Poor Linux security

>EMET
grsecurity (actually PaX would be more accurate since EMET is about memory protection)

>sandboxie
firejail

>>59268757
>https://www.sandboxie.com/
Is it 2007?

>>59268757

For kernel security, use grsecurity, apparmor, selinux
For increased granularity in file permissions, use an ACL
For X11 exploits, use wayland or firejail

>No control flow guard
>No way to control your own threads context
Why would I ever use Linux?

File: cool.gif (2MB, 200x150px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 200x150px

>>59268757
Using the words windows and security in the same sentence.

>>59268817
/thread

Plus there is apparmour and SELinux

>>59268757
I don't get it
What is being compromised in this picture

>>59270693
So you have no understanding of computers and repost what others have said?
Please tell me why you think Windows isn't secure

>>59270747
Are you dumb? It's an overflow to pop calc in Rhythm box

File: screencapture-www-cvedetails-com-top-50-vendor-cvssscore-distribution-php-1456174069877.png (504KB, 1366x1391px) Image search: [Google]

504KB, 1366x1391px

>>59268757
dobgeg

File: smuglook.png (434KB, 599x542px) Image search: [Google]

434KB, 599x542px

>>59270693
>security as a product

>>59270833
That includes anything from Microsoft, that's like saying because there's a random UAF in office that windows is insecure. The majority of those are from edge or i.e. whereas Linux is specifically just their kernel