Is Stylish a botnet?

>>59385244

Osprey

The chromium one has some kind of tracking malware integrated. Immediately remove it

File: 1489024330627.jpg (69KB, 306x331px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 306x331px

If they asked, I'd add them to some private chat and link them shitload of porn.
But they always choose to steal it from me and tying it to my real identity

>>59385261
Fucking this.

http://www.ghacks.net/2017/01/04/major-stylish-add-on-changes-in-regards-to-privacy/#comment-4086083

Gorhill(of ublock and umatrix) examined the extension and it appears to be sending complete urls along with a unique ID to some advertising/analytics company.

The firefox version of the addon is not impacted by this. Mozilla specifically forbids spyware from their site in the first place, if they discover addons abusing tricks to spy anyway they ban them and the dev.

>>59385750
*relieved forehead wipe*
Thank you senpai.

>>59385750
>Mozilla specifically forbids spyware from their site in the first place, if they discover addons abusing tricks to spy anyway they ban them and the dev.
i love mozilla now

>>59385934
I assume you're using the firefox version? Make sure auto-update is disabled just in case. It's not like the extension really needs constant updates anyway.

At some point the current firefox extension will be rendered unusable because Mozilla is switching to webextensions. I expect the chromium version of stylish to be ported over then. I don't know how they're going to handle the spyware part though

>>59386044
Mozilla will ban it, it probably on there watch list and people will break open the extensions code