Google's new censorship program

File: toxic.png (10KB, 583x274px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 583x274px

If this is the case, I'll welcome it with open arms. 4chan will finally be delisted in google searches.
Bye bye normalfags.

File: Perspective.png (9KB, 299x148px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 299x148px

Well shoot, what an interesting Perspective.

wanting to gas the kikes is stupid kill yourself

>>59395661
Nobody cares about your shitty memes, fuck off

This is what Harmful Opinions was talking about when during the whole Candid shitstorm.

>>59395661
>>>/pol/

>>59395752
why?

File: Bildschirmfoto 2017-03-14 um 11.14.05.png (66KB, 1342x412px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 1342x412px

Can anyone go above 97%

File: 8chan.png (4KB, 287x131px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 287x131px

>>59396094
lmao

>>59396106
kek

infinity chan is extremely toxic, tho.
Their /pol/ board is just too fucking much.

>>59395661
Soon enough whole Internet will become as castrated and politically correct as League of Legends.

You won't be able to write fuck without being permanently banned from your google account or google search.

I guess I'm kinda happy. During my lifetime I will be forced out of the Internet so I can start doing some sports to lose my beer belly.

File: Capture+_2017-03-14-12-30-44.png (114KB, 720x1200px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 720x1200px

I cannot get it to go any higher

File: 99.png (6KB, 639x131px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 639x131px

>>59396096

File: Screenshot from 2017-03-14 21-06-24.png (7KB, 300x149px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 300x149px

>>59395661
gays confirmed toxic

File: Screenshot from 2017-03-14 21-07-28.png (6KB, 317x132px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 317x132px

>>59396269
Machine learning to be banned due to homophobia

File: Perspective.png (9KB, 380x184px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 380x184px

>>59395661
Google sure puts things into "perspective".

>>59396300
obsessed

File: Capture.png (4KB, 266x106px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 266x106px

>>59396300
kek

File: Capture.png (5KB, 440x217px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 440x217px

Of course.

File: NK.png (6KB, 370x147px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 370x147px

>>59395661

File: toxic.png (34KB, 645x531px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 645x531px

Aiming for lowest score.

File: d7b9bf0fe26027ed43825e8e4f5f0668.png (7KB, 742x179px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 742x179px

i did it bois

File: toxic.png (43KB, 658x650px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 658x650px

Mandatory.

File: ad.png (4KB, 338x182px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 338x182px

>>59396353

>>59396421
impeccable

File: Screenshot_2017-03-14-11-54-46-639_org.mozilla.firefox.png (124KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 1080x1920px

>>59396458

File: toxic-00.png (54KB, 638x491px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 638x491px

Appears to be working.

Caps and multiple exclamation marks seem to increase the score

What I think might be interesting is to see how the 'Policitcal correctness' landscape changes over time would be to to do a toxicity check of Mein Kampf every 12 months. Because of 'machine learning' (yeh right), googles opinion will change over time

"Fuck off" gives 99% toxicity.

I win.

>>59396780
>>59396421

>>59395691
this seems more like something to finally shut up the stupid /pol/ memespouters in YouTube comments.

>>59396812
I still win because fuck you.

>>59396824
Then they'll move to constructive comments, based on evidence and citation.
It'll only work in their favor.

File: hmmm.png (15KB, 733x464px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 733x464px

really gets the noggin froggin

>>59396914
>>59396824
Or they'll just put periods and spaces into the bad words to get past the censor

>>59396926
Still, less shitposts will be seen, and the truth will be upvoted more.
Shitposts are the only thing holding back /pol/'s points of order.

File: _20170314_144637.jpg (36KB, 1440x529px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 1440x529px

>>59396961

"I agree, the solution is definitely to gas the kikes, it is obvious that this is not only going to improve the world, but create a safe environment for all."

>>59397059
Good job Google.

>>59396127
>League of Legends
>politically correct

When it comes to League that game deserves all the censorship it can get. I don't know why but it somehow only attracts the worst of humanity.

>>59397087
Try becoming literate before you shitpost

File: Capture.png (7KB, 769x201px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 769x201px

>>59395661
do I win something

File: alternative facts.png (5KB, 736x165px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 736x165px

>>59397115
yeah, I fucked up the spelling and noticed it right after, but it stays the same if you fix it.

>>59397122
It's still wrong

>>59397132
Nah, that's how it's spelled

File: 1489493329915.png (2KB, 329x120px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 329x120px

>>59395661
What the fuck.

