AI Redpill

>>59422944
>Any promissing Turing results

Ignorant noob detected.

>>59422944

we can only hope that theres some autistic crazy anon out there who is currently coding the human brain every synapse one by one like an absolut maniac

>>59422944

True AI? My guess is 60-100 years. People are trying to model it after the human brain/conscious, because its the only thing we know that has produced intelligence.
Lots of progress has been made on trying to understand the pure physical side of the brain, but there is still a lot we don't know. How the brain is organized and works on a "software" level? Everyone is all over the place with that and can't agree on much.
In all honestly, I think someone will create a true AI and not know how it works/how they exactly did it.

>wanting true AI EVER
Why would anyone want this. The only reason nothing is currently wiping us out is because we're the smartest sentient beings walking around.

>>59425116
https://helios.ai

File: 652.jpg (13KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 250x250px

>>59425256

>>59422944
The latest research seems to indicate quantum effects in the brain, so AI is on hold until we get quantum computers working well. Plus all those floating points.

>>59422944

No one here can give you a definitive answer. Breakthroughs in AI tech could happen at any time. There have been some solid leaps in AI regarding DeepMind and similar projects recently which looks promising. Optimistically I'd like to think within 30 years but realistically it could take us anywhere from 5 years to a 100 no one really knows

>>59422944
Define I

>AI

kek

>>59425116

>muh supremacy

luddite plz go and stay go

File: 1466749241.jpg (247KB, 768x1024px) Image search: [Google]

247KB, 768x1024px

Specialized AI is pretty good already. Lots of industries are successfully using genetic algorithms, expert systems, neural networks since the 80s.