This shit's completely useless.

nice thread, care to elaborate?

>>59374461
>same download speeds as firefox's built-in downloader
>can't pause/resume any downloads that firefox itself won't resume
>batch downloading already built into firefox

All it does is sit there and waste resources, doing the same things firefox already does.

>>59374504
hmm, I tend to get faster download speeds because of sequential downloading. I've also been able to resume downloads that firefox alone hasnt been able to.
not sure if you're just plain trolling or trying to troll people into shilling dta for you. either way, good job.

>>59374418
Dude it's great for archiving entire porno threads
I don't know about other uses because all I use it for is literally porn

aria2 master race

>>59374418
I use it, I find it very useful.

>>59374418
When will they change that terrible logo?
I bet it's been made in Gimp.

>>59374743
>Dude it's great for archiving entire porno threads
Firefox can do this by itself.

>>59374743
THIS!!!

>>59374763
same here, I use uget to integrate it into chrome

>>59375227
>using shitfox
>using liberal malware

>>59375227
Having to ctrl+select each item in a 150 limit thread while dta does it for you?

>>59375227
>Firefox can do this by itself.
How?

>>59374504
>same download speeds as firefox's built-in downloader
What did you expect faglord?

>can't pause/resume any downloads that firefox itself won't resume
what?

>batch downloading already built into firefox
Nope

>>59375227
How though

>>59375537
>>59375513
>get 4chan x
>press 'e'
>right click > view page info > media tab > save as

>>59375530
>What did you expect faglord?
Something like this:
>DownThemAll is all you can desire from a download manager: it features an advanced accelerator that increases speed up to 400%, it allows you to pause and resume downloads at any time and, last but not least, it's fully integrated into your favorite browser!

>>batch downloading already built into firefox
>Nope
See above, inbred.

>>59375572
>>right click > view page info > media tab > save as
It includes all kinds of crap such as the mascot, favicons, buttons, recaptcha or the banner.

>>59375657
So does dta. What's your point?

>>59375686
DTA allows for filters

>>59375718
That's not worth installing such a bloated and ugly addon for. I can select all the files I want and none that I don't in a couple seconds.

>>59375788
You can select 150 images minus the other shit in seconds. I call bullshit.

>>59376028
I have no idea what you're trying to say.

>>59376210
What if you want to download only gifs?

>>59376210
Let's say a page has 150 images. He's saying that with DTA you can download all of the images (with filtering) with minimal effort. Doing this manually would be painful.

>>59377868
Why not just download them and delete the ones you don't want afterwards?

File: 1480246111151.gif (3MB, 377x372px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 377x372px

>>59375411
So you don't even know about shift-select.

>>59377908
Thats fine if theyre grouped up without other shit in the way. I've never tried it this way so I don't know how the grouping of a chan thread is organized. Will check it when I get back to pc.

Not quite, it's actually very useful!

>>59378737
So you don't even know about control-shift-select.

File: DownThemAll.png (46KB, 675x575px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 675x575px

>>59374418
No, it's not.

It can accelerate your download speed, when server limits upload per socket, so you can use many segments to get omit this limit.

It has builin filters to speed up downloading only chosen multimedia without useless files.

There is also even AntiContainer to get behind containers crap.

>>59374418
maybe for you... :^)

>>59379192
Firefox does download acceleration now.

>>59379255
Never heard of this feature to be builin into Firefox, care to elaborate? As I didn't saw anything like this feature implanted, when I was downloading files with internal downloader.

>>59379255
Nothing on Bugzilla and in Changelog. What's your source for this?

>>59379288
That dta was never ever faster than firefox what anything I've downloaded.

>>59379295
For me it was working perfectly, especially in download accelerator days (2000 era), now it's kinda obsolete as mostly everyone uses CDN. But still DownThemAll! is a great extension if you want to every image or even linked file on some page in one fell swoop and all these magic filters are superior.

I am using IDM senpai. Same shit

>>59379255
How about stop spreading misinformation on internet?

File: .png (231KB, 2560x1533px) Image search: [Google]

231KB, 2560x1533px

>>59379337
>and all these magic filters are superior
Are you serious? All it does is filter by "type". How is this any different to firefox itself?

>>59379385
How about stop shilling placebo shitware?

>you are not allowed to like stuff I don't like
fuck off op, go suck a dick

>>59379390
I should know that he is a Windows user

>>59379390
>Are you serious? All it does is filter by "type". How is this any different to firefox itself?
I can choose 2-3 types and this will be my filter, I use this filter on website pages with 1s.
In your way I will need to do it manually, selecting files etc.
Why not using automatic process when is available? It saves my time and do the same faster.

>>59379390
>How about stop shilling placebo shitware?
The only shill is OP, which down know how to use this extension. Looks like internal Firefox downloader is for him.

>>59379390
On some URLs you will download tons of shit, that's why filters exist, like omit files less than 1KB etc.
Also your way won't download filers behind containers. That's why AntiContainer exists.

>>59377877
Why the fuck would you do that?

>>59379504
exactly, this is just waste of time

>>59379443
>I can choose 2-3 types and this will be my filter, I use this filter on website pages with 1s.
Maybe you should stop being retarded and learn how to control click and shift click.

>The only shill is OP
What am I exactly shilling for?

>>59379471
>omit files less than 1KB etc.
Did you even open the image?

>>59379504
>>59379516
Why the fuck wouldn't you? There's literally no difference.

How am I the shill?

>>59379537
>control click and shift click
Sorry, but I can do it faster with that extension. I'm not seeing your point, when I do the same thing, but just faster. Care to elaborate?

Also you will not download files in containers your way, like mentioned. >>59379471

>>59379537
you are shill and DTA hater
just look on your posts

>>59374504
>>batch downloading already built into firefox
Yeah, nah it isn't.

>>59379537
There is difference!
I will waste my time!

>>59379571
I don't see the point of installing a resource hog to save 2-3 seconds doing something I'll only do once every couple months at the most either. Guess we'll just have to agree to disagree.

And I don't think I've ever ran into containers. I honestly don't even get how people come across scenarios so often where they need this addon.


>>59379602
Why wouldn't I hate a useless piece of shit that does nothing aside from slowing my browser down?

>>59379616
I'm fully convinced now that this is the average DTA user: too retarded to use firefox properly and too retarded to read the thread.

>>59379660
>people come across scenarios so often where they need this addon
Yes, that's me. I need it for daily usage and that's why I'm using this extension. It's to save my time. Especially where there is no better alternatives and there isn't any disadvantages, like extension slowing browser etc., as it's executed only when you starting grabbing links. It's just works for me properly, as it should.

>>59379715
Okay, mind telling me why you use this so often? The only reason I've heard so far was porn. That can't really be the extent of its use, right?

does firefox have oneclick built in?

>>59379715
I'm using it:
-on some servers, which limits upload per socket - with DTA!, I can boost my speed even 10x, per 10 segments, mostly Chinese ones
-on some website pages, which I need to download multimedia files (like only images[JPEG, JPG, PNG, GIF, WebP] + movies [WebM, MKV, MP4, FLV, AVI], etc. combinations), even chans count to this
-on some image sites, which prevents resources behind container pages easily downloadable, mostly image/file sites
-it have build in repeater, so when I'm downloading big files and server or my ISP will get fucked, it will automatically retry from last downloaded part each sec. and times., so this prevent me from downloading again the same parts and whole files
-wasting time, as it speed up the same operations doing manually by more steps with internal downloaders

File: jdownloader[1].png (311KB, 512x512px) Image search: [Google]

311KB, 512x512px

this is all you need

>>59380330
>Java based = blocked by Firefox and Chrome
Obsolete