>>59396324
considering that the US population is 13.3% black, that's not a bad guess by google

>>59397181
Are you sure about that?

Yes
Vacuums is right

File: thanks google.png (14KB, 646x188px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 646x188px

>>59397186
>"This is good enough, Pajeet. Roll it out."

>>59395691
>4chan will finally be delisted in google searches.

4chan is an enormous data mine for google, they'd never cut it off because of all the info they get from users here.

>>59396094
>>59396106
8gag doesn't use google scripts of course.

freedomhosting 34% kek

File: ss (2017-03-14 at 13.15.35).png (3KB, 278x118px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 278x118px

>>59396336

File: mra.png (5KB, 689x100px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 689x100px

>>59397249
man this is so shit

>windows: 3%
>linux: 2%
>BSD: 34%
wew

34% seems to be the I don't know what this is rating.

>>59395661
This will lead to the end of the free Internet where you could still afford to express your opinion once in a while, or call someone an asshole once.

Sites will adapt a default "0% toxicity" attitude and all you'll be reading is going to be manufactured garbage, people who are too afraid to take a stance, pick a side and defend what they believe is correct. Shills will rule the internet communities.
This will limit the sites you could still express yourself honestly down to a handfull, all owned by paid shills.

>>59396116
Their /pol/ board is just way too extreme, so props for that.

captcha: grabenstein cottage

>>59397298
Except it doesn't even conform to the ideals of the strawmen you're blaming this on. This shit is just straight-up inaccurate no matter your viewpoints.

>>59397318
Duh, it's still in it's infancy.
Wich is why it's a good idea to give it the old Tay treatment. If this thing is left alone to be taught by sjw how to censor us, we'll have to rely on stegano to post shit without being ghosted by the machines. Imagine a future where everybody uses the meme full width characters so they don't get censored by a bot.
Better it goes to shit and google just folds the idea.

>>59397365
its*

>>59396421
Very good.

>>59396079
Not him, and I fucking hate /pol/tards, but OP is talking about censorship. We need to be able to express opinions regardless of other people to consider them "tawksy" or whatever.

Remember that plugin for some text editor some guy made that automatically "corrected" shit like master/slave or cursing? This shit makes me so irrationally fucking angry, to the point I'm not actually interested in making any logical arguments against it because my brain doesn't understand why I'd have to and why people are developing this retarded ass bullshit.

>>59397290
The internet is going to eventually be censored. I want to hoard data that could not be available when this day comes.
Honestly whenever this does happen I am moving on and spending my time outdoors.

>>59397424
>being a le classical liberal xd

There's just no space for you all these days. Your ideology is antiquated and just one big platitude. Embrace the /pol/ my man.

>>59397290
Your little dystopia there is how things already feel. I can't tolerate any other website than 4chan anymore.

>>59397453
Grow up, populist.

Blank spaces are 12% likely to be toxic
A bunch of blank spaces are considered an unknown language

File: tmp_9812-SmartSelectImage_2017-03-14-08-43-191097775783.png (39KB, 1092x554px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 1092x554px

uhh 99% toxic?
that seems wrong to me

>>59397459
That might be because you're actually allergic to different viewpoints and prefer to stay in your /pol/ safe space.

>>59395661
It's a wrongthink robot. Dear god.

>>59397453
>>being a le classical liberal xd
I don't know what's more stupid - your imbecile conclusion I would be a "classical liberal" based on ZERO information, or your failure to realize the issue with free speech.

You could contribute for a smarter humankind by removing yourself from the gene pool. Just sayin'. [spoiler]This got 13%[/spoiler]

File: arstechnica.jpg (248KB, 1001x652px) Image search: [Google]

248KB, 1001x652px

America was founded on hate speech.

The hate speech written by Thomas Jefferson is some of the greatest hate speech ever written.

>>59397513
test post

File: tmp_9812-1488173655213-201855765.jpg (61KB, 800x478px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 800x478px

>>59397513
Kek then I'd leave 4chan and spend all my time on rightist subreddits or whatever. I'm arguing with you right now. How much of a "safe space" is that?

My main board is /int/ which isn't very /pol/ at all, just dumb memes.

>>59397563
Good, then you're just like me, who's problem isn't the inability to tolerate discourse but a fetish for discourse to the point where no other community likes me anymore.

4chan ruined my life.

