Question /g/, would this setup work? Can I use 2 repeaters instead

File: wXPwallpaper.jpg (232KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

232KB, 1920x1080px

bump

File: 1472827256624.jpg (680KB, 2560x1600px) Image search: [Google]

680KB, 2560x1600px

where are my network fags?

Put repeater 1 between R1 and repeater 2.

File: 1489014928948.jpg (34KB, 720x694px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 720x694px

>>59356440
That's not how it works you retard
Even if it did you wouldn't see a 2x increase in bandwidth, more like 1.2x

>>59357289
I dont want bandwidth increase, I want stability increase. So let's say a metal wall mysteriously appears behind one repeater, I want the connection to remain because the other repeater STILL has a solid connection.

>>>/g/sqt

>>59357729
Oh, in that case yes. But there would still be an interrupt because the connection would have to switch between one or the other

Why are you using 2 routers?

If this repeater is an AP why not connect directly to it, unless is a fucking hub.

>>59357962
Reason being because repeater loses 50% bandwidth when connecting to it via wifi. If I hook up another router via ethernet cable, then I dont lose speed.