/g/ood humour thread

File: 1470782338339.jpg (3MB, 1070x3990px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1070x3990px

>>59379179

File: 1481342933746.png (1MB, 445x629px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 445x629px

>>59379194

>>59379194
tldr

File: 1470903727894.png (164KB, 596x689px) Image search: [Google]

164KB, 596x689px

>>59379207

>>59379223
Does anybody fap to their waifu? I probably wouldn't. Just like when I'm dating someone, I always fapped to other people because I didn't want to reduce them to a simple sexual object.

>>59379194
wtf no way anyone could be that stupid

>>59379179
you first

>>59379209
>Our security auditor is an idiot
>[He] has demanded the following within two weeks:
>plain-text passwords for all users
Tl;dr: The CIA has no time to waste.

>>59379262
You underestimate the stupidity of people. I personally try to do my best at work but I can say that 1/4 of everyone I've ever worked with are fucking incompetent, only reason they got their job must've been due to their good social skills.

>>59379194
I don't understand any of this. Someone explain?

>>59379568
Some retard "IT auditor" is asking for information from someone that is impossible to get and even by doing what it took to get the info he's asking for it would have violated some security standards in place. The IT guy continues to be a massive faggot, and then eventually an audit is launched against him, the end.

>>59379194
And now we know how govt is being able to track everyone.

>>59379207
Anybody even ever used BT3.0? It was quite a jump from 2.1 to 4.0/4.1 for consumer electronics though.

Fuck, the Switch is even still 2.1.

>>59379292
kek

>>59379568
The PCI is a serious set of security requirements that anyone dealing with credit card transactions (and online transactions in general) have to be compliant to. If they aren't at least PCI level secure when handling money they're breaking the law.

>>59379292
Only if you have a trash gpu.

File: 2236.png (301KB, 640x970px) Image search: [Google]

301KB, 640x970px

>>59379179

>>59381201
>worgs on my magine :---D

Fuck off, WMP ran better than VLC on weak-ass hardware.
VLC being horribly written is no excuse.

The ONLY legit use I've had for VLC was a backup to play files that MPC never played.
That's happened less than 10 times out of several million.

>>59383580
Best of the thread

>>59383656
I've had multiple cables like the one on the left break just behind the extra bit or even right on it, whereas I've never had an Apple cable fray like that

muh anecdotes

>>59383671
I've had the opposite experience, so I can relate to the meme

muh counter-anecdotes

>>59383693
It would seem we both have autism

>>59381384

Made by salty apple fans that actually want a headphone jack but can't imagine not sucking apple dick?

File: g.png (4KB, 531x90px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 531x90px

>>59383704
>>59383693

File: neetjpboy.jpg (140KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 1024x768px

>>59383851

>>59383851
saved for next banner contest

File: 0013.png (528KB, 645x582px) Image search: [Google]

528KB, 645x582px

>>59379216

File: ed170ed81b0c076f52d39183964e8b75.jpg (120KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 800x800px

>>59384240
>Documents
>Places
This is someone's desktop.

File: fake_hdd.jpg (57KB, 600x800px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 600x800px

>>59379179

>>59386327
I'm strangely into this...

File: file.png (28KB, 680x501px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 680x501px

>>59386164

>>59386327
the fucking sexual fetishes this place is giving me

i want to ride to end

>>59386413
Thanks.

>>59381384
>Still no microSD

>>59386560
Just use a monospace font.

>>59379216
>>59379237
>>59379270
>>>/leddit/

>>59386560
Nigger that was my post

>>59386719
Maybe, but your post triggered my autism.

>>59379237
how do you do this correctly?
asking for a friend

>>59379568
the auditor was testing him, had he sent the stuff the audit would have failed

>>59386854
negative check to not make a condition mountain

>>59383621
topkek

>>59386854
Why not testing if the variable is unset rather than set. If so, just return the proper error message.

>>59386901
>>59386923
can you please post an example

>>59386413
>root
>god
triggered

>>59386970

if (usernameCorrect(userName)) {
    if (passwordCorrect(passWord)) {
       return true;
    }
}

if (!usernameCorrect(userName)) {
    return false;
}
if (!passwordCorrect(passWord)) {
   return false;
}
return true;

>>59387985

return usernameCorrect() && paswordCorrect();

>>59388098
>Not knowing which one in incorrect

Code monkey revealed himself.

>>59388297
Youre returning a boolean, you dont know which is incorrect either. Hence i showed you the right way of returning easy shit.

Codemonkey 

>>59388359
I'm returning nothing, wrong anon, anon. But you have to refactor your shit to have a proper error handling, while >>59387985 is future proof.

But you're right, your skillz are so l33t.

>>59388098
Your optimization is valid in this simplified case but misses the point of my post.

>>59379216
>THE dracula
Somehow that made me laugh

File: 1438325665184.png (189KB, 1600x834px) Image search: [Google]

189KB, 1600x834px

Does anyone remember that night some years ago when /g/ raided a bunch of google drive documents?

>>59388985
kek

>>59388946
Yeah I understood what you meant, if you actually were to create custom errors instead of a boolean scenario yours would be better.

>>59385169
at least you got some grade A(tm) chinese steel