Press F to remember the good times when this was the fastest,

why? It works fine for me. learn how to use about:config

File: 1487586874812.gif (285KB, 400x318px) Image search: [Google]

285KB, 400x318px

>>59324563
Haha you said sjw unironically. Your dumb, very sorry foour you.

>>59324600

It's shit compared to Chromium, Opera and Vivaldi. The whole extension change deal will be the final nail in Mozilla's cofin


>>59324622

lol butthurt SJW detected.

>>59324622
t. redditor trash

It's still better than any Chromium-based browser

File: FB_IMG_1478059822160.jpg (35KB, 514x640px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 514x640px

Palemoons time is now

>>59324622
>Your dumb.
Nice one.

>>59324708

I wish, I switched from FF to Chromium, after seeing the difference it's impossible going back to Firecucks.

>>59324762

Palemoon sucks dick too, fucking thing can't even render video sites without getting laggy. And not all extensions (aka Firefox's main appeal) don't even work on it.

>>59324563
Use SeaMonkey

It is the closest thing to FireFox 3 that isn't too outdated (it isn't bleeding edge) and is not a placebo like PaleMoon.

Fuck the chromenet

>>59324649
speeds are fine for me. it might be a few miliseconds slower than chromium based browsers but its negligable.

>>59324842

I can open hundreds of tabs on Chromium an the browser won't get too laggy and shit itself, unlike FF/Palemoon (which is funny, since Firefox 3 could open 1000 tabs in a 4GB RAM machine and still worked ok).

>>59324783
Firefox extensions are about to die now though

>>59324563
Fuck off Google shill.

>>59324563
[spoiler] F[/spoiler]

>>59324898
>I can open hundreds of tabs
But why? You're not looking at them all at once and there is no reason you need to keep that many open.

FRECENCY
R
E
C
E
N
C
Y

>>59325086
>HURRDURR ONLY CHROME IS BETTER THAN FF

Firecucks is so bad it's making even Edge a viable option.

>>59325138
>being a casualfag that only checks his instagram and reddit on his phone

I fucking hate normies so much.

>>59324929
>>59324649
>extension change deal
I can't find any source for this.

>>59325163
You didnt answer the question. Why do you need hundreds of tabs open at once?

>>59325185

Research, multi-tasking, read-later things, video downloading, (((((porn)))), work references, chatting, news reading, 4chan shitposting across boards, image browsing, shopping, auction watching, music listening.... there's no excuse why a modern browser can't keep so many tabs without going apeshit.

>>59325205
I cant see how that would be over 100 tabs

>>59325254

That's because you're a nomie who only posts duckfaces on instagram, not a power user with lots of things to do.

>>59325205
And you use Chrome for that? LMAO good luck with keeping them organized or God forbid you have to restart your browser.

>>59325275
Nice projecting. I close tabs when I'm done with them or when they arent being used.

>>59325310

Chromium's vanilla tab management fucking sucks compared to FF, but I've found extensions that make it decent. Seriously HOW FUCKING HARD IS IT TO MAKE A FAST BROWSER WITH GOOD TAB MANAGEMENT!???????

>>59325332

Firefox is so shit it would still be laggy after closing tabs and crash eventually, I'm not having that problem with Chromium so far.

>>59325387
>Firefox is so shit it would still be laggy after closing tabs and crash eventually, I'm not having that problem with Chromium so far.
And I dont have that problem with Firefox. I guess use whats best for you, right?

>>59325415

Can't argue with that, all I'm asking is a browser that just werks for tab hoarders. Firefox 3 was the closest thing, it's been downhill since.

>>59325205
I don't know how ff handles 100+ tabs on windows but on linux and osx ff works like a charm. If iridium had treetabs I would try it.
t. vimfag who uses emacs for functional languages

I just use M-x w3m-goto-url

Still using Firefox (portable), now upgraded to Firefox ESR 52, no issues of note, Health Report say the last "crash" was in 2012 and this has been upgraded with each new version since 2011. No memory leaks, no real lag to speak of (no more than any other browser), still gets good scores on Javascript benchmarks versus the competition, 27 addons, 13 user scripts, absolutely no problems whatsoever.