>>59397493
31%
>>59397453
32%
>>59397424
74%

Someone should make a post filter using the perspective api
the >30% ones are almost always off topic shitposts

>>59397531
A real liberal would be against censorship and the fascist policing of the web.

>>59397531
whomst are you quoting

File: pakis.png (19KB, 741x414px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 741x414px

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A3yCcXgbKrE

File: me irl.png (23KB, 699x268px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 699x268px

I think you can get down to below 20% by carefully choosing your words, no matter what you write. Not sure if this is intended.

>>59397579
Don't use "fascist" like it's a synonym for authoritarian

>>59397586
fucking kek

>>59397523
or maybe you're just a piece of shit

>>59397595
It all leads back to George Soros. Nazi collaborator and real life Bond villain.

File: e288e44144001c9db28baf0e07cfc62cdc7048b25709bae214f0ab71853c3531.png (145KB, 500x619px) Image search: [Google]

145KB, 500x619px

>>59397583

>>59397573
I just want less rulecuckery

>>59397624
Are normalshits stealing wojak now too

>>59397635
They've done so for ages.

File: 1300044776986[1].jpg (17KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 250x250px

>>59397635
>>59397646

>DO I FIT IN YET

no

>>59397657
geh nach reddit

File: _20170314_205558.jpg (50KB, 1080x650px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 1080x650px

>>59395661
IT KNOWS

>>59397680
no, 34% is the percentage it assigns to anything it doesn't know about.

>>59397695
so it's essentially assuming something about human nature by default then, any random statement has a 34% chance to be toxic which means 34% original sin

>>59397620
It could say that I'm the second coming of Christ and I'd still agree with that other anon that it's a wrongthink robot. Who controls the metrics for gauging toxicity? How easy is it to modify those metrics? Those are the first questions that come to my mind. The next questions is: do you really think it's a good thing that society is at a place where it requires a corporation to act as a filter for internet communication because some people can't handle it when others express negative emotion? The first problem is that it's essentially a ban on negative emotion. Do you think that only affects assholes? The second part goes back to the first two questions I asked; the people in control of a system like this will always be a concern to me, but putting it in the hands of a business is probably a worst case scenario.

I can only hope that most people look at this thing and think "that's fucking stupid, no thanks"

>>59397579
>A real liberal would be against censorship and the fascist policing of the web.
A will necessarily be B does NOT mean C is also A because C is B. Basic logic.

>>59397583
>whomst* are you quoting
Not sure if trolling, but I quoted his meme arrow and its implications.

*EPIC MEME! I bet you must be from some memeland like /r/9fag, am I right? How cool!

>>59397427
Sorry I can't see your post because its
>>89% likely to be perceived as "toxic"

>>59395661
Google is a company who can decide whatever it wants to do with its property. If you don't like it don't use it.
Simples.

>>59395752
I agree, we should put them in labour camps and work them to death

>>59395691
This to be fucking honest niggerpai. If you don't see this as anything but a boon, you're a filthy political newfag.

>>59397721
>34% original sin
They know.
SHUT IT DOWN

File: Untitled-1.jpg (32KB, 712x268px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 712x268px

Great algorithm, Google.

>>59397761
>retarded alt-right 13 year olds will stop flooding 4chan

One can only dream.

File: 20170314_180557.png (79KB, 1080x742px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 1080x742px

>>59395661
It is intelligent though

good lord I got 10 (yous) in the last 30 minutes on this thread, I'm doing great today and it's only 9

File: Untitled.png (6KB, 764x188px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 764x188px

fucking bigots

>>59397747
>muh libertarianism
>muh liberty
>muh free market

You do realize that their intended use for this is to embed it in forums so that when you try to post, it tells you not to be an asshole and rejects your post until you write it with flowery enough language that you don't make anyone feel bad, right?

No, of course you didn't because you're a fucking idiot. Simples.

>>59397800
If you don't like it, don't use it moron.

>>59397800
>internet is so fucking big you can create your own little safe spaces where things you don't agree with will never surface
>REEEEE WHY CAN'T THIS BE EVERYWHERE REEEE

kys

>>59397779
Yeah younger gen Z is based as hell I've been noticing

>>59397821
>t. gen z embryo

>>59397812
Dumb useless statement

>>59396079
Here's the problem. /pol/ is just a dump of bigoted conspiratards posting vile crap 24/7 and this topic should have the right to be talked about on another board for those who want to discuss censorship while still avoiding /pol/.

>>59397836
Dumb useless cuck.

