Have you bought WinRAR ?

7z

File: 7z.png (8KB, 241x288px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 241x288px

>>59438203
What's the point

No, I don't even use winrar because I'm not mentally retarded.

>>59438203
u can just download licence key from internet... u have a key like 5 years old still working on latest version on winRAR, good guy winrar again :D

Lol nonfree trash

File: 1463352376555.jpg (32KB, 604x604px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 604x604px

>win-rar

>>59438218
this x100

delete this thread

>>59438203
why the everlasting fuck would u use winrar in 2017

>>59438218
>kgb botnet

no, but I still use it over 7z

>>59438203
16th of April 2004.

>>59438218
>>59438223
>>59438268
>>59438276
>>59438287
>>59438293
why all the hate for winrar?
>eternal 40 day trial of memes
>packages shit
>unpackages shit

what more could you want?

>>59438435
Botnet

>>59438435
no shitty trial popups every time i want to do 1 of those things

>>59438435
Are you mentally retarded or just a fucking idiot?

>>59438307
Alright, here you go
http://www.7-zip.org/a/7z1604-src.7z
Point out where Boris placed the backdoor, anon.

>>59438435
>eternal 40 day trial of memes
My file manager shouldn't be a "meem". I also don't want a popup begging me to buy some outdated trash every time I want to unzip a compressed folder. RARLabs is also slow as shit at patching vulnerabilities in their code.

I used registered winrar and 7zip side by side for a bit recently after using 7zip exclusvely for many years, and decompression time seems to be of little difference and lzma2 from 7zip seems to compress slightly better than rar5.
The only acutal difference I noticed was that with winrar some archives would show me readme nfo files when I opened them and winrar extracts the tar's when decompressing them. Where as 7zip doesn't display nfo files for reading, and extracts the .tar file which you have to extract again if desired.

File: [gg]_Zan_Sayonara_Zetsubou_sensei_-_10_[16A00748].mkv_snapshot_00.07_[2014.09.12_21.04.17].jpg (51KB, 848x480px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 848x480px

>>59438203

I did in 2004. I didn't know 7zip was even a thing for 4 years.

>>59438203
I still use the evaluation version of WinRAR. I tried 7zip for a while but it doesn't have an option to automatically remove redundant folders so I switched back.

winrar's icon > 7z icon

>there are people here who haven't edited their registry to make winzip think you've paid for it

>>59438203
No, I'm not some richfag that throws money at every beggar.

I use 7zip, but on an older machine it takes forever to encode. This is one area where I think WinRAR got it right. Apple did some experimenting with Lempel Ziv algorithms in an attempt to make it less processor intensive, but the results weren't any better than GZip.

>>59438307
WinRAR developers are Russian too. I guess you're fucked.

>>59438203
Worse compression, slower decompression, and proprietary.
Why would I use it, let alone pay for it?

Winrar basically wants you to use it for free. Regular consumers using it for free making it a more widespread standard. That means more corporations will use winrar to distribute files, and corporations do care about the law, and will buy winrar.

File: 1462584337108.png (25KB, 964x800px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 964x800px

>>59438203
>Have you bought WinRAR
What for? I'm not a retard or a toddler so I don't use Winshit.

Stay retarded, kid.

>>59438203
>using shitty windows software
>>>/v/

>>59438435
say the line winrar!

File: winrar.png (351KB, 560x765px) Image search: [Google]

351KB, 560x765px

>>59440444
winrar.

people should start using bandizip

it's far better than 7z

>>59441102
How so?

>>59438307
https://wikileaks.org/ciav7p1/cms/page_16385046.html
enjoy your cia trojan