anyone else hyped for coffee?

>>59430076

AMD IS FINISHED

>15% improvement from Skylake to Kabylake
We all know this didn't happen.

>>59430076
>15%
So 1,5% improvement just like Kaby Lake, nice.

>>59430138
>,
this is not a european board

>>59430138
lmao this

this graphic is about mobile chips

>>59430183
but in the small writing at the bottom it says based on windows desktop

>still on 14nm
Just fuck my yields up senpai

>announced Process-Architecture-Optimization release schdule
>throw it out the window less than a year later

What did Intel mean by this?

>>59430298
anything below 14nm is a meme on silicone.

>>59430535
meme is a funny way to say 'causes quantum tunelling'

>>59430092
Kek

>>59430076
>AMD threads nothing but shills and trolls shitting everywhere
>Intel thread .. crickets

Yup. Intel has this in the bag. Can't wait for another pointless rehash, megahurtz bump with shitty TIM keeping thermals in the 80+ range while they're staring down at Zen+ improving on all the issues Zen had.

>>59430203
It's desktop as in Window's benchmarks that aren't UWP or RT
And desktop as in AIO built with laptop parts
>>59431933
Zen+/zenver2 promises up to a 15% IPC increase, and the project lead said that things that didn't made it into Zen like 256 bit FPU and even AVX512 support would be present

>>59430138
This

>>59430076
Waiting for new ayymd APU, so i don't care.

>>59432017
Will the fix the desktop chipset having zero fucking pcie lanes and dual channel memory?

is moores law finally kill?

>>59435036
The International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors says that the end is in 2020, at 5 nm. I think it'll take longer than 2020 to get there though, and there'd barely be any performance improvements.

>>59432017
pinnacle ridge when?
i'll let all you cucks be the beta testers for this new arch and catch it once hbm and pcie4 are out

>>59435241
I'm with you on this, it's going to be in double digits until 2020+ for desktops at least.

File: 1486502721346.jpg (19KB, 248x255px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 248x255px

>>59430138

>>59430076
Have u ever been so shrunk that you shrunk your shrunk and then took that tiny shrink and shrank it some more

>>59430138
It says "better performance"

so it's just clocked higher again

>>59430076
when will we reach the post silicon era?

"Advancing Moore's law on 14nm"

I thought Moore's law was the transitor count doubling every so years. So how can it be advanced on the same process?

>>59430076
>hyped for burning money
Yeah totally ...

>>59430652
I guess if you oc to 10ghz on 5v, the effects of quantum tunnelling wont be that noticeable. Its the future. The electrons will appear elsewhere in your room.

>>59430076
>15%

>>59436124
I think it's just using it as a buzzword and meaning performance

>>59430076
>on SysMark
lmao

>>59438232
so intel thinks overclocking a cpu from the factory counts as a "15%" increase?