Is there any reason to still be using FreeBSD now that Btrfs

Btrfs has done what now?

Can I get a rundown on Btrfs? How has it surpassed ZFS?

>>59383674
bsd general?

is netbsd significantly lighter/faster than openbsd and freebsd?

>>59383816
>more features
>can add disks to a raid live
>can change raid level on the fly
>blows out ZFS in performance tests, not a massive memory whore
>stable enough to be used by facebook in prod

>>59383856
from my experience yes, NetBSD has a better default filesystem and feels snappier, too bad you have to compile chromium, if you're ok with firefox it's nice tho

>>59383674
>Btrfs has surpassed ZFS
Children are so fucking annoying.

ZFS is still the only production grade fs that's safe to use.

>>59383857
>Shit no one uses

>stable enough to be used by facebook in prod
LEL

>>59383857
Last I checked, raid 5/6 were still experimental. Has this changed?

>>59383943
No, it's still experimental and btrfs still suffers from heavy fragmentation. Only a retard would use it when ZFS has just as good performance.

BSDBTFOit's over.

>>59383857
There are still problems with raid 3 type schemes. The only truly working schemes are raid 0,1,01,and 10.

Stability is my concern.
BTR has too large an error track record
>Whoops shredded your data, but that's okay, just pull from backup and try again.

>>59383674
If you're going to bait, try something that's controversial at least

>>59383952
>Gets on blower to Apple for BSD defense force reinforcements.