https://youtu.be/17ZyeHmJADc
How much has technology damaged you /g/?
How the FUCK does non-ionizing radiation emitted in the milliwatt range cause DNA damage?
Nothing of value was lost
is sleeping next to my phone killing me slowly?
>>59441688
by the year 2100 humanity will be gone anyway
who cares
>>59441772
Having a lame trip like yours should be grounds for death by radiation.
>>59441688
>radio waves
>killing anything
>>59441823
But mih bees
>>59441834
It's actually herbicides and fungicides that have been killing the bees. Things that kill things don't just kill one thing.
>>59441688
Shit, if I knew this I would but a router below my balls and save up on condoms/
>>59441688
So are you telling me I can just overpower a router and keep it next to my balls while I sleep and Ill never need a condom?
Why haven't we made this a product yet?
Even better we could setup massive transmission towers to give "Free wifi" to black neighborhoods and cause them to not reproduce
>>59441688
You would literally get more damage from taking a plane flight from LA to NY than 100 years of your modem duct taped to your fucking balls OP.
Kill yourself.
>dead sperm
NO CONDOM
>>59441798
no
only ionising radiation is harmful, phones use far from enough power to ionise, there are international standards in place that products must follow that keeps them from emitting harmful rays
your body gives off more powerful radiation than your phone
>>59442614
Only women see this as a bad thing because they don't like the idea of men being in control of their ability to reproduce in some way they aren't aware of.
They should have done another test which covered the sperm with a layer of skin and a layer of clothes, that would have been more realistic.
>>59441688
so far only good news
>>59441688
>worrying about low-power non-ionizing radiation
>going outside is a-okay though
People are dumb fucks when it comes to things they only know through vague association (like "nuclear bomb = radiation = bad", therefore "radiation = bad"). That's why opponents of any kind of wireless technology always demand impossible proof since their reasoning is solely driven by ideology and emotions as opposed to logic and evidence.
>>59443839
I'm pretty sure that at this point it's fairly well known that radio waves easily penetrate skin and fabric.
>>59442853
you're one of those nihilistic retards that thinks it's a good idea to get a vasectomy aren't you?
>>59442567
>You would literally get more damage from taking a plane flight from LA to NY
Why would you take a flight from one shit hole to another?
>>59444003
If I decide to get a vasectomy it is certainly within my rights.
It certainly wouldn't make sense to not mention it to someone I decided to form a starting-a-family level relationship with, but if my goal was just condomless sexytimes then I wouldn't have to just rely on the woman to be on the pill, or take a morning after pill or any of the other contraceptive they can chose to take around sex without you knowing.
And I believe that vasectomys are reversible, which is an added benefit.
>>59441688
>use wifi since 2007
>made kids in 2010 and 2014
stop this memeing.
>>59444149
Yeah but with less sperm count the threshold of the standards fell, they could have had superior genes.
>>59444003
How did his ability to get a vasectomy cause such anal pain in you?
Are you in some sort of pro-seminal-vesicle movement?
Sperm lives matter?
>had wifi for like 15 years
>had trouble conceiving
>now have cancer
>Donald trump elected POTUS
wifi malice confirmed. Shut it down.
Can someone explain what ionizing radiation is ? I don't understand
>>59444195
Have you tried looking it up on the internet?
>>59444195
It produces toxins in your body by interrupting your quantum field.
It can be healed with holistic therapy, but it is better to just avoid all radiation and electronics you suspect are powered with nuclear power.
>>59444179
Now will you admit that WiFi was invented by Australians?
>>59444165
>one of them outgrows every kid within her age group and started writing and typing at the age of 5
>the other one shows early signs of high intelligence
>both blonde and blue eyed
can't top this.
>>59444775
that's not a good sign. They probably have autism...
>>59441772
TINFOIL HATS ARE COOL, THAT'S ALL