So, this is the only usable browsers for smart /g/ people?

>>59465470
Chromium is botnet. Use Firefox.

>not iridium

>>59465486
Firefox is shit. Back to Chromium.

If you don't build your own browser, you are being spied.

>>59465493
Chromium is botnet. Use Firefox.

File: logo_chromium.png (57KB, 533x537px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 533x537px

>>59465470
ungoogled is literally the perfect browser

>>59465518
Why? Performance is subpar compared to Chromium and you know it.

File: Browsers.png (139KB, 824x720px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 824x720px

>>59465547
It has near identical performance.

>>59465558
> links random png whipped up in mspaint
> "LOOK I'M RIGHT BECAUSE THIS IMAGE WITH NO SOURCE SAYS SO"

>>59465558
Chromium should have a B

File: raj.jpg (355KB, 1532x2038px) Image search: [Google]

355KB, 1532x2038px

>>59465558
Firefox Nightly may be a lot more fluid than regular Firefox but Chromium/Chrome still runs circles around it

File: 1421291856549.png (152KB, 1045x580px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 1045x580px

>>59465558
Firefox is a botnet

>>59465547
Not on my PC. Firefox performs better than Chromium. Especially h/w video decoding, which is shite in Chrom*.

so, now ungoogled is the /g/ official browser...

>>59465529
>>59465669
>can't install extensions from the store
i cant live without autoscroller

>>59465694
wew

>>59465633
>i'm too retarded to use a user.js

>>59465694
I don't know, just building it.. but I'd guess you can install them. If you can install them on freaking vivaldi, why not on custom built chromium

>>59465470
Either Firefox Nighty or Firefox Aurora/Developer would do.

>>59465694
use the web store userscript, you're on /g/

>>59465694
yes you can

File: test.gif (608KB, 805x504px) Image search: [Google]

608KB, 805x504px

>>59465694
works on my manchine

>>59465470
Waterfox

>>59465470
>no updater
>usable

top kek

how the fug do i put extensions on ungoogled chrome?

>>59466668
>no updater
holy fuck you are retarded. why do you need to constantly update something that isnt broken?

>>59465633

> 1. Sends name of file you're downloading to Mozilla
If you're visiting downloadmoreram.org and you don't know better, checking the website can HELP YOU NOT GET INFECTED.

> 2. Every URL is sent to Mozilla for auto-completion purposes
It asks permission to enable autocomplete before you even use it.

> 3. Connects to Mozilla to download malicious URLs
[ citation needed ]

> 4. Asks you to login
CTRL+W. You'll never see the login page again.

> 5. Connects to website before you hit enter
That's why your pages load faster.

>>59465470

Link me up senpai

Why Firefox Nightly is god tier? Is it a meme?

>>59465621

I feel so happy for him...

Xombrero is awesome, use it!

>>59465490
Ungoogled contains all the iridium patches + more

I'm stoopid.
How I install ungoogled chromium in linoox?

>>59465490
hurr durr

>>59465490
>>59465694
>>59466716
ITT: morons too stupid and spoonfed to read the FAQ or README

File: 1453477480003.png (125KB, 320x315px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 320x315px

>ungoogled chrome
Do you really think the devs (all 1 of them) have audited the entire Chromium source code?

>>59467544
>implying source audits mean anything when they become invalid one commit later
>implying audit companies can be trusted

>>59465633
>>59467011
>asks you to log in
Can anyone explain what the big deal about this is? I only see it "asking" me as a shortcut on the new tab page and this can easely be removed.

>>59467350
No.

>>59465470
So how do you add stuff like UBlock, OP? Anyone?

File: 1487575471442.gif (1000KB, 500x207px) Image search: [Google]

1000KB, 500x207px

>>59465621
Good for him!

>>59467462
What distro? You;ll have to compile it manually, most likely.

>>59467544
Then which browser would you suggest? My impression is that ungoogled chromium is the best we've got. Plus it has mitigations against the browser inadvertently sending unsolicited data to Google by doing a URL replacement

>>59467614
Read the FAQ dumbass

File: godofrepeatingdigits.gif (11KB, 296x292px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 296x292px

Waterfox

>>59465470
>Intelligent
>UI designed for normies and impossible to modify

>>59467674
What advantages does this have over Iridium?

how do you know that the ungoogled chromium dev didn't implement his own botnet?

>>59467701
It has all the iridium patches and inox patches plus it's own extra mitigations ensuring that absolutely no data is being sent to third parties by the browser itself

>>59465558
no it doesn't. firefox takes significantly longer to open than chromium. i have the same amount of add-ons with both and yet chromium starts up pretty much instantly while firefox takes 5-10 seconds

>>59467726
You can read the patches yourself, there aren't really that many.

