Fuck me in the ass. Github allows repo owners to correct wrongthink

>>59399354
The Stack sites have the same capabilities. e.g. Stack Overflow, etc

To be fair removing the credentials of people to prevent personal attacks and shit like that isn't a bad use for that. It's also clearly marked as edited.

>>59399448
Stackexchange is basically a technical questions and answers wiki. It's different from editing Github issues because people are often invited to post their complaints, opinions, suggestions and other subjective things there.

>>59399496
It's clearly marked as edited the same way as when you edit the post yourself. How often have hovered that word to see who edited it?

>>59399514
The guy who edited the post specifically mentioned the reasoning behind it in the next post.

If someone edited one of your posts all you'd have to do is posted a follow up comment about it and everyone would know.

>>59399354
>Using github in the year of the god emperor
Your fault bro.

>>59399542
>If someone edited one of your posts all you'd have to do is posted a follow up comment about it and everyone would know.


Are you full autistic? "They can edit your posts, so if you realize they did it, you can just make a new post about it, so they can edit it too".

>>59399786
If they keep editing your posts it just becomes more obvious. You could also file a bug report asking for the person to be removed to make it really visible. You could also post on other sites where they can't edit. The owner of the repo likely wouldn't just edit your posts for no reason though,

File: 1488928679085.jpg (270KB, 750x728px) Image search: [Google]

270KB, 750x728px

>>59399859
>The owner of the repo likely wouldn't just edit your posts for no reason though
>"this is problematic"