Go make your own forum where you can circlejerk yourself instead of yelling at people doing whatever the fuck they want with private property.

I'm unironically using this shit to improve my insults.

File: scrot_20170314_141748.png (11KB, 631x108px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 631x108px

How is that toxic?

>>59397910
The program looks for certain keywords to classify your text as toxic, since it's unable to understand discourse.

>>59396116
Their /pol/ is no fun allowed.

>>59397933
In other words: It's literally no better than a 15 year old word filter.
News at 11.

>>59397857
Not the one you're quoting, but

>cuck
Boat/pol/ple should go back to their cage-board while serious people discuss stuff.

>>59397812
>>59397819
>if you don't like this, don't use it

I don't get to choose which sites it's embedded in. I also don't get to choose whether or not it's used to analyze the papers I write for university as an additional grading metric. Or if the government begins using it for various communications.

>own little safe spaces where things you don't agree

How do you misconstrue the meaning of a safe space that badly? I don't want safe spaces; I'm arguing directly against safe spaces. I don't want some automaton becoming popular enough that I encounter it on a daily basis deciding whether or not I'm allowed to say what I want to say. It probably wouldn't affect me much, but I'm still opposed to it on principle. It's too easy to abuse something like that.

>>59397857
>muh private property

Ahhh, just like those companies that got paid off by the CIA to keep security vulnerabilities open were doing what they want with private property and we should all just fuck off! You know, when people who hold more power than you are staunchly rejecting the notion of public responsibility, you're not supposed to advocate on their behalf. You've been brainwashed by the multinational corporate media machine. There's a happy medium, but you've got no idea where it is. Great job, Tim!

>>59397974
>people discuss stuff
You mean shitpost about different topics.

>>59397944
B-but MUH NEURAL NETWORK!

I did some tests; word order affects a bit the score, so it is not _just_ keywords. Still, unable to understand meaning, and to be quite honest I don't expect a machine doing that in our lifetimes.

>>59397992
>implying 4chan is _only_ shitpost
Were you surprised yesterday, when you just entered this website for the first time?

>>59397857
you go make your own fucking forum of the type you love so much where you wait for 10 years for a moderator to approve your request for account creation, spend another 10 years making stupid unfunny but harmless jokes to gain karma or whatever other goodboy point system, and always make sure to toe the line. oh yeah and no cursing. if you support such a niggerlicious model for a website you should go to one and leave here.

>>59397989
>I don't get to choose which sites it's embeded in
Yes you do the internet is vast and limitless

>I also don't get to choose whether or not it's used to analyze the papers I write for University
If it bothers you so much, quit.

>Or if the government begins using it for various communications.
Kek no, even if they did who the fuck cares what some public servant thinks.

>>59398017
I don't need to though. I'm not the one complaining retard, you are.

So leave and make your own forum and talk to yourself.

>>59398021
nigga go troll somewhere else

>>59398029
no I won't, because I already have my preferred type of forum, 4chan. you obviously don't prefer it so fuck off.

>>59398029
>>59398017
are you guys doing some kind of subtle performance art where you're trying to blow up that AI with your sub-par discussion, or do you just need to fuck off to /pol/ and tumblr?

if it's the former: gas the fucking kikes, kill al white people you give me cancer off yourself nigger

>>59398044
>trolling
>Muh google is destroying muh free speech
If you don't like it, stop using google and their services/visiting websites that use their services/make your own internet site that you can do whatever the fuck you want on.

Only children complain about things they aren't entitled to.

>>59398072
>Performance art
>Google don't like tings
>google delet
>retards get mad instead of not using google

Gonna keep posting this until retards get it.

Guys, /pol/ is not the problem. The normalfags who infect /pol/ are the problem and need to be purged.

>>59398076
nigga did i not just tell you

>>59398072
>I am so mature I don't have ANY ideology or ANYTHING worthwhile to say

>>59398102
I'm not a nigger though kike, can you disconnect from the internet instead of complaining about shitposting on 4chan for the billionth time?

>>59398098
this

>>59398115
>Look at me, I'm so special because I mindlessly follow groupthink on the internet.

Kek, never ever notice the irony of their own posts these embyros.

File: riiiiiiight.jpg (19KB, 691x299px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 691x299px

What does this mean?

File: Untitled.jpg (9KB, 294x143px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 294x143px

is google redpilled?

>>59398182
Google is moneypilled

>>59398157
who the fuck said I did that? I just hate centrists and moderates. I have my own thing and it's unique, but rest assured it's quite extremist.

