How do I read this chart?

>>59396206
USB 2.0 is 75% better at fucking your girlfriend. USB 3.0 comes too fast

>>59396206
USB3.0 haz 3/4 market share and it's faster ?

>>59396206
it means it takes 15 minutes to transfer 100GB with usb2.0 and 45 minutes to transfer same amount of data via usb3.0

File: USB3SAUBX.C.jpg (17KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 600x600px

>>59396206
>USB 3.0

U r fukken joken m8

>lies, damn lies, and statistics
>fucked up charts with skewed graphics

USB 2.0 = max of 480 Mbps
USB 3.0 = max of 5 Gbps

5 billion / 480 million != 4 so again the chart's graphics are fucked.

USB 3.0 is roughly - and I say ROUGHLY - 9x faster than USB 2.0 in terms of pure maximum bitrate.

File: usb3-pinout-microb.jpg (16KB, 405x375px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 405x375px

>>59396276
>Designed by a committee
>ISO certified

File: usbpin.jpg (132KB, 1086x678px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 1086x678px

>>59396290

>plug usb 3.0 pendrive into usb 3.0 slot
>plug usb 2.0 HDD into usb 2.0 slot
>transfer same file to both
>HDD receives it twice as quickly
What did they mean by this?

>>59396307
>hdd
found your problem
try again on one of those samsung evo ssds

>>59396278
What makes you think that graph represents bitrate?

>>59396767
"USB 3.0 High Speed Drive have a Faster Data Transfer Speed than USB 2.0 Drive"

>"Faster Data Transfer Speed"