OP, you just have no luck with browsers and software.

Or you're fucking stupid.

>stupid fucking people will be the death of us all

>>59326278

How many open tabs you average?

>>59326328

I have 7 open at the moment, I've had as many as 45 open but I'm not stupid like most people and I don't leave 'em fucking open for hours and sometimes days at a time which is utter insanity but whatever.

Same installation in the same folder (again, portable) since Firefox 3 came out, upgraded through every version till Firefox ESR 28 came out then I switched to using only the ESR builds and that's what's been upgraded ever since.

Regardless, it works for me, it's heavily customized (you couldn't even tell it's Firefox by looking at it and I don't mean because of rounded tabs, I only use the Dev theme so the tabs are squared proper and I use Tab Mix Plus to start a new row after 10 tabs wide.

People having problems with Firefox over the past decade either don't have a fucking clue (the most likely solution) or they have machines and OS installs that are fucked up to begin with.

>>59326474
>I have 7 open at the moment

Well no wonder, ANY browser even shit tier old 2009 Internet Explorer works seamlessly with so few tabs open.

>>59326521
did you read the rest of his post?

>>59326542

See, the problem when dealing with stupid fucking people like that person is that they can't help themselves in rationalizing their own positions whatever they happen to be.

You can't fix stupid, the best you can hope to do is point it out whenever it crosses your path in the hopes of warning others so they'll avoid it and not get sucked down by it.

>stupid fucking people will be the death of us all

>>59326542
>>59326668

Irrelevant drivel, as I said old Firefox in 2008 could handle 1000+ open tabs just fine, new Firefox in 2017 can barely handle more than a couple dozen. What gives?

>>59326954
obvious shitpost is obvious

>>59327008

Not an argument. I'm genuinely interested on what changed.

>>59326954

>1000+ tabs in Firefox in 2008
>that would entail using more RAM than the motherboard was physically capable of
>your page file would expand itself constantly and perform so horribly on the SATA I hard drives and controllers that the machine would literally crawl

If you're going to lie, at least do it well meaning don't blow it so far out of proportion that your comment becomes dismissed as fucking stupidity immediately.

If you'd said maybe 100 tabs that would be believable.

Also, since Mozilla has every fucking build and version of Firefox that's ever been made available even right now on their FTP site why don't you go get Firefox 1.0 (it's only 4MB in size) and install it then let's see you open 1000+ fucking tabs on Vista or XP or even a Linux distro running on a Core Duo or Core 2 Duo machine with 1 or possibly 2GB of system RAM in it and then show us Task Manager or System Monitor or top or whatever you want, then show us a video of the machine actually working and doing other things with 1000+ tabs open.

Until you can do that and it plainly demonstrates the browser working perfectly with no lag or other issues and the system remains snappy and fast you should really just shut the fuck up.

>>59324563
Let's fork it and make it better. It is open source after all

>>59327080
>that would entail using more RAM than the motherboard was physically capable of
>your page file would expand itself constantly and perform so horribly on the SATA I hard drives and controllers that the machine would literally crawl

Back then I had 2GB of RAM and a core 2 Duo CPU. And it did worked, even if was laggy (but not unusable).

>If you're going to lie, at least do it well meaning don't blow it so far out of proportion that your comment becomes dismissed as fucking stupidity immediately.

Not a lie, hell I still have the saved sessions from back then somewhere.

>Also, since Mozilla has every fucking build and version of Firefox that's ever been made available even right now on their FTP site why don't you go get Firefox 1.0 (it's only 4MB in size) and install it then let's see you open 1000+ fucking tabs on Vista or XP or even a Linux distro running on a Core Duo or Core 2 Duo machine with 1 or possibly 2GB of system RAM in it and then show us Task Manager or System Monitor or top or whatever you want, then show us a video of the machine actually working and doing other things with 1000+ tabs open.

No YOU do it if you want to prove me wrong so badly.

File: bHtfiPZ.png (401KB, 1920x1155px) Image search: [Google]

401KB, 1920x1155px

>>59324563
I deeply miss the colorfultabs extension that is not compatibe e10s

File: NO_U.jpg (77KB, 350x248px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 350x248px

>>59327251

>No YOU

You actually said that. amazing.

