Daily reminder to use FreeBSD.
Which BSD is the best BSD? And why?
>>59408079
Nah, I like when my software and hardware actually works
>>59408440
FreeBSD. But to start off with any BSD is better than nothing.
>>59408457
who are you quoting?
>>59408079
>not netbsd
fuck off
But I use OpenBSD.
GUYS WHICH BSD?
>>59408519
>openbsd
>not backdoored
>netbsd
>not absolutely useless
>freebsd
>not satanic
install hardened gentoo
>>59408519
BEE
ESS
DEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>59408440
I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you’re referring to as BSD, is in fact, BSD/kqueue, or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, BSD plus kqueue. kqueue is not an operating system unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning BSD system made useful by the BSD corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full OS as defined by POSIX.
Many computer users run a modified version of the BSD system every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of BSD which is widely used today is often called “kqueue”, and many of its users are not aware that it is basically the BSD system, developed by the BSD Project. There really is a kqueue, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the system they use.
kqueue is the kernel: the program in the system that allocates the machine’s resources to the other programs that you run. The kernel is an essential part of an operating system, but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of a complete operating system. kqueue is normally used in combination with the BSD operating system: the whole system is basically BSD with kqueue added, or BSD/kqueue. All the so-called “kqueue” distributions are really distributions of BSD/kqueue.
Daily reminder FreeBSD is bad and insecure.
https://vez.mrsk.me/freebsd-defaults.txt
>>59408566
>>59408519
FreeBSD.
GhostBSD if you want a start