Antergos or Manjaro

>>59405593

i use manjaro but i prefer Antergos

does this make you think? Yes me too ...

Antergos

File: 13178642_10209483657667368_4864046687941115634_n.jpg (29KB, 500x416px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 500x416px

>>59405593
I have a huge hardon for mhwd. so Manjaro.

>>59405593
Antergos or Arch Anywhere. Manjaro is bloat to say the least. Specific repos that introduce new bugs it's just stupid.

>>59405593
Manjaro. It saves you time and is very good by default.

Manjaro if youre not an autist whose favorite pastime is pointlessly fiddling with linux

Angergos uses GNOME by default, Manjaro uses XFCE. There's also Chakra, which uses KDE by default.

They both suck. Install Fedora and be an adult.

>>59405593
If you come from Arch, I think Antergos would be the best choice since it uses the same repos.

File: neofetch-2017-03-13-04-30-44-8329.png (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1080px

>>59405593
TFW fully configuring arch doesn't take more than 45 minutes

File: 2017-03-13-195259_1920x1080_scrot.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

>>59407271
TFW fully configuring arch doesn't take more than 12 minutes

>>59405593
But you could use architect or arch anywhere and install vanilla arch in the same time either of those would take

>>59407346
What theme is it?

>>59407451
no theme

I'd say Antergos. It' *almost* like Arch with an installer. But I just don't "get" Manjaro.

>>59405593
manjaro is an ugly mess.

Antergos is much better, and less crash prone.

>>59407680
Arch has an installer.

>>59406750
Antergos now lets you choose at install.
I chose KDE.

>>59407773
Or you can use architect which has an option for all of them, even fringe stuff like deepin