File: Screenshot_2017-03-18_16-42-03.png (14KB, 941x60px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 941x60px

>>59467726
They can barely handle the work as it is.

Ok, faggots, I'm going to try to compile this once more, the first time it failed. Should I get the -bundle package, or just the regular?

>>59466630
>>59467684
These

It's Firefox x64 without the telemetry and dumb shit like signed addons. Plus dev is based and keeping support for XUL passed 57. Waterfox is the best.

>>59467831
And dumb shit like certain video codecs, because the dev is a fucking turboautist who values the AESTHETIC of his code over its functionality.

I don't remember what it was, but I found out that it couldn't handle certain kinds of videos for no good technical reason and dropped it like a bad fucking habit.

File: Screenshot_2017-03-18_16-50-54.png (73KB, 799x440px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 799x440px

>>59467831
I'll give it a spin

>>59467859
Damn did I just fall for another /g/ meme?

What -exactly- does Chromium still send to Google?
Should I care if I don't use a Google account for anything?

>>59467785
I assume you're on Arch? The regular one is the best.

>>59465694
the first thing I did when I realized the web store didn't work in UC was google "how to manually install extensions"

use your brain

>>59467922
Forget I said >>59467859 - apparently the browser supports MSE & DASH now?

>>59468060
Why won't it let me any sites that have anything to do with Google, like ebay or amazon?

>>59467954
They tie your IP to your advertising ID. They track you wherever you go.

>>59468023
==> Starting build()...
==> Building...this will take a while...
2017-03-18 21:27:42,872 - INFO: Initialized default console logging handler
2017-03-18 21:27:42,872 - INFO: Using builder LinuxStaticBuilder
2017-03-18 21:27:42,873 - INFO: Directory build does not exist. Creating...
2017-03-18 21:27:42,873 - INFO: Directory build/sandbox does not exist. Creating...
2017-03-18 21:27:42,873 - INFO: Directory build/downloads does not exist. Creating...
2017-03-18 21:27:42,874 - INFO: Directory build/path_overrides does not exist. Creating...
2017-03-18 21:27:42,874 - INFO: Setting up environment overrides...
2017-03-18 21:27:42,874 - INFO: Checking Python 2 command...
2017-03-18 21:27:42,874 - INFO: No Python 2 command specified; testing with 'python'
2017-03-18 21:27:42,904 - ERROR: Unsupported Python version '3.6.0'

>>59468118
I've been using ungoogled chromium for a few months now, and I haven't had a single problem like that

>>59465978
this

>>59468143

sudo pacman -Sy python2

>>59468146
Maybe it's just Iridium, they won't even let me connect to anything remotely google, even google.com, for instance.

>>59465470
Sorry but I'm too intelligent to even consider a sub-120 browser like this

>>59468175
Are you sure you didn't block it in your hosts file or something? I don't think even iridium does that, but I might be wrong, I never used it.

>>59467755
They take an equal time to open on my PC. Around 5s each. The only way chromium would open instantly is if it runs on startup and gets loaded into RAM. In which case it's not a fair comparison anyway.

>>59468190
Well I just restarted the browser and it let me, so it might be a bit buggy, still. Problem is apparently on my end

File: Screenshot_2017-03-18_17-10-26.png (50KB, 575x338px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 575x338px

Well fugg

File: 2017-03-18-17:15:39-scrot.png (158KB, 1366x747px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 1366x747px

>2017
>not using a keyboard driven browser
>not just implementing all your meme extensions as browser features
tip top jokes

>>59468324

let me guess, that's a webkit based browser?

>>59468387
by default, but qutebrowser does work with the chromium-based QTWebEngine as well, which I use.

>>59465470
>He thinks it really is ungoogled

Nice bait OP.

>>59468599
>He thinks his shilling will work
You can test it with wireshark yourself. There are no third party connections.

>>59468675
there are no connections to google services in chromium either

>>59468706
You sure you want to keep claiming that?
https://github.com/nwjs/chromium.src/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=google.com

So I've installed it.
Now what addons should I get?

>>59468168
I already have it

File: Call of Muses.jpg (957KB, 1600x800px) Image search: [Google]

957KB, 1600x800px

>>59467544
ungoogled-chromium's patches weren't made by a single developer. Inox patches were made by gcarq, Iridium patches were made by the Iridium team.

Chromium is one of the most secure software ever made - the "audits" to be made here are to disable google connections because they don't respect the users.

ungoogled-chromium runs domain substitution on the whole source code before compiling. Then, in case the browser attempts to connect to a google domain, it blocks the connection and alerts the user.

You don't get more anti-google than that.

>>59467726
By compiling from the source. You don't have to read Chromium's source - check the patches and the Python scripts used to build it.

