>Mozilladrones will try to defend this
>>59399733
No, we don't give a shit. Please don't bump when reaching the last page.
>b-b-b-but muh Google botnet!!!!
>>59399733
plz donate. we need more diversity departments
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Diversity_and_Inclusion_Strategy
>People who buy 16 GB of RAM and then complain when a program uses RAM
>>59399855
>diversity
And by that they mean Indians and Asians. I can't imagine they'd hire Africans for anything worthwhile in the development sector. You can't code with chisels on rocks.
>>59399733
>How dares it use my RAM!
>>59399733
>quark hammer
Idk, it works fine for me. Also I use the x64 version.
>>59400064
His image name Anon. Always read the fucking image name.
Woman, I swear to god.
>>59399733
Chromium based browser have the same problem, they just spread RAM usage over several processes.
>>59399804
>>59399825
>>59399855
>>59399856
>>59399891
>>59399923
>>59400064
>>59400133
>>59400237
>nobody noticed the CPU spikes
/g/ - "Technology"
>>59400258
Congrats, you can read a graph!
>>59400258
>no info on what CPU it's running on, what tabs are open and how many, what extensions are installed, what addons are running, how long the browser has been open, etc.
This was never worth defending because there's no information to even defend.
wtf I hate mozilla nao!!!!11
>>59400258
I >>59400133 noticed it. But didn't care to question OP about it, because it's obviously not his image.
How retarded are you?
chromium's using ~6.8GiB ram atm here
>>59400348
Why should I trust what a big baka has to say about anything?
>>59400348
>5 firefox processes
Wow, it's like you don't know how to use a computer.
>>59399733
Don't you have enough ram?
>>59401407
More like I know how to enable multiprocessing