>>59325438
Vivaldi.

On this note, what is a browser that is both not trash and not botnet?

>>59327296
>deflecting this hard with le ebin le oldfag meme XDDDD

>>59324563
the left is cancer, it eventually kills everything in the most horrible way.

>>59327313
>node.js and a ton of node.js/npm libraries on top of chromium
>explosive_vomitting_guy.png

>>59327251
this is such bullshit, if you try running 1000+ tabs on that hardware today any browser will shit itself. even back then without all the javascript shit it would be unusable.

>>59327426

Or maybe most sites started overloading their pages with too much unnecessary, resource consuming horseshit.

File: pls.png (182KB, 256x286px) Image search: [Google]

182KB, 256x286px

>>59324563
Fuck off, firefox is still great. Google is 10x more sjw than firefox

>>59328763
>implying I use (((((GOOGLE CHROMEEEEEEEE))))

File: babycostume.jpg (29KB, 617x294px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 617x294px

>>59328779
Palememe?

>>59328800

Ungoogled Chromium master race.

File: baconnest.jpg (33KB, 470x481px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 470x481px

>>59328821
You can't ungoogle that shit hahahaha

>>59328841

t. goon kike shill

Using Chromium here

it already has no jewgle API keys so no need to ungoogle it further

File: silly.jpg (86KB, 243x393px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 243x393px

>>59328870
>>59329028
Of course the anti semites love chromium

>>59329028
kek
you obviously havent monitored your network traffic.

>>59329098
you obviously like using browsers made in the last year

>last stable ungoogled-chromium version was in december

wew enjoy your bugs

>>59329108
are you retarded? chromium still contacts google.

>>59329189
prove it

>>59329196
I've monitored my traffic. I can tell you haven't. Use what you want, just don't be mistaken.

>>59324563
What's a good browser? Currently using Waterfox and Palemoon but both are buggy pieces of shit and I don't trust FF or anything Joogle has it's nose in.

File: 1489087472927.png (245KB, 473x410px) Image search: [Google]

245KB, 473x410px

>>59324622
>Your dumb
Obvious bait

File: tmp_17077-1kWs32p2076056099.jpg (2MB, 2085x2399px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2085x2399px

>AḶ̩̖͚̺L̜̥̤̠̩ͅ ̠͇F̰͇̖̯̠̥̜U̱̯ͅC̢͓̜̘̳͙̙K̴͍̼̝͔I̵̩N̟̘͈G̯̺ C̻̥͍̘U̫͖̣N̘T͍̘͎S̫͓̝ ͘A̖̤̬̫R̩̬̜̩̝̫E̻͎͓ ̣̖̼̲L̳̮̖̻̭͕̮I͈KE̵ ̖̰̮͉W̳͚̠̙̫͉E̘͍͍͎̼͉B̘̭ͅ ͖͓̣͠BR̷͕̠̼O͉͍W̩̯S͕̠̳̭̼̭͠E͚̱̯R͠S͖̩͕̺̻̘ ̮T̙̙̗H̵̗̲͙̩̬̥̳E̶Y̩ ̴H̹̰͓̫À̖V̱͕̬̫͔̜̱E̻̭ ̀B̗̦̦͘E̵̫̲̝̬̘̮̥E̗̫͕̘̱̩̥N͉ ̙̫̘͇͢F̣̤͖̦̻̝U̼̱̼̯̺͖C͓͜K̵E͍̬͡D̨̦̜̦͎͇̝ ͇͉̦͖̻S͓E̼͚̪̝̼̯E̜͙̘͓̝ ̡̞͚Y̼͞Ò̳̙͔̩͔̩͚U̷͎̟̻̝̜ͅ ̼͎̦͟ͅC̶̳͍̹͕̞Ǫ̘̙͉̹̪̻C̟̤͔̝̣͉K͔̬̳̼̬͈ ̼̦͚̤S̩̖͖U̵̗̙̘͉̫C͍̥̞̻̣̪̜K̫Į̮̳̫̺̞N̠̣̕G͚ ̧͍͇̗̠͉̻͍C̤U͔̞͖̳̟C̵̗̖̭̣̝̰K͍̫̰͖̩S̼͙̻̭̳̜̙ ͖̳I̲̩͈̯͎̣Ṇ̖̖ͅ ̬̝̘̫̭͖J͖̩EL̴̺̭L̠̝̫̪͙̬͝ͅ ̮͍̳͔A̩̱̭̩R̥RG͔͉̱̹̫̘R̡̬͎̪̗̲̭̘HͅH̞̳̬͇H̠͈̝̩͖̯H͔̙Ḫ̛͔̗̫̠̳͍

