the patrician's choice in OS and DE is gnome3 with freeBSD.

>>59477695
>the cuck's choice
ftfy

>>59477695
>gnome 3.0.2
>BETA2 FreeBSD
>rainbow-runner
>nl
outdated cuck faggot kanker

>>59477912
>6 years ago
>outdated

>>59477695
>GNOME 3
nah
>FreeBSD
I use it on my server. The days of having a fully featured UNIX workstation are gone. Which is a shame too because Clang/LLVM is pretty nice, especially with anti-GPL Applebux funding it.

File: 3a7.jpg (77KB, 680x680px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 680x680px

>>59477930
>nah

>>59478431
If I wanted an Aqua like experience on UNIX, I'd use Aqua on UNIX, also known as macOS.

>>59478463
UNIX and darwin are as different as linux and windows

>>59478475
How the hell are they different? Darwin is UNIX.

File: 850px-Unix_timeline.en.svg.png (42KB, 850x610px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 850x610px

>>59478496

Post wallpaper please.

>>59478506
Your picture literally refutes your own argument. Dotted lines show UNIX-like systems while solid lines show actual UNIX code in work. Also, if you actually read the article you grabbed that chart from, you'd realize Darwin is UNIX.
>Darwin is an open-source Unix operating system released by Apple Inc. in 2000.

File: apple_unix_ad.jpg (401KB, 1976x1202px) Image search: [Google]

401KB, 1976x1202px

>>59478463
Best(only) commercial consumer UNIX in the market today.

>>59478630
I know that's a magazine scan but it always ticks me off because the right page is darker than the left page.

>>59478724
>austism

>>59478749
Welcome to /g/, please leave.

>>59478724
I wish I had the original too.

>>59478506
lel i never knew openbsd was born from netbsd

>>59477695

can someone give me a basic gestalt on BSD? is it basically just for gnu/linux users who think its become too mainstream and have to find something more obscure? or are there legitimate reasons to switch?

so i see you're running gahnohme

xdDDDDDDDdd :DDDDDD

>>59479565
bsd is attractive for embedded shit because of it's permissive license (BSD allows you to close it up and don't give a shit).

It also used to have a better networking stack then Linux, but I don't know whether this stands true nowadays.
I remember reading that as of today the difference is not that big anymore.

OpenBSD is attractive to purism autists and FBI backdoor enthusiasts.

but yeah, people switch when they get bored/they feel their e-penis isn't big enough

>>59480164
reminder that freebsd is on the CIA's list

>>59477695
How does this even work? I thought GNOME 3 had a dependency on systemd.

>>59479565
BSD is older than Linux and was only second to Solaris for servers, it always makes me laugh when people say stuff like that given that BSD is older and was way more mainstream, it still is popular for commercial products, the idea that someone would jump from Linux to BSD with the assumption that BSD is less mainstream is hilarious.

There's actual reasons to switch but they are becoming fewer and fewer as people reimplement/clone them for other systems.