>>59467701
Why don't you go and read the fucking FAQ? Is called frequent asked questions for a reason, both of your questions were there.

File: Screen Shot 2017-03-18 at 5.55.44 PM.png (36KB, 383x269px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 383x269px

>>59468771
Wow look at all the botnet connections

>>59468899
Do you have a python2 command? If not, symbolically link the /bin/python2.7 binary to /usr/local/bin/python2

>>59468899
I tried to git clone the github repository and build directly from there, same error

cd ungoogled-chromium/
 ungoogled-chromium $ python3 build.py                                                                             
2017-03-18 23:00:21,633 - INFO: Initialized default console logging handler
2017-03-18 23:00:21,633 - INFO: Using builder LinuxStaticBuilder
2017-03-18 23:00:21,634 - INFO: Directory build does not exist. Creating...
2017-03-18 23:00:21,634 - INFO: Directory build/sandbox does not exist. Creating...
2017-03-18 23:00:21,634 - INFO: Directory build/downloads does not exist. Creating...
2017-03-18 23:00:21,634 - INFO: Directory build/path_overrides does not exist. Creating...
2017-03-18 23:00:21,635 - INFO: Setting up environment overrides...
2017-03-18 23:00:21,635 - INFO: Checking Python 2 command...
2017-03-18 23:00:21,635 - INFO: No Python 2 command specified; testing with 'python'
2017-03-18 23:00:21,668 - ERROR: Unsupported Python version '3.6.0'
 ungoogled-chromium $ python build.py
2017-03-18 23:00:27,389 - INFO: Initialized default console logging handler
2017-03-18 23:00:27,389 - INFO: Using builder LinuxStaticBuilder
2017-03-18 23:00:27,390 - INFO: Setting up environment overrides...
2017-03-18 23:00:27,390 - INFO: Checking Python 2 command...
2017-03-18 23:00:27,390 - INFO: No Python 2 command specified; testing with 'python'
2017-03-18 23:00:27,416 - ERROR: Unsupported Python version '3.6.0' 

What the actual fuck

>>59469030
do this >>59468961

>>59469030
Actually, python corresponds to the python3 cmd, which should not happen.

>>59469030
nvm, python3 = python in arch
I tried with python2

 ~ cd ungoogled-chromium/                                                       
 ungoogled-chromium $ python2 build.py                                          
  File "build.py", line 50
    print("ERROR: {!s}".format(exc), file=sys.stderr)
                                         ^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
 ungoogled-chromium $                                                        1 

I also did sudo ln -s /bin/python2.7 /usr/local/bin/python2 , it still doesn't work

File: fuck_google.png (405KB, 3564x906px) Image search: [Google]

405KB, 3564x906px

>>59468945
Wow look at the cherrypicking. How much is Google paying you to shill here?
This is from the first 3 pages of 100. There are over 3 thousand results. Plenty of it is connections to google.

Now Mordecai is going to not pay you extra sheckles today huh?

>>59465547
>Performance is subpar compared to Chromium and you know it.

Firefox runs better on my computer, takes up way less space and runs great addons without as much botnet shit as Chrome.

>>59469154
Try building with the PKGBUILD instead. Also build.py is meant for python3, but the internal building of chromium itself uses python2.
It should be seeing python2 in >>59469030
but it might not be looking at your PATH, or /usr/local/bin might not be in your PATH. You can try linking /bin/python2.7 to /bin/python2 even though its considered very bad practice to do so, and see if it works then.

>>59469187
>I have no fucking idea what I'm talking about: the post
None of those are connections to google.

One of them doesn't even have any urls in it.
One is checking that a url parsing method properly extracts sections of the url string using a google domain string as an example.
One is checking that a url formatter properly lowercases input.
One is only ever built at all when the compilation target is chrome, not chromium.
One is setting default domain access permissions for extensions.
Two of them are tests that aren't part of the browser at all and only run if you specifically build and run the test suite separately.

Learn what you're talking about before you go running your retarded mouth you tinfoiler.

File: 1480202081001.png (94KB, 248x258px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 248x258px

ungoogled-chromium or Chromium?

>>59465493
Can't even get sound out of firefox no more, even though I have pulseaudio installed.

>>59465486
Isn't that run by sjw 'coder' programmers?

>>59465486
Ungoogled chromium is less botnet than vanilla Firefox

>>59469421
>chromium is un-googled
epik

>>59468877
No one install addons?

>>59469373
Search these in the github:
GoogleURLTracker
kIPv6ProbeAddress
kUpdaterDefaultUrl
ShouldShowPromoAtStartup
kShowAppLauncherPromo
GoogleApiKeysInfoBarDelegate
Gaia
gcm_client
signin
translate

All of these connect to and use google services. They can all easily be used for tracking.

