What browser will you use come this November?

In a sense we should be thankful that Mozilla has decided to euthanise themselves by removing the only reason anyone still uses their browser over chrome.

But it's still sad seeing an old friend get a terrible illness and have no choice but to kill themselves.

>>59396632
Vivaldi

>>59396632
Firefox

>>59396632
Ublock origin is moving to Web extension, so I'm happy.

>>59396632
Mozilla baffles me.
>Have great browser (Mozilla)
>Put more and more shit into it
>our browser is too slow because we put too much shit into it, we need to start fresh
>Have great browser (Firefox)
>repeat

Is webextensions bad? Why should I not use addons made with it?

>>59396632
I will use whatever fork TST dev will use. Or I will make my own. With TST at its core.

Lynx

>>59397300
The problem is that they're dropping support for XUL extensions (literally most extensions).

Some of them will maybe be ported over, but many, many will not. Classic theme restorer is dead and gone come November for example.

I can only hope they give better UI customization options when this happens or I will be looking elsewhere. Knowing Mozilla they won't do this though, so I'm already looking now.

>>59397349
Fuck, CTR is a must have with how hopelessly ugly and unfunctional default ff theme is

>>59396676
sad
fpbp

>>59397349
it's as if their devs are paid to sabotage their shit in favor of other browsers

>>59396632

Exclusively Chrome and I'll use a download manager instead of DownThemAll

Vivaldi my melanin-gifted friends

>>59396632
I have been using firefox for i dont remember how long but after last update i think im finished with it.
Fucking trash cant handle site like facebook or youtube and freezes all the time.
Right now i on chromium botnet, fuck it.
I was never exploring other options, is there any good browser for linux?

>>59397498
shit went downhill since they introduced rounded corners, like in chrome

i thought chromium is opensource - why botnet?

>>59397497
fuck your vivaldi piece of shit, but your comment made me kek

>>59397497
i like 4 seasons but is browser good?
I never tried it
tell me 4 real nigga

File: Избор_089.png (18KB, 738x271px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 738x271px

Nice website vivaldi, nice download speed you fucking poor retards

>>59397564
Shit is dank yo. It's Chromium but with some extra bells and whistles. Slam that muthafuckin' download button foo'

File: Избор_090.png (184KB, 682x272px) Image search: [Google]

184KB, 682x272px

>>59397607
Doing it

Probably Iridium.

Will hold on with 52 esr for long time being, after it being EOS will jump to palemoon probably, or finally accepting no vertical tabs on chromium.

>>59397607
as if chrome is not bloated enough

File: soon.png (29KB, 933x690px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 933x690px

I'm starting to work on my webkit-based linux-only web browser. There will be no javascript, because it become cancer today and sites which don't work without js should kys. Interface could be similar to pic related and dns query ad/tracking filter will be inbuilt.

It can't be popular, but if you guys can make nice logo and name, I will be pleased.

>>59397534
Even opensource Chromium have proprietary binary blobs that calls home, so there is not much difference between Chrome and Chromium.

>>59397498
Have you tried all the usual troubleshooting methods?
Remove unnecessary add-ons. Start in safe-mode (with add-ons disabled) and see if the problem persists. (Just hold down your shift key while starting Firefox.)
Resetting your user profile (can be done through "Troubleshooting Information" in the "Help" menu of the main menu.)

Probably jump to waterfox or another forks.

>>59396632
Firefox.

I expect that all add-ons I use will be ported.

>>59397758
>webkit based
so just another chrome reskin

>>59397809
well shit...

I was using nochromox64 for my android thinking to myself i'm ninja senpai

It seems a bit silly to leave Firefox for a different browser because of this change, since you'd just be moving to another browser which has exactly the same problem you're leaving Firefox for.

I don't use too many extensions anyway. Of the few I do use, most of them are likely to be fairly straightforward to port to WebExtensions. My main concern is Greasemonkey, as it seems like it's pretty much destined to just be Tampermonkey now, and Tampermonkey is garbage.

File: b62.gif (407KB, 359x371px) Image search: [Google]

407KB, 359x371px

>firefags is ded because i cant customize it anymore and some addons maybe won't get ported over

>>59396632
Vivaldi, it's the one i've been using since release desu

Looks like I'm staying with ESR forever...

File: firefucks btfo.jpg (222KB, 958x766px) Image search: [Google]

222KB, 958x766px

chrome and safari
oh wait...

>>59398524
correct.

>>59397758
What you're making has already been made and is called Dillo or Netsurf.

Safari on my Mac and Chrome on my Windows.

i'm going to stick with firefox, why would i want to switch? only using a handfull of (popular) extentions that will most likely migrate.

>>59397300

Do you use Self-destructing cookies on firefox?

That addon will not work on WebExtensions

>>59398513
>Tampermonkey is garbage
Why?

>>59398972
Thanks, NetSurf was what I wanted. Quick and easy like my sexual performance.

I'm going to actually start working on my own browser based on Servo. Firefox is dead to me.

>>59398972
>>59399604
NetSurf javascript is shit, can't even post here with it.

>>59396676
>thankful

No. But if there's hardly a reason to use Firefox over anything else, I'll use anything else.

>>59397599
cao burazeru. korisni yandex brovzer.

>>59398524
It's important when the only reason you use Firefox is for a bunch of addons that radically change the browser.

The sad part is there's no replacement for it either.

I'm thinking about giving ChrOpera another go. Maybe it's decent now.

>>59396632
I'll keep using the same one I've always been using: SeaMonkey.

>>59397314
>TST dev
the what dev?

>>59396632
Firefox. I hope they'll start integrating Servo by then.

>>59399631
I think I can go with non-js DuckDuckGo and Wikipedia. All I need. Then abandon 4chan.

