Can someone explain how the 1800X beat the 6900K by 10fps in

What are the marks for 7700K at 4K?

File: 1466071430245.png (10KB, 800x401px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 800x401px

>>59305075
http://techbuyersguru.com/intels-core-i5-6600k-vs-i7-6700k-vs-i7-6900k-games?page=3

http://hwbot.org/newsflash/4335_ryzen_platform_affected_by_rtc_bias_w88.110_not_allowed_on_select_benchmarks

http://www.zolkorn.com/reviews/amd-ryzen-7-1800x-vs-intel-core-i7-7700k-mhz-by-mhz-core-by-core/3/

L3 cache problems, BIOS problems, RAM problems, w7 has 20% fps gain.
growing pains. Half of it is Microsoft related.

If it doesn't get better after MS patches scheduler/BIOS updates, then we can say it sucks, not yet.

>>59305122
less. but by 1-2% no more

AMD probably made custom drivers for it, or they asked DICE. They probably picked Battlefield 1 though because it was an outlier on how well it performed.

>>59305075
Go back to /v/laming /v/aggotry please :∆)

Embrace it
https://youtu.be/p8JLBq4xoAw

>>59305075
intel has 25% per from HT
AMD has 30% from SMT when it works
it works in bf1

File: 1488679630588.png (84KB, 653x726px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 653x726px

>>59305075
DELET DIS

>>59305142
Yes there surely must be an alternate explanation

File: 1484353081022.png (402KB, 588x598px) Image search: [Google]

402KB, 588x598px

>>59305123
After the fixes, those benchmarks are ryzen for sure.