240hz Monitors

>>59383635
blur reduction does the same job
higher resolution is better investment

>>59383635
Great for csgo.

File: ulmb_motion_blur_from_persistence.png (53KB, 655x600px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 655x600px

i have a 144hz display. i can't tell the difference past ~100fps.

240hz would be a waste of money for me, but there probably are people who would benefit from it.

motion blur reduction is more important at this point

60hz motion blur gives me aids

>>59383635
There are going to be some serious deminishing returns eventually. I reckon resolution will be the first thing and then 240 will become standard, though I doubt it will go much higher. It's kind of crazy that we have screens at 240hz while devs are still capping games at 30fps.

>>59384059
30fps looks more cinematic

>>59384059
It's kind of crazy manchildren care thst much about screen refresh rates to begin with.

>>59383635
There was once here a post in which someone ask what was the highest amount of fps one could distinguish.

An anon posted a link to a thread where suppossedly they did test on marines with a light that flickered for a really little time and some could see it while others not. iirc it was around 1/250 seconds.

I'm Currently on my phone, I'll be back with sauce.

>>59384096
How can you not care? The difference is like night and day up to about 100hz.

>>59383912
Spin around in cs go in 100hz then 144hz you can tell. Also the little online test with the space ship you can tell.

>>59383635

Above 100 Hz you're already in diminishing returns area, and you'll be investing ungodly amounts of money in the hardware needed to actually run games at these FPS, all that when most people can't even reliably tell the difference between 120 and 165+ Hz panels.
Same thing with monitor resolution - at normal viewing distances and with a 27"-32" screen, about halfway between 4k and 8k you reach a point where any further increase in pixel pitch will be lost on the human eye.
In other words we've reached the point where any improvements appear increasingly subtle but come at the cost of crippling price and hardware requirements.

File: bleach.png (221KB, 300x2000px) Image search: [Google]

221KB, 300x2000px

>>59384524
5k OLED 240hz 32" gysnc/freesync with ULMB monitors when?

>>59384096
What do you care about?

GIGAHERTZ monitors when?

>he still doesn't own a 8K@265Hz OLED display with strobing backlights and G-Sync

what is wrong with you?

File: 1470781871925.gif (2MB, 330x166px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 330x166px

>>59383635
You can't even see past 30hz. Why are you still falling for this MUH hz

File: hehe he.jpg (4KB, 250x187px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 250x187px

>>59387002
>OLED
>with strobing backlights

>>59383966
I miss my old crt 17" with 200hzish for cheap, fuck the future

oled is the future my friend. Since it gives you almost 0 response times anyways