>Intel hyberbreading >working properly

Shut this down please sir.

15 years.

FIFTEEN FUCKING YEARS TO GET HT WORKING.

>>59427941
what kind of game is that?

Hi there, my name is Eshkol Chipstein from Intel Corporation®.

Please cease and desist posting this image immediately.

I have a 3570k ita 4 cores no HT bc its an i5. Very good processor, but i wish 8 core 16t ryzen was optimized. Perhaps more cores will never be better than the optimum 4- 6

>>59427941
>largest http webserver on the planet
>Intel still hasn't fixed HT for this application

The problem with that is Apache is pretty shitty code and can't multitask very well past a certain point - it has the same issues on any modern CPU hardware or OSes.

>want to prove something
>posts some webshit test
pick one

>>59428357
wow, sorry they used an actually important metric instead of manchild game shit.

>>59428309
There's plenty of other stuff that doesn't use a lot of cores but that doesn't lose 40% performance with SMT enabled.

>>59427941
>it's the processor's fault that your shitty benchmark has negative scaling with more threads

are there any use cases where hyperthreading is actually beneficial?

>>59428652
No, of course not.
It's merely a joke and Intel and AMD waste precious silicon to have it there.

>>59427941
>using apache
>ever
>even for benchmark

pls kys, shit company, shit software, shit webserver

>>59428733
>30%+ of the worldwide webserver market dun matter!

>>59428741
99% of people don't matter

what's your point?

apache used to be great, now it's garbage

use something that isn't disgraceful to /g/, like nginx
otherwise you might as well go to fucking /b/

>>59427941
>drops in performance on 6 cores
>LET'S TRY 12 THREADS!

>>59427991
HT works just fine. My i7 3770 at 3.3GHz runs right with my i5 4670k at 3.9.

>>59428399
>web dev
>important
performance was never important in that world because of network bottlenecks and huge latencies, so the software sucks

just look at their languages and how awful slow those are
>php
>python
>ruby

>>59428768
tfw they still probably can't comprehend it and want to benchmark a 6950

>>59428750
But it matters when RYZEN sucks with it?

>>59428842
no, apache is garbage. idc what you think is good or bad with it. apache is garbage.

>>59428853
It's still top dog, go eat shit with your buggy newfangled webservers written in the latest hip nodejs library

File: Screenshot from 16-03-2017 13:14:41.png (39KB, 862x369px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 862x369px

>>59428885
>>59428853

>>59428885
no it isn't, it's garbage and it's one of the slowest web servers out.
nodejs is also shit, stop crying kiddo

>>59428896
kek @ that drop. Looks like people are quickly realizing how bad it is

>>59428911
>15% drop in 3 years

Oh yeah I'm sure ngnix will take over in another 10 years.

>>59428934
It's already taken over every big and medium site

pretty much garbage that doesn't matter, runs the garbage web server

all garbage hosts that charge nothing-15/month for shitty stupid sites all use the most basic of basic LAMP setup.. mysql is also fucking shit

get rekt kid 2-3 people are against your autist past living ass here

File: 59428811.png (32KB, 730x363px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 730x363px

>>59428934
It'll happen soon

>>59427941
>performance is the same with 5 and 6 cores
>enabling HT fucks up performance
>HT at fault

are you retarded or something? If performance is the same with 5 and 6 cores it means this piece of crap software doesn't scale beyond 5 threads so enabling HT will by default fuck up the performance. Compare performance with 1 and 2 cores with HT enabled and disabled and see what you get then.

>>59428960
>soon
>apache at 41%
>ngnix at 28% or 29%
>it took ngnix from Sep 2004 to Sep 2006 to gain 8-9% marketshare


Soon is pushing it, 3 years being optimistic.

>>59428965
>HT enabled and disabled and see what you get then.
I get 2% less performance, not 40% less.

>>59427941
Stretching the load on all threads lowers performance, but how much power less does it use? This is kinda important.
If the power gain is big, and you already have adequate performance to serve HTTP to some dozen or hundred people, then it's a no brainer to scale the load on more cores.

>2017
Still waiting for hyperthreading to work

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rW6M8D41ZWU

Brings back memories.

>>59429030
>Uploaded on Nov 6, 2005
Nice.

>>59428975
https://news.netcraft.com/archives/2017/01/12/january-2017-web-server-survey.html

rofl it's true

rip apache

even microsoft >

>>59429314
by next year top 1 million sites nginx will be leading

in 5 years nginx will lead overall active sites

in 10 years it'll lead overall dead & alive

>>59429314
Pretty huge difference between "all sites" and "active sites"

>>59428001
Terraria

>>59428750
>>59428948
>>59429314
>>59429345
Looks like grandpa is quite triggered. Stick your reddit spacing up your ass and go back to your safe space >>>/reddit/