>admin of this site creates zeronet one
>one peer will be current servers
>other peers are users
>bandwidth costs down
>more saving money
why is this a bad idea?
Yes zeronet is 100% opensource
moreinfo : https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1_2qK1IuOKJ51pgBvllZ9Yu7Au2l551t3XBgyTSvilew/pub?start=false&loop=false&delayms=3000&slide=id.g9a1cce9ee_0_4
Referring to all community sites obiviously, not limited to this one
Oh and it is only 7mb, test it out yourself. I think this is future
>>59316735
*future for community driven sites
TL;DR : Its like torrenting, but a website. Users will not only leeach but also seed.
bumpeno
every couple months I see this shit pop up
I do hope this thing becomes used anon/shill
good luck to you
>pirating websites
>>59316735
CIA will take this down because muh pedos
>>59316932
Actually there are forums. And it works great. (5 posts per day? Not bad.
>>59316935
Its to help the site owner + no central point of attack and sheet. Also no need to depend on that centralized DNS.
But IPFS.
>>59316977
How? It exists at this very moment, there are forums (slow but it works).
Just try it anon, its 7mb, completely open source.
>>59316932
How can I shill for a open source decentralized project haha.
I'll admit, I'm am a huge fan of decentralization (OpenBazaar etc. )
>>59317581
*slow as in number of posters, speed is pretty gud
If it's not in my distro's repositories it can fuck off.
>>59317719
Mate
wget https://github.com/HelloZeroNet/ZeroBundle/raw/master/dist/ZeroBundle-linux64.tar.gz
tar xvpfz ZeroBundle-linux64.tar.gz
cd ZeroBundle
How hard was that?
>>59317747
How hard is it to make a package?
Fuck off.
>>59317579
IPFS is for file storage. Both zeronet and IPFS can (and will? ) coexist.
Is this some chinese marketing scheme?
I'm not very versed in how the internet works, how can sites still be visited if you're not connected to a network?
someone sum up the reasons from last time why it's shit
Mate, try it out , unless you are in India or something why would you worry about a 7mb download.
>>59317793
If it is shit, how am I using it right now?
>>59317791
Read OP linked doc, this is not replacement of network or something
>>59317782
You may check source code on github.
>>59317826
>If it is shit, how am I using it right now?
shit doesn't imply apparent dysfunction
>>59317806
Here's a better idea. Fuck off.
The devs can be package maintainers for their own fucking software or fuck off.
>>59317871
There are simple tools you can use to basically create packages for all distros you cunt. Fuck off.
>>59317934
Alright then. How do I become some stupid package maintainer then? Fuck off.
>>59318152
Nah m8 fuck off.
>>59317747
>wget
>github
>not git clone
wat
>>59316735
i don't think you understand how zeronet works
>>59318348
What was wrong
TorManager Tor controller connect error: IOError: [Errno 13] Permission denied
>literally just did 'sudo usermod -a -G tor username' after confirming the file is owned by 'tor'
Just werks.
>>59318209
Cancer. You cant complain about floss shit if you dont contribute yourself
>>59320459
So you want me to spend my time by posting on my distro's forum on how to package this software which I barely know anything about and to maintain it because otherwise I'm like the women's studies majors who complain about women in STEM?
Ok.
Fuck off, I can complain about anything. There's no criteria for criticism other than the merit of the argument of that criticism.
kys
>>59316977
Wouldn't you be able to remove illegal shit yourself? As in not be a distributer? Or is it all encrypted to the host? Even so, I like the idea. I'd rather have pedos, drugs, etc., plus freedom than constant spying and internet oppression. One bad thing is it'll probably eat through bandwidth and grow uncontrollably over time. Unless you can only "seed" a limited number of sites/resources (to not have over 100GB of data sitting on your drive, growing exponentially), which just brings me to the first question I asked.