>>59398227
>It's unique

HAHAHHAHAHAHA is that what these retards actually think?

Quite easy.
"Fuck fuck fuck" gives you 100%

>>59398098
>>59398135
Nah, the real problem is some of the sperglords on 4chan are so socially inept that they can't establish a reasonable framework for their opinions so when they say things that they genuinely think are reasonable, they have no ability to understand how insane they sound.

It's one part sperglord, one part troll, one part middling intellectual capacity.

>>59398239
you don't even know me man

>>59398227
>I'm a special snowflake everybody notice me!

Ahhh never change, embryos

>>59398258
I'm sorry did you think you were special?
Nobody cares.

>>59397523
It's over boys, ALTWEB when?

File: wew.png (6KB, 468x140px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 468x140px

W E W
E W E
W E W

I wish everyone using the word 'toxic' in a context not related to chemistry would be gassed.

>>59398319
this

>>59395661
I can imagine the near future
>youtube comments won't be posted unless it is less than 10% toxic
>same with facebook, google+ and reddit
>infact chrome automatically blocks any site which does not use this plugin
This is why we need zeronet lads.

File: blacks.png (8KB, 563x113px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 563x113px

>>59395661

>>59398319
So you just want them to learn the true meaning of "toxic?"

>>59398350
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LOZuxwVk7TU

>>59398319
This, words cannot hurt you, but lots of chemicals sure can.

>>59398319
Sim sim salabim!

File: 1489499915184.png (24KB, 976x390px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 976x390px

>>59395661
Who the fuck is going to use this?

>>59397845
Anon, I can understand the /pol/ hate, the front page is retarded. However, if you do a /pol/<relevanttopic> such as syrian civil war, hearings, north korea television, nice debates etc, many threads are absolutely useful. Not all /pol/ users are bad.

>>59398381
>post rejected
>toxicity level too high

>>59398393
>not all fascists are bad

ok, anon

>>59398409
What I am saying is not all of /pol/ are fascists .
I browse /pol/ the most in 4chan (I hide all retard threads like nazi, "muh racemixing is bad", "trump general") and the specific threads I visit are nice and informative.

>>59398409
That's not what he said and /pol/ isn't just fascists. But since you trained yourself to see fascism everywhere and to react in an aggressive manner, you're unable to see past them and can't use /pol/ as the valuable tool that it is.
And just for you, I'm not saying that there's not a lot of fascists lurking on /pol/.

>>59398434
>>59398466
relax anons i was fucking with you

I hope they gas goyim and pajeets. They're subhumans.

>>59398466
I'm not. Jews are superior, people who hate Jews are shit.

File: _20170314_151107.jpg (56KB, 1080x592px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 1080x592px

>>59395661

>>59398409
fascism is an early 20th century ideology that came about as a counter to marxism and capitalism. it's about understanding that the world has changed and there's no going back, but not going full force into postmodernism and materialism.

fascist is not a word you use to describe racists, authoritarians, protectionists, jingoists, or anything else. a fascist might be one or all of those things seperately, but "fascism" simply refers to a more specific thing than everyone seems to think.

it reminds me of
>...as when phenomena of the Classical Age that are not only extremely complex but utterly alien to us are labelled with modern catchwords like Socialism, Impressionism, Capitalism, Clericalism
from spengler

File: _20170314_151440.jpg (42KB, 1080x474px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 1080x474px

>>59395661
Hmm

>>59398581
perfect

So, I wonder if that feedback system is looked at by a bunch of humans.
Because if it isn't we could just spam our *narrative* and tell it that it's not toxic.

Any insights on this?

File: perspective.jpg (42KB, 936x262px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 936x262px

Fucking christ, they show off right here EXACTLY why this is an awful idea.

Every one of these "good" comments are SAYING LITERALLY NOTHING. there are no opinions here, there isn't any fucking discourse at all.

>>59398570
>fascist is not a word you use to describe racists, authoritarians, protectionists, jingoists, or anything else.

It is now though. And it's fucking horrible to watch how fast language changes meaning these days. It just becomes meaningless this way.

File: perspective2.jpg (76KB, 703x715px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 703x715px

>>59398654
PISSING ASS BASTARD I chose the wrong picture

>>59398319
biochemistry*

>>59398654
I would argue that that's exactly the point

>>59398659
It's really not a language thing so much as it is a historical term inaccuracy thing.