File: bVE1fCq.png (3KB, 368x77px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 368x77px

Welp, palemoon is trash. Keeps crashing on me, so I went back to Vivaldi. Than I remember the one thing that fucking bugged me about it. Does anyone know how to remove the recent tab icon? Thing is such a fucking eyesore to me.

>>59329845
This is accurate if the brains represent botnets

>>59329845
But most people (normies) uses Chrome now

>>59325275
>power user
no

you're just all over the place

I don't get the Firefox shitposting in here. Nightly 64b. has been working for me ever since I switched.

>>59329906
>Nightly
>working

Pick one

anyway

go kill yourself for shitting on the last free browser

on a daily basis

>>59329906
its payed shills most likely

you can see it for months now, every day a hate thread

FF becomes unusable on my T400. The lags are exruciating. Chromium is fine otoh. Why is FF so bad? I don't want to use Google.

>>59329946
>its payed shills most likely
That's what I'm thinking, it's kind of hard to believe that there are this many tech illiterates that don't know how to configure a browser on a technology board. But I guess we can't rule it out.

>>59329955
install waterfox

>>59330024
JUst go to any 1800X thread and its people posting nothing but game benchmarks.

it's /v/'s support board

>>59325205
You are assuming that webpages are static objects.

They are programs, anon. Running programs that are constantly updating.

Video downloading, chatting, and music listening in a browser? And you have the audacity to call someone else a normie?

Skid confirmed.

>>59326954
Webdevs running a hundred .js tracker plugins on your machine when you click a link.

>>59329955
nigga i use ff on craptops with 1 or 2 gigs of ram
shit werks

either you did something wrong or refresh it in safe mode or something

i dont have a shit ton of addons tho

"Firefox is mozilla.org's premier Web browser. Firefox is available for Windows, Mac OS X, Linux and many different languages. It's small, fast, easy to use, and has hundreds of themes and extensions available to make the browser even more powerful. Firefox is a quick download, 7.7MB on Windows, about 20 minutes with a dial-up connection, less than a minute with broadband speeds."

>>59325138
Not all in one session. And of course many of them will never be looked at. But merely opening the tabs is enough to placate my autism.

>>59324563
>fastest, most innovative browser
I don't care if it's fast.

Security is more important because your browser is the weakest point. Always.

File: amazon.png (30KB, 643x177px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 643x177px

DAILY REMINDER THAT FIREFOX IS PART OF THE AMAZON CLOUD BOTNET

F ;_;7

Just buy 16GiB of RAM already FF works perfectly for me

----------------------------------------------------
[posted from my Windows 10 system]
----------------------------------------------------

>>59324563
>installs tons of shitty plugins/addons
>complains that the browser gets slow

>>59331720
Underrated post.

On desktop Windows it sucks ass but in Android and Linux it's more like how it used to be back in the golden days I love it on my phone but hate it on desktop especially windows where chrome dominates

You don't like it then?

Is there a way to get chromium to auto notify of updates on windows?

It is the only thing stopping me from switching over on my windows PC. I don't want the chrome botnet either.

>>59324563
Chrome and Edge often have internet problems when I use them
Firefox always is consistent
Sorry man but firefox is the most reliable browser I have used

>>59331669
if you worry about the C1A then maybe you should cut your terrorist ties

>>59329419
>C̤U͔̞͖̳̟C̵̗̖̭̣̝̰K͍̫̰͖̩S̼͙̻̭̳̜̙ ͖̳I̲̩͈̯͎̣Ṇ̖̖ͅ ̬̝̘̫̭͖J͖̩EL̴̺̭L̠̝̫̪͙̬͝ͅ


What did he mean by this?

