Just found out about this. Let have a dick waving competition.

File: Untitled.jpg (147KB, 831x520px) Image search: [Google]

147KB, 831x520px

>>59396086

Reference RX480

Can't be bothered to take a screenshot, but my R9 290X's ASIC is 78.2%. Highest I've had was 87.something on a GTX 570.

File: Capture.jpg (95KB, 799x488px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 799x488px

>>59396086
fuck me.

>>59396086
I just got one of these. It had horrible coil whine, but I under volted it and gave it a slight OC and the whine disappeared.

File: Screen Shot 2017-03-14 at 5.44.26 AM.png (264KB, 1614x1198px) Image search: [Google]

264KB, 1614x1198px

EVGA GTX 980 SuperClocked

File: kek.png (173KB, 347x425px) Image search: [Google]

173KB, 347x425px

>>59396086
>>59396144
>>59396188
>>59396254
>>59396351
>all these cucks below 80%
kek

>>59396569
you do realize that the number is entirely arbitrary and is only valid for comparing between chips of the same family? There are some out there which go above 100%. Now go back to crying that you have a 7 year old mid end GPU

File: asic.jpg (142KB, 785x495px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 785x495px

decent

>>59396086
>asic quality not supported on this card
oh o-okay

File: ss (2017-03-14 at 01.55.25).png (104KB, 770x476px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 770x476px

>>59396086
It doesn't overclock too well, though it undervolts almost as low as the BiOS can go

File: 300.png (58KB, 779x490px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 779x490px

>>59397123
could be worse

File: Capture.jpg (101KB, 806x495px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 806x495px

Sapphire R9 380X

File: Greens2.gif (111KB, 780x496px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 780x496px

>>59396086
Do I win?