>>59395661
Holy fucking shit, I hope nobody ever uses this. Most sites fucking suck because everyone's too terrified to act provocative. Look at any argument on reddit or especially stackexchange websites. People make an incredibly simple point, but they have to fill it with 500 words of 'not to offend you but just in case maybe possibly probaby some people might maybe think that in some cases it could be seen as possibly maybe that you're wrong. or you could be right.' Because they don't want to be seen as 'toxic.' When on 4chan where there's none of that shit, people just say 'you're wrong.'

This will murder any kind of internet discussion even further than upvotes/downvotes/likes/shares do.

How long until someone puts the Bible or Quran through this thing, offends a bunch of entitled religious man children, and gets the whole idea scrapped due to bad publicity?

>>59398681
Yeah I guess you're right in this specific case.
It's (what I was ranting about) just something that annoys me in general and all its forms.

>>59398725
>religious people ruin something good once again
Remind me again why religion is even still a thing, anons.

>>59398725
You know, you can just go and 'adjust' it so that won't happen again.
Or don't, depending on what kind of narrative is favored at that time.

File: Screenshot_20170314_073123.png (26KB, 671x290px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 671x290px

I think I won.

File: _20170314_153410.jpg (35KB, 1080x447px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 1080x447px

>>59398794
What about bringing back 1337?

>>59398794
Yeah it really values tone, not content or context.

File: League.png (6KB, 841x143px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 841x143px

>4 percent

>>59398725
Probably never. No one cares what white Christians think about anything.

>>59398767
People believing in Christianity sure beats people being zealots for Progressivism or something. At least Christians kept niggers and Muslims away for a long time.

>>59398822
It's a glorified spam filter, so obviously classic spam techniques are a good idea.

>>59398706
>people just say you're wrong
More like say you're a nigger

>>59398826
>At least Christians kept niggers and Muslims away for a long time.
Yeah, they also kept Europe in dark ages for centuries and then plunged us in inner wars.

Also,
>niggers
Nice edge, you asshole.

>>59398846
You're a nigger!

(oh shit, I created a paradox)

>>59398826
>the guy who comes up to defend xtianity turns out to be racist and intolerant
Hah, colour me surprised!

>>59398870
>implying keeping the muslims out of the Holy Roman Empire was racist when Islam was (and still is) incompatible with the ideals of the west

>>59398826
What about, the left getting offended on behalf of Muslims?

>>59398910
Seems wrong doesn't it
Report it as such

>>59398855
>they also kept Europe in dark ages
There's a reason why historians no longer refer to the Middle Ages as the "Dark Ages", because idiots like you think it means that it was somehow a terrible time.

You are a retard and you have no idea what you're talking about. Christianity allowed people in this time to perform autopsies on bodies and made it illegal for people to marry their cousins, two things that made western civilization better. Compare the areas today that had Christianity during the middle ages and areas that didn't. Fucking moron.

>>59398870
>Christianity means being a cuck
lol m8

>>59398319
this

>>59398897
>Islam was (and still is) incompatible with the ideals of the west
So is Christianity, you idiot. The ideals we follow today of Liberty, Equality and Fraternity come from the French Revolution, which was 100% a reaction to Christian anti-scientific medieval tenets.

>>59398935
>There's a reason why historians no longer refer to the Middle Ages as the "Dark Ages"
Yes, neoconservative revisionism.

>>59399022
>the French Revolution, which was 100% a reaction to Christian anti-scientific medieval tenets.
No, it was a reaction to Monarchy.

>we follow today of Liberty, Equality and Fraternity
Where do you imagine the "equality" part comes from, lad? Where did the idea that "all men are equal" come from? You're a moron.

>>59399041
>No, it was a reaction to Monarchy.
Read a history book anytime, son.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dechristianization_of_France_during_the_French_Revolution

File: .png (11KB, 348x112px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 348x112px

TRIGGERED

>>59399064
BTFO

>>59399049
Mhm.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abolition_of_feudalism_in_France

>>59399041
>xtianity teaches equality
Wow, you're ignorant!

>>59397059
If you put "Thank you for reading" at the end it goes from 4% to 2%

>>59396127
the internet died when they introduced the black santa emoji

>>59396106
>>59396116
>>59397296
>>59397937
half chan BTFO

>>59399089
Christianity is the source of the myth of equality among men and the myth of human lives being more important than any other animal. This is why I can never be a Christian.