I don't really care that these extensions are losing support.
There's no browser with better extension support anyway, and if you use Firefox nightly it's just as fast as ungoogled chromium.

>>59399868
>Then abandon 4chan.

Are you implying you can ever leave?

>>59396713
This -- ublock origin is the only extension that matters.

>>59396632
Will HTTPS Everywhere and uBlock origin work? If so Firefox, if not Chrome/Chromium or Vivaldi.

Unless they make an alternative to classic theme restorer I don't know what I'll do.

File: 1488670449931.jpg (46KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 500x500px

Jokes on you, I'll be dead before November.

File: 1416305811213.jpg (160KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

160KB, 1600x1200px

>>59399868
>Then abandon 4chan
That's cute.

>>59398305
chrome and chromium based on webkit fork called blink, so no, it is rather 'safari' reskin.

>>59400689
Make a Youtube live stream, so we can laugh at your misery.

>>59396632
Palemoon

>>59397349
xul is insecure shit anyway

>>59400715
>>59398305
webkit/blink

well but is a fork of either engine free of binary blobs from aplel/gugol?
or even the engine themselves arent really 100% open?

thats a huge difference, on the free side at least, on functionality its another matter entirely, and wouldn't really superseed all uses of firefox

>>59397758
why not do one based on gecko?
assuming you could have it future compatible with the current firefox extensions, while still taking advantage of mozilla security updates for the engine, i dont know if mi maknig any sense actuayl

File: 1488670466414.jpg (164KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

164KB, 500x500px

>>59400722
I won't give the botnet my suicide.
You guys can come to the place I'll tell you when the day comes if you want.

File: landscape-1433530746-esq-bothy.jpg (153KB, 980x490px) Image search: [Google]

153KB, 980x490px

>still caring about the web

Take the Cabin Pill.

>>59396632
Firefox fork

>>59396632
Probably Edge. At least using it gets me those sweet Bing points.

If someone is going to fuck me against my will I might as well get paid for it.

>>59399006
Seconded.
also, performance is still good when you block 90+% of all non-essential scripts.

I just won't update for now. If, however, something happens and I have to migrate to a different browser down the road, I guess I'll use Chromium. At least it's open source, unlike Chrome.

>>59400908
give it a couple years, and you will get tired of your porn collection and you will want broadband and a browser again

>>59397497
Such a garbage browser, almost as bad as Firefox or Edge

>>59401023
>I just won't update for now
you do know that every now and then any blink/webkit/gecko browser falls prey to a drive-by-infection dont you? and not all of them depended on javascript or media or some other plugin

do you like catching malware?

even if you only visit facebook and redit and gaysex.com, eventually the site falls to filter user submitted content and the malware catches you, i hope you have a backup scheme that can resist crypto malwares, and that you have a separate netbook or android device for internet banking and stuff

>>59400977
Edge is literally not even a bad browser, it's minimal and decently fast, smooth scrolling, touch friendly, still has shit Webm support though

>>59396676
FireFox.
Might try Vivaldi

>>59401105
>Edge
you forgot about closed source, how is it even an option? haha (not to mention youre likely using winfows 8/10 to run it)

>>59401127
>Most likely

No i'm going to run IE6 through WINE

>>59397498
Uzbl-tabbed

>>59400819
> why not do one based on gecko?
Assuming gecko will be abandoned by mozilla in early 2018 in favor of quantum and will reach end-of-life by then and it won't receive any security or otherwise updates, he made right choice.

> or even the engine themselves arent really 100% open?
Assuming there are public audits of both engines somewhere - they can answer this question.

>>59396632
firefox esr, palemoon, or seamonkey.

>>59396716
This.

>>59396632
Ive been using Waterfox and Cyberfox the past few months, still get these random lockups occasionally. I don't know if that's because webpages load 1000 js for no reason or because my pc is a bit dated (x4 640, 16gb meme ram) but its frustrating browsing the web nowadays.

>>59396632
firefox is dead anyways chrome all the way

>>59396716
Why does this keep happening

>>59396632
I have ublock and, new tab override and arc dark theme

If they stop working theres no point for me to use firefox, i will just migrate my bookmarks and say babay to firefoz and the SJW

>>59401584
>I told you about bloat bro!!!!
>I told you dog!

>>59401924
The bloat is never ending.

>300mb just for something putting words and pictures on the screen.

>>59396632
whichever firefox fork seems most promising at the time.

Is pentadactyl gonna work?
If not, what other browsers support it?
I wish it worked on seamonkey

File: charitable_chief.jpg (105KB, 649x607px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 649x607px

>>59401832
>say babay to [...] the SJW
and how will you do that

>>59402226
I guess they will try to add APIs to make it work.

https://wiki.mozilla.org/WebExtensions/Future
"Vimperator/Pentadactyl" is listed under "Interesting Add-ons".

Then again, that page was last modified in August 2015.

Seamonkey and palemoon are the last bastion against freedom from the google botnet.

>>59402709
Don't worry, Microsoft will open-source EdgeHTML and save us, anon.

>>59402675
>Then again, that page was last modified in August 2015.
Exactly
They don't give a fuck
If anything I better they're gonna move to block extensions like this, probably getting money from google to hinder adblock somehow

>>59402709

Not true at all, there's still GNU IceCat, surf, Uzbl, rekonq, and a few others I don't remember right now.

>>59402807
>GNU IceCat
Literally just firefox with different branding you moron

>>59402825
So is Pale Meme.

>>59402877
Palememe is shit as well
We need a new browser thats:
>Open source
>proper extension interface
>Not bloated to all fuck
>No involvement from google

>>59402877
it was, afaik it's been seperate since australis