[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Hey /g/ents. Are there any other good jewtube channels where

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 12
Thread images: 2

File: thunderf00t.jpg (4KB, 100x100px) Image search: [Google]
thunderf00t.jpg
4KB, 100x100px
Hey /g/ents. Are there any other good jewtube channels where pseudo science gets BTFO?

I'm not interested in SJW bashing, I know thunderf00t does this as well, but I don't care for it. (so please, no faggot of akkad etc) I'm really looking for channels that destroy pseudo science with actual science. Thanks.
>>
File: benshapiro.jpg (15KB, 526x216px) Image search: [Google]
benshapiro.jpg
15KB, 526x216px
>>59332050

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCaeO5vkdj5xOQHp4UmIN6dw
>>
>>59332074
thanks for a good example of pseudo-science
>>
>>59332125

kill yourself
>>
>>59332050
Try asking /sci/. They will probably know more about science-y channels.
>>
>>59332050
Try asking the_donald. They will probably like you more.
>>
Think his name is potholer54
>>
People with enough academic credentials to debunk bad science and faggots with enough free time to run YT channels are disjoint sets. Search for Ben Goldacre talks / videos though. He's mostly interested in evidence-based medicine: BTFO's anti-vaccination fags, homeopathy fags, big pharma's creative approach to clinical trial results and popular media's coverage of medicine ("Eating broccoli prevents asshole cancer!!!1!") and is pretty entertaining.
>>
>>59332151
You're probably right. I will.
>>
>>59332276
>enough academic credentials to debunk bad science
But you don't need academic credentials to debunk bad science. You just need a good understanding of the science behind it.

>Ben Goldacre
This is not exactly what I'm looking for, but could be entertaining nonetheless, thanks.
>>
https://scholar.google.com

And try the >>>/sci/.
>>
>>59332172
He's pretty good.
Thread posts: 12
Thread images: 2


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoin at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Posts and uploaded images are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that website. If you need information about a Poster - contact 4chan. This project is not affiliated in any way with 4chan.