Arch Anywhere is just so comfy. Why don't you use it, anon?

File: 1489784781829.jpg (20KB, 400x300px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 400x300px

>>59455033

>>59455033
I don't go anywhere.

File: 1481305087478.jpg (22KB, 486x558px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 486x558px

>>59455033
>installing arch

>>59455071
this

>>59455033
>that Pink Floyd logo
Hipster as fuck...

>>59455033
If you cant install arch the normal way, then you haven't earned the right to use it.

>>59455033
I don't get what you are asking: the description reads like this is basically just an install script for Arch, what benefits would it have over a regular installation? If this was some kind of portable configuration that would be neat, but the name seems badly chosen overall.

>>59455033
Feliz is better

>>59455190
Arch Anywhere is easy and comfy

>>59455033
>arch
Arch is for children.
Use a mans distribution.
Use Debian.

Can I do a persistent USB installation?

>>59455033
b-but anon, i do

the arch iso is solid what is this nonsense.

I use Lubuntu.

Because it doesn't work. It can't even boot up properly

>>59455551
I've used it in VM and worked perfectly fine and I'm just a windowsfag who never used linux

>>59455588
Good for you, it didn't work on MY machine whenever I have normal hardware. I used Rufus to make the bootable flash drive.

>>59455510
>"stuck in 2012" distro
Debian belongs to servers, not Desktop.

Manjaro is more comfy

>>59455033
Antergos is much better

>>59455181
>muh snowflake distro
couldn't care less, don't use arch, but love to see retards get cucked