Do you think this is a good entry level gaming pc? Case

>>59333417
Good? Heaven's no. Dual core even with HT is garbage today. It's usable.

>>59333417

not really

>>59333417
Athlon x860k is better.

>>59333476
The g4560 is incredibly good for its price, coupled with the 470 it should do very well.
What's a better combination for such a low price?

Get dual channel memory, don't let anyone tell you it doesn't help(look up fallout 4 benchmarks if you don't believe me), other than that looks good.

>>59333575
I always wondered about the difference between 1x8 and 2x4 but now that i googled it, it seems 2x4 really is a bit faster.
So thanks for the input.

>>59333417
Literally my setup but I used a 460. Like Anon said fix your RAM.

>>59333619
Which case did you get?

>>59333552
Not limiting yourself to such a low price. If you're gonna put yourself in a spot where you have to upgrade soon anyway, might as well upgrade right now to get it over with.
Otherwise you'll end up buying a brand new CPU and board soon.

>>59333417
If your poor as shit then I guess thats fine.
pretty sure it will be weaker than my pc I built in 2012 and haven't upgraded the graphics card for 3 years but I guess it will be cheaper

>>59333645
Cooler Master N200.

I cant say how your PC will perform as a gaming rig, I'm still playing TW:Medieval 2 and Age of Empires 2. But it's comfy and don't let anyone tell you the G4560 is a bad decision. AMD won't beat that price.

>>59333716
On a serious note I play Overwatch 1080p 60fps on Ultra, but that game is easy on requirements so its not saying much. Your 470 is fine for a budget build .

>>59333488
>Athlon x860k is better.

Lol, right http://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/AMD-Athlon-II-X4-860K-vs-Intel-Pentium-G4560/3265vs3892

That is a good entry level gaming pc OP. Cheap as fuck, yet decently powerful with huge upgrade path.

>>59333663
>>59333685
Since it's a popular combo there's many gameplay videos like https://youtu.be/0kjBdWdRo3w and it seems to be performing very well for the cheap as fuck price.
Maybe i should also mention that it's for 1080p and most of the times not even AAA titles like Witcher 3 or Battlefield 1 (where it would perform well nonetheless anyway).

File: cucks, cucks everywhere.png (104KB, 443x399px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 443x399px

>>59333417

wait for the cheap zen chips

Is that the newest Pentium? Get that one

Then the answer is yes

>>59333860
Games like GTAV and BF1 will rape it. Hitman too. I mean if you're fine with the 30 FPS experience, the CPU is okay.

OP its fine just make sure if you stream to set it to VNC encoding so that it doesnt use your cpu since you only have 2 cores.

File: G4560.png (3MB, 3998x2308px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3998x2308px

>>59333476
Nice meme, retard.

>>59333949
You are free to get burned by it.

>>59333920
>Games like GTAV and BF1 will rape it

But that's bullshit. GTA V relies on a small amount of strong cores and you can see here >>59333949 that BF1 never drops below 60fps. Watch Dogs 2 and Hitman are valid examples of games that will choke it, but they're an extreme minority. For 99.9% of games, a G4560 will provide you with a stable 60fps at 1080p.

>>59333982
Oh no, "burned" to the tune of $60 and able to drop an i5 or i7 in to replace it when it's outlived its usefulness. How will I ever recover?

Sorry that nobody wanted your terrible advice, dumbass.

>>59333417
Yes it's fine
>>59333476
is retarded

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dichjs9HXTg

>>59333417
>>59333488
wait for ryzen r3,
stupid fucks.

>>59334014
Could just drop an i5 in there to begin with. Suddenly you saved 60 bucks.

>>59333417
Looks pretty damn good to me

File: let-down.png (609KB, 854x640px) Image search: [Google]

609KB, 854x640px

>>59333891
>>59334034
AMD waitfags are so delusional

>>59334111
The R7 1700 crushes the 7700K in anything makes good use of it's 16 threads

>>59333920
Wrong, they can get 60 fps

>>59334034
g4560 is 60$, quad core ryzen will cost at least twice as much you fucking retard.

File: 1daaga65miang.png (72KB, 601x830px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 601x830px

>>59334124

>>59334160
Games clearly don't make use of it's 16 threads?

and the intel chips are only 10fps faster on average once you get your R7 chip to 4ghz

>>59334160
>Not at 4GHz

>>59334160
Jesus, did you even read his post?

A lot of illiteracy for a hired shill.

File: 1484692700151.jpg (63KB, 498x336px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 498x336px

>>59333663
Look at this cuck

>>59333417
Some Youtube channel did a review of this combination, it was pretty good but don't expect 60FPS in a lot of games at 1080p.

Check on JET.com right now there is a 470 on sale for $115 after coupon and rebate.

File: 210-630.1488454490 (1).png (45KB, 630x424px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 630x424px

>>59333949
>>59333552
>>59333575
>>59333619
>>59333810
>>59333860
>>59333906
>>59334014
>>59334086
>>59334111
>>59334160
>no frametimes
Enjoy your choppy chips

Pic related, and this is with none of the problems of Ryzen solved

>>59333417
>gaming

File: 196-630.1488454549.png (46KB, 630x424px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 630x424px

>>59334900
>not waiting for the superior R3 & R5 chips
DID I FUCKING STUTTER?

File: 197-630.1488454546.png (39KB, 630x424px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 630x424px

>>59334921
SMOOTH AS FUCK

>>59333417
>>>/g/pcbg