Highest performing amd processor

wait for X399. 16 cores / 23 threads. Coming H2.

>>59453482
Retard thats X299

Right now Ryzen 1800x.
Use this site: http://cpu.userbenchmark.com/

>>59453482
>wait for....

Ever notice how that's always an AMD fags answer to everything?

File: 1418837727563.jpg (30KB, 203x345px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 203x345px

Well that's just because intel hasn't released a relevant desktop cpu since Sandy Bridge and 5 generations later the only gain they mustered up is some 10% of this and that. That figure also includes the pricetag, jewtel cuck.
>muh 1000+$ workstation cpu

File: 1484111197324.jpg (263KB, 800x601px) Image search: [Google]

263KB, 800x601px

>>59453482
>Wait to upgrade to our new Coffeelake and Skylake-X motherboards!
>Just wait!!! Our X99 and Z270 motherboards will be worthless, and we'll pay twice as much for 5% more performance, but it'll be worth it just wait!!!
>Oh no.. Snowy Owl is here with 16 cores, 32 threads, and Skylake-X only actually has 12 threads. B-but I still feel good waiting for Intel to feed me more overpriced disappointing shit.

>>59452767
If price doesn't matter, then obviously the 1800X. That's the best one.

If you want better, Snowy Owl may be coming to a HEDT platform like X299 with with 16core/32thread/32mb L3, and quad channel memory support for up to 1TB of RAM.
And even if they don't make a HEDT platform for it, you could just use them like how people use Xeons for desktop with minor issues here and there.