did i do good my jewish master?

File: LLCMED_+OFST_ADD_TV_020.png (34KB, 412x412px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 412x412px

C states all on now, lowered llc and raised additional turbo voltage. Seems stable so far and has the same voltage under load as before but lower idle and better temps.

https://valid.x86.fr/e5h92j

Would it be worth it to try and sell my 4x4 1600mhz ram and get 2x8 2133+? 1866 cas 10 is as good as it gets within intel spec.