are OLED computer monitors the best type of computer monitor?

>>59490688
No.
No not for PC monitors

reason; burn in and latency

>>59491294
painful

>>59491294

https://www.gamerant.com/bioware-mass-effect-4-new-next-gen-game

Montreal was given the keys to the porsche and crashed the car in the ditch. The post mortum finger pointing will be interesting.

File: oled.jpg (31KB, 649x366px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 649x366px

>>59490688
They're great for watching cardoons. I love the OLED!

>>59491319
4u

>>59491871
you mean he's a big guy

>>59491898
shit this wasn't part of my plan

>>59491287
idiot

>>59491959
you really convinced me with those hot opinions

>>59491287
Is the latency bad though? And the burn-in issue is constantly being improved. I don't know how good it is now, but I probably still wouldn't recommend it to a NEET staring at his display at least 10 hours a day.

>>59490688
OLED has very vibrant colours and great contrast, but the colours are actually inaccurate (compared to good LCD). And as >>59491287 mentioned, they do have burn in problem.


>want to search for some info on OLED colour accuracy
>all the hits look like adverts or click baits

>>59492038
it may be inaccurate but we don't like them because of the vibrant colours. we like them because they're capable of displaying a high level of detail. the inaccurate colours are the trade-off

>>59492038
>>59492058

>but the colours are actually inaccurate

It's not down to the technology, it's down to the manufacturer purposefully going for vibrant colours instead of proper calibration

Sony makes 4k OLED broadcast monitors. By definition, they absolutely have to be colour accurate.