>I hate bullies like you - 90%
>I beg your pardon, I consider myself a freedom fighter. A misunderstood one. - 2%

Mei status: [x] told

File: gasthekikes.png (13KB, 590x142px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 590x142px

kek

>>59399041
>Where do you imagine the "equality" part comes from, lad? Where did the idea that "all men are equal" come from? You're a moron.

I hate speaking about something what I never researched but I heard Bible says some weird things about gays and forceful conversion.

>>59399153
>Christianity is the source of the myth of equality among men

>"Women are to be silent in the churches. They are not permitted to speak, but must be in submission, as the Law says. 35If they wish to inquire about something, they are to ask their own husbands at home; for it is dishonorable for a woman to speak in the church." (1 Corinthians 14:34)

Yeah sure...

>and the myth of human lives being more important than any other animal
That is true though.

>>59399022
The Great Masonic Chimpout was a mistake

>>59399215
You mean the American Revolution?

>>59399212
>>"Women are to be silent in the churches. They are not permitted to speak, but must be in submission, as the Law says. 35If they wish to inquire about something, they are to ask their own husbands at home; for it is dishonorable for a woman to speak in the church."

Typical, out-of-context nonsense. These are words of Paul talking about proto-gnosticism and the matriarchal cult of artemis in Ephesus. Women would attend church simply to disrupt the teachings. Again, you don't know what you're talking about.

>>59399207
>I hate speaking about something what I never researched
You can stop there, pal.

File: IYaQzfj.png (78KB, 767x703px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 767x703px

Joseph Goebbels sportpalast speech calling for a total war.

"Ich frage euch: Wollt ihr den totalen Krieg?"

File: bean.png (9KB, 637x185px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 637x185px

>>59395661
Markov chains were better than this new-fangled tensor-meme shit.

>>59399305
kek

>>59395661
"Toxic" and political correctness just means anything the establishment doesn't want you to say or think.

>background color of textfield is set to white but font color is managed by the systemsettings
i hate it when websites do this

>>59399388

/*
* Use this css file to eliminate problems in Firefox
* when using dark themes that create dark on dark
* input boxes, selection menus and buttons. Put this
* in the ../firefox/default/chrome folder or your
* individual user firefox profile chrome folder.
*/
input {
border: 2px inset white;
background-color: white;
color: black;
-moz-appearance: none !important;
}
textarea {
border: 2px inset white;
background-color: white;
color: black;
-moz-appearance: none !important;
}
select {
border: 2px inset white;
background-color: white;
color: black;
-moz-appearance: none !important;
}
input[type="radio"],
input[type="checkbox"] {
border: 2px inset white ! important;
background-color: white ! important;
color: ThreeDFace ! important;
-moz-appearance: none !important;
}
*|*::-moz-radio {
background-color: white;
-moz-appearance: none !important;
}
button,
input[type="reset"],
input[type="button"],
input[type="submit"] {
border: 2px outset white;
background-color: #eeeeee;
color: black;
-moz-appearance: none !important;
}
body {
background-color: white;
color: black;
display: block;
margin: 8px;
-moz-appearance: none !important;
}

>>59399402
Also name it userContent.css

>>59395752
>wanting to gas the kikes is stupid kill yourself
96% likely to be perceived as "toxic"

>>59397290
>This will lead to the end of the free Internet where you could still afford to express your opinion once in a while, or call someone an asshole once.

This is why Ian Clarke came up with the idea of Freenet during his university days back in the 90s. He was astoundingly prescient in seeing what the internet would ultimately end up like and thus made an un-censorable datastore.

Stop training the neural network you dumbfucks.

File: 34%.png (9KB, 529x161px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 529x161px

>>59399567

>>59399567
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overfitting?

>>59399402
thanks

>>59399567
They trained with data of which they know how toxic it is. We're not training anything.

File: firefox_2017-03-14_08-57-22.png (11KB, 392x334px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 392x334px

really fires up the gas chamber

>>59395661

>"Consensual Sex In The Missionary Position For The Sole Purpose Of Procreating."
>58% toxic


Wew, lads..

>>59396353
>>59396464
Kek

File: interkektion.png (59KB, 552x652px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 552x652px

Doing well there

File: kek.png (5KB, 366x150px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 366x150px

wew

File: Screenshot_2017-03-14_12-22-20.png (34KB, 929x1020px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 929x1020px

>>59395661
they could have used a bit of regex to find offensive words and achieved the exact same thing

every time I type in an insult without swears it doesn't mark it as toxic.

this is probably the most retarded use of AI I've ever seen.