>>59324649
Opera is pretty cool, except that it's owned by China.

>>59324649
> It's shit compared to Chromium, Chink Chromium, and Hipster JS Chromium

>dying leftist SJW-infested pile of garbage it is today.
Um....wtf? Seriously?
Is everything in the world about identity politics now?
Grow up.

>>59325163
>He thinks I use Chrome or Firefox.
Get a load of this guy.

File: [FFF] Non Non Biyori - 01 [578B3C97].mkv_snapshot_06.51_[2017.03.02_00.57.51].png (387KB, 490x490px) Image search: [Google]

387KB, 490x490px

>daily "firefox is soo shit" thread
>100 replies already

>>59331336
So do you use chrome or FF?

File: 1390004417955.jpg (25KB, 352x288px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 352x288px

I have no fucking idea what Mozilla was expecting if they killed NPAPI. This kills the Java and Acrobat Reader plugins, which must be easily just as popular as Flash.

They've been losing marketshare and they decide to do this? This will only alienate users even more.

now onto the important bit: Which fucking browser do I switch to (I'm on ESR at the moment)

>>59332606
There is no point to have these plugins in browser, they are so 2006.

>>59324563
>normie tier
Firefox
>hacker tier
Firefox nightly
>Bogandov tier
Firefox ESR

I use chrome and firefox

forgive me if I use firefox when I don't want the whole fucking thing to crash and sperg out making my save file interface completely white after opening any more than 15 tabs

forgive me if I use chrome when I don't want to suddenly have 6gb of memory usage from 3 tabs open when something goes wrong

>>59332911
what is the retard/autist tier?

>>59332930
chromium

works on my machine :^]

>>59324563
you can't even change your fucking useragent in chrome
why can't there be a single good browser on this earth

>>59324563
It still is the best on mobile due to uBlock0 support, though.

>>59332973
No plugins that do it? That is messed up

>>59333007
there are
however the useragent exposed to javascript remains unchanged by them

fuck it, im using ESR

stable = ram hogging, hanging POS
nightly = unstable hanging POS
beta = nu-male POS

I like Firefox because of muh freedoms and a proper vim shortcuts support. Chrome always intercepts so I can't use it in PDF, addons page or while tab is loading. Whole point of using vim is missing, because you never know when it'll work.

Although Firefox is really bad compared to what we have in Chrome now. Sync works like shit, javascript/animation heavy websites are really slow - consider wikimapia, for example - or something like inbox.google.com where microlags in Firefox are annoying. Most of the addons will turn off e10s, so you have to be careful picking those.

But I don't really care. It's fine and I'm glad I'm not using the botnet. I'll be waiting couple of years for a shiny new Servo engine written in safe and robust language. Today these issues doesn't give too much of a discomfort.

>>59333308
I guess "really bad" is too harsh there and it is not what I meant. Firefox just noticeable worse, but it's a bearable price for muh freedoms.

>>59333308
Ah, completely forgot - native OS notifications out of the box. Another point for Firefox.

>>59332027
>le epic nothing to hide, nothing to fear maymay

neo-/g/

>>59334205
>CIA is bad KGB is good

Nice try, Vlad.

Firefox? More like Firecucks amirite?

>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=332529#c14
>userChrome.css next on the chopping block
Guess it's time for palememe

>>59334448
Smedberg is known retard for his "I don't use this feature, then users don't need it too" attitude

>>59324762
>using palemoon
>open jewtube
>doesnt render correctly
>lags like fucking crazy
>can only watch videos sometimes
I love palemoon otherwise, but if I can't watch a video in a browser, I'd rather use another browser

File: absolutely marvelous.jpg (278KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

278KB, 800x600px

They're also dropping support for Windows XP soon, fuck these guys.
>>59324762
>FB_IMG_*
Get the FUCK out of here.
>>59325163
>"normies"
You can fuck off, too.

File: anger.jpg (84KB, 692x478px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 692x478px

>>59334654