Desktop Thread

>>59476946
How do I get it? Any good torrents or can I get a clean ISO and then "activate" it afterwards? Does it have the features of Win10 Pro or is it more stripped down than Home?

>>59476946
>but Winbloze 10 "insert special snowflake edition no one is ever going to get their hands on legitimately" is the legitimate successor to Windows 7

no. Shill on somewhere else.

>>59476968
It automatically activates if you install from The Pirate Bay as the torrent ISO conveniently auto activates with KMS built-in. You don't even need to install Rufus as it's including in the torrent's folder. Once the bootable USB or external hard drive prompts with the installation, select pre-activated in the Windows prompt and you are done.

>>59476968
It has way more features than Pro, most of them are networking-related.

>>59476968
It doesn't have Cortana, Windows Store, any of the Windows 8/10 app shit. It just comes with the Windows accessories carried over from Windows 10, except for Windows Photo Viewer and Windows Media Player (you need to install programs for these, such as Irfan and VLC). It also comes with many features like >>59477419 said.

>>59477620
>carried over from Windows 10
Meant to say Windows 7.

File: 1484940503313.png (237KB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

237KB, 2560x1440px

>>59476946
>Windows10 Enterprise N 2016 LTSB is the legitimate successor to Windows 7
No, it isn't.

>>59477642
In terms of accessibility, yes. In terms of "privacy", Windows 7 isn't.

Yes, it is.

File: 1484942736534.gif (370KB, 485x500px) Image search: [Google]

370KB, 485x500px

>>59477705
It's a bugfest W10 LTSB. nowhere near 7's stability.

>>59476946
>Enterprise N 2016 LTSB
does the UI actually make sense in this version or is it still a retarded inconsistent mishmash of broken Win32 and Metro?

>>59478011
Windows 10's UI has always made sense. If you can't understand something simple, you're retarded. It's as simple as that.

File: windows-10-menus_.jpg (88KB, 1024x576px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 1024x576px

>>59478045
granted, it's a bit better now, but it's still a piece of inconsistent shit

>>59478065
>consistency is key
You do realize that things should change depending on the context, right?

Or are you autistic and do you prefer everything to stay the same?

>>59478077
wait, are you talking about the fact that context menu has different options depending on where you click?
I hope not, because that would mean you're retarded

I was talking about how menus have a different style in different parts of the OS.

>are you autistic and do you prefer everything to stay the same?
I prefer an uniform look throughout the whole OS. If that makes me an autist then I guess I am one.