AMO (Mozilla add-on store) is now allowing any star reviews with no feedback from mobile users with no account needed. Add-ons are now receiving a mass of review spam with no valuable feedback for developers and interested users.
Source: https://discourse.mozilla-community.org/t/massive-review-spam-from-anonymous-users/14499
Daily reminder that while Mozilla keeps doing shit and removing features, it now funds an entire diversity department: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Diversity_and_Inclusion_Strategy#Our_Team
>>59470723
Plans for letting this happen on the desktop version as well in the future:
>We're supporting blank reviews now. The recent ones come from the mobile site, which is the first one to support this. The desktop site will support it in the future as well.
https://github.com/mozilla/addons-server/issues/4964
AMO reviews will become as relevant as the ones in the Chrome Webstore.
As an add-on developer I am seriously considering to stop using AMO if this will continue.
>>59470723
OH WOW ITS THE LE EBIL KARLTURAL MARXISTS SJEWS!!!! XDXDDXD
>>59470790
(You)
>>59470790
>>>/reddit/
Who fucking cares.
>>59470810
(You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You)
advertisers don't get it. Mobile Internet users have the attention span of goldfish. Once companies that advertise on these platforms realize their profits are not going up, mobile ads will crash,
>>59470790
>OP shows you the existence of something
>proceed to bury your head in the sand while being proud
wew, hope that was bait.
>>59470870
Are you mentally retarded or just a fucking idiot?
>>59470723
> AMO > NoScript > User Reviews
>Rating: 1/5 stars
>It is not working on mah gaululxy s9 edge X( Now is stuck im a boatloop and haevt o retun it!!1 dev's an idiot, reomen's not installin it
>>59470723
When ESR 45 dies I'm done with Firefox.
>tfw you hate chrome
>tfw firefox just gets worse every fucking update
>edge has barely any extensions and will probably tell my family that I jerk off to gay midget clown porn
NO GOOD BROWSERS REEE
>>59471871
>edge
>using winblows 10 in the first place
every browser is telling your family that you jerk off to gay midget clown porn in this case
>>59471827
You are missing the potential for this to be much worse...
Be hold the future!
N0Script 5/5 stars. Malware inside.
No_Script 5/5 stars, malware inside
NoScript. 5/5 stars, malware inside
>>59471893
>>using winblows 10 in the first place
haha gotteeeeeem
>>59471827
Gotta say, that Jessica chick is kinda hot though.
>>59471930
>a nigger
>hot
i know it was bait, but still
>>59470723
>Diversity committee is women only
That's not how diversity works.
>>59470723
Good thing I use Waterfox
>>59471986
but muh oppression!
>>59470723
Eita porra! O Mao Tsé-Tung está vivo!
>>59471912
Add-ons still have to be reviewed my Mozilla before going on the site, retard.
>>59470723
how do you do that?
>>59470723
Why is tech filled with cucks?
What happened to people like Linus, and Eric S. Raymond being the norm?
How do we fix this?
>>59472447
because tech is centered in California, the land of cucks.
Seems to me that they want to ruin their own extensions page for when they reach Fx57, so they can start from scratch and remove all legacy extensions in one step.
It doesn't matter if Mozilla is shit because you can always clone Firefox if you dislike the direction it's going.
Free software wins again
Yeah software should avoid political affiliation.
But I don't know what you expected from open source software?
>>59470723
It seems weird that their diversity team is all women. Doesn't seem very diverse to me.
>>59472929
>mansplaining
>>59470723
Obviously the bugs are the fault of the diversity team through some tortured chain of logic instead of...just being bugs like it is 99.999% of the time.
Stay mad, /pol/.
>>59473024
The point is that they remove stuff claiming that it'd take resources to keep them, while using donation money for political projects instead of hiring some competent programmers.
>>59473024
>dude poles lmao
They are shitting up every new releases. They are trying to be chrome these days.
>>59474008
/thread
>still using commiefox
>>59474008
>Source: My ass
>>59470723
>This is intentional. We think this will encourage more people to rate add-ons, and will reduce the instances of written reviews that don't say much or end up being deleted because of the way they're worded.
They're really living in a bubble, dayum.
>>59474008
They hire programmers though.
>>59472861
It does matter. Mozilla has a huge team that supports Firefox. Am I supposed to take the fork in a new direction alone?
>>59470723
>it now funds an entire diversity department
They're late to the party.
>>59470790
Damn you, Cultural Marx!