>>59399810
jej

>>59400083
>Java
>python
>not forth
out

File: wip.jpg (29KB, 821x400px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 821x400px

>>59395661
>http://www.perspectiveapi.com

Needs more work, it currently just checks for keywords as part of overall words.

File: fu_test.png (4KB, 283x121px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 283x121px

>>59396228

File: Screenshot_2017-03-14-12-32-25.png (126KB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 1440x2560px

>>59395661
Knew gays were toxic

File: Screenshot_2017-03-14-12-33-25.png (222KB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

222KB, 1440x2560px

>>59400234
Kek

>What if technology could help improve conversations online?
>What if we could convince you to not only let us spy on every little thing you do, to the point of you willingly putting a wiretap in your own home that listens to everything, but to also let us dictate how you speak to others?
We're getting downright Orwellian here

>>59400284
>putting a wiretap in your own home
l-leave my Alexa alone, s-s-she's pure!

>implying people won't invent new words and euphemisms to get around this
It's possibly the most retarded thing google has done.

>>59399567

Not training anything unless pressing "this is wrong" button.

6 street signs pics to post this lol

File: Capture.png (4KB, 448x182px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 448x182px

obligatory

File: tmp_28929-Screenshot_2017-03-14-17-37-59776685112.png (63KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 1080x1920px

java is at 2% and C at 4%

File: file.png (2KB, 273x108px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 273x108px

>>59395661

>>59400341
>java at 2%
>indians

File: file.png (4KB, 459x127px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 459x127px

Well shit 1 time out of 100 this is considered non-toxic

File: kek.gif (7KB, 726x491px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 726x491px

kek

>>59400134
was looking at general programming questions actually, didn't really care about the language, just needed some implementation examples

>>59400318
>6 street signs pics to post this lol
Why don't you use Legacy Captcha from the Settings > Quotes & Replying menu?

File: croppedImage.png (25KB, 1080x594px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 1080x594px

>>59395661

Hmm...

botnet

File: Capture.png (6KB, 664x273px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 664x273px

>>59400483

inb4 trying to teach it "Nigger" isn't toxic

>>59398654
>>59398670
YES, THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT I'M SAYING AS WELL.

Google are trying to stop people from expressing their opinions.

File: IMG_20170314_101205.jpg (149KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 1080x1920px

This things already pretty good

File: 1489511724903.png (7KB, 671x452px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 671x452px

It doesn't work too well.

>>59400731
>hurr durr drumpf bad
>therefore speech policing good

Hey google dev.

File: 1472201533797.gif (44KB, 499x499px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 499x499px

>>59395816
You do.

>>59400787
I think he's trying to say that Google hates "Donald Trump is an unfit president" more than it hates etc.

File: .png (32KB, 689x688px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 689x688px

/G/ IS A TOXIC BOARD.

File: .png (3KB, 274x105px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 274x105px

>>59400824
fucking cunt is lower than vagina

File: asd.png (11KB, 730x508px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 730x508px

oy gevalt this machine is broken
ban dis filth before i sue

File: .png (4KB, 254x115px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 254x115px

anyone else get a 0% phrase?

File: Screenshot_2017-03-14-13-24-52.png (154KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

154KB, 1080x1920px

This "ai" is stupid and just looks for mean words

Maybe instead of these retarded experiments google should invent a way to punch people through the internet. The threat of physical violence is always a deterrent to actual toxicity.

File: IMG_20170314_103007.jpg (61KB, 1080x785px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 1080x785px

I'm okay with this.

File: welp.png (7KB, 649x176px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 649x176px

>>59400811
welp

File: perspectiveapi.png (63KB, 1152x500px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 1152x500px

>>59395661
Uhm... ok i guess?

>>59400918
We can teach this thing to think black people are toxic and white are not

File: IMG_20170314_103819.jpg (32KB, 1080x929px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 1080x929px

>>59401041
SHUT IT DOWN

File: jewgle censor.png (279KB, 599x546px) Image search: [Google]

279KB, 599x546px

>>59395661
I see nothing wrong here.

File: Screenshot from 2017-03-14 18-39-16.png (22KB, 761x200px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 761x200px

>Feedback button
Can this be spammed to break it?

>>59401115
yes

>>59401115
let's go

>>59401154
>>59401179
Test if we can get the score down for something simple
"gas jews"