>>59469594
Basic ones :
HTTPS Everywhere + uBlock origin + uMatrix + NoScript

>>59469622
>all that fucking redundancy
please stop

>>59469030
>>59469154
>>59469352
You're using the static builder. It is meant to get a statically linked build that will run on every linux distro (like Google does with Chrome).

Check how to use the Arch builder instead. Though, I'm not sure if the code to build it on arch works 100% yet.

If you want an easier way, turn on a Ubuntu 14.04 VM and make a static build there, then transfer it to your host HDD.

>>59469670
I built it on Arch with no problems using AUR

>>59469609
>All of these connect to and use google services
No, they don't all do that. Many of them do not, and the ones that do are features that can be enabled or disabled by the user at any time.

For example, ShouldShowPromoAtStartup is a flag that determines whether the browser should display an internal page welcoming the user to the browser upon first launch. Firefox has the exact same thing.
GoogleURLTracker is used for instant results in the Omnibox, which is an optional feature that the user may turn off.
Gaia is a fucking authentication service.

Again, take your conspiracy bullshit somewhere else. You don't have any idea what you're talking about, and you're just coming up with bullshit and hoping that nobody knows enough about the browser to actually refute you.

If you can point out in the Chromium source code something that actually makes it into a Chromium target (and not just a Chrome target) that tracks the user without any option available to disable it, then post that. Until then, fuck off.

>>59469551
No

>>59469557
Haha, lol, no

>>59465486
>>59469797
Yet again this namefag jumps into a thread to be retarded for attention

here is better version of the userscript to downoad extensions without freaking jquery

// ==UserScript==
// @name         Get DRX
// @namespace    cf.admicos.stuff.chromium-crx
// @version      1.0.2
// @description  Get crx of extension for Chrome
// @author       Admicos
// @match        https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/*
// @grant        none
// @require      http://code.jquery.com/jquery-3.1.1.slim.min.js
// @downloadURL  http://chromium-crx.stuff.admicos.cf/get.user.js
// ==/UserScript==

/*
 * Changelog:
 *  - 1.0.2
 *    Removed a leftover debug alert.
 *
 *  - 1.0.1
 *    Made fully clientside
 *
 *  - 1.0.0
 *    Initial release
 */

 var url = window.location.href;
 var main = "https://clients2.google.com/service/update2/crx?response=redirect&prodversion=48.0&x=id%3D[EXTENSION_ID]%26installsource%3Dondemand%26uc";

 url = url.replace("https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/", "");
 url = url.split("/")[1];
 url = url.split("?")[0];
 url = main.replace("[EXTENSION_ID]", url);

setTimeout(function() {
    var element = document.querySelectorAll('div.h-e-f-Ra-c.e-f-oh-Md-zb-k');
    element = element[0];

    var a = document.createElement('a');
    var linkText = document.createTextNode("Download");
    a.appendChild(linkText);
    a.title = "my title text";
    a.href = url;
    element.appendChild(a);
}, 2000)

>>59470302
>without freaking jquery

// @require      http://code.jquery.com/jquery-3.1.1.slim.min.js

hwat

How do you guys deal with bookmarks?

Only real reason I stick with Chrome is due to synced bookmarks.

>>59470912
I currently have over 800 open tabs

>>59470912
Firefox syncs bookmarks as well.

>>59465558
On what basis is any of this true? No performance, compatiblity, or and evidence comparison. I used to think 4chan was smart, but since everyone's anonymous it's hard to tell.

>>59471021
Why would you even ask? It's some weird kid's MSPaint meme.

File: ComodoBrowserLogo.jpg (10KB, 300x163px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 300x163px

>Chromium is a botnet
>Firefox and other flavors are laggy as fuck for some god damned reason

Guess i'll just stick with Comodo. Has the speed of chrome but without the botnet, it just werks.

File: 1473734511313.png (1MB, 1833x1920px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1833x1920px

>>59471021
>I used to think 4chan was smart
You've been memed friendo

>>59465486
>>59469824
>only namefig on whole /g/
>female
I still cant believe what a cliche this is. Why do girls literally ALWAYS want attention? Even for fucking autist tech conversations dayum

>>59471799
Its biological.

>>59466736
>holy fuck you are retarded. why do you need to constantly update something that isnt broken?
Found the LYNX user.

File: selection.png (904KB, 3724x3468px) Image search: [Google]

904KB, 3724x3468px

Safari is better.
>resolutionlets can't see this image on their entire screen

>>59465470
If your browser connects to the internet at all, it's a botnet.

>>59472216
>you will never have an offline copy of the entire internet to browse without the constant paranoia of every action being monitored logged