Thread replies: 15
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
Anonymous
What's a good, encrypted software for group voice calls? 2017-03-14 12:33:55 Post No. 59390458
[Report] Image search: [Google]
What's a good, encrypted software for group voice calls? 2017-03-14 12:33:55 Post No. 59390458
[Report] Image search: [Google]
What's a good, encrypted software for group voice calls?
Anonymous
2017-03-14 12:33:55
Post No. 59390458
[Report]
As titled, what's a good, encrypted, and preferably FLOSS software solution for group voice calls?
>Signal
Doesn't do group voice calls
>Riot/Matrix
Doesn't do encrypted group voice calls
>Discord
Proprietary and not E2E encrypted
Proprietary
>IRC
that's just text senpai
>Telegram
lol
Is my only choice Wire? Are there better options?
>>
Mumble
>>
>>59390466
Wire > Mumble
You don't need to run your own server with Wire
>>
FaceTime is E2E encrypted and supports group calls
:^)
>>
>>59390466
>>59390484
Wait, I need to run a Mumble server myself?
Are there guides for this?
>>
>>59390484
Server side is a black box with wire
Enjoy
>>
>>59390563
Wire is going to open source their server code by the end of 2017 Q1.
Plus the whole point of E2E encryption on the client side (which is open source already) is that you don't have to trust the server at all.
>>
>>59390545
Murmur (mumbles server side) comes with the default installer IIRC
It's by far the easiest server setup I've done. You just need to edit one file.
Mumbles site explains it nicely
>>
>Is my only choice Wire? Are there better options?
Writing your own :^]
>>
Relatedly, are there any good smartphone apps for video call? Google Allo, skype, etc are botnets, wire is clunky, telegram doesn't have video. Currently using snapchat and it's less than ideal
>>
>>59390466
OK, I just tried this, but having to constantly run a server instead of letting all my teammates instantly able to initiate a call/chat seems not good enough for me.
>>
>>59390458
conversations is getting voice calling soon but doesn't have it yet.
Wire is pretty good but i think the server is proprietary.
>>
>>59391122
>Wire is pretty good but i think the server is proprietary.
Again, see:
>>59390591
Wire's server code is going to be open sourced by the end of 2017 Q1. Plus since both text and voice/video calls are encrypted E2E on the client side, you can still communicate securely even with a compromised server.
>>
I wish I understood crypto. I don't understand how the keys are sent in the first packet are not accessible for the server to read. Is there a explainer for total retards like me?
>>
>>59392520
>I wish I understood crypto. I don't understand how the keys are sent in the first packet are not accessible for the server to read. Is there a explainer for total retards like me?
DuckDuckGo public-key/asymmetric cryptography
Thread posts: 15
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1