Does anyone use tox for normal, day-to-day communication? I'm intrigued by the protocol, and I really like the toxic cmd line client. Or is this whole thing dying sooner or later?
Basically just needs a security audit and the ability to set up a server at home to catch messages and sent messages when both parties that aren't online concurrently
>>59264627
p2p is future.
currency - bitcoin
marketplace - openbazaar (wait for 2.0 this year)
>>59264627
I hope some /g/ programmers develop that.
That + tor = awesome.
Yeah, I really hope this gets traction. The the sound quality of my test calls was very good, didn't test video, though.
any reason to use it now over GNU Ring?
Wire.
Beware though. It has a fatal flaw which really triggers some people.
If you share your private key with people, you become compromised.
>>59264709
I'll craft the logo.
>>59265802
No race condidtions in chat.
>>59265850
>memectron
Get out stupid autistic idiots.
>>59265802
First time I hear about Ring. Will have to check it out, thanks!
>>59265856
sounds like that new vulnerability gmail has, apparently if you give someone your password they can access your account.
>>59266470
No they can't. Google lock down the account and asks security questions or sends message to your phone. Then you get an email saying
Anon,
Someone has your password. Your account was logged on at ... ...
>>59266670
Only if you try to log in from a new IP I presume?
>>59266726
When you're logging in from a new computer you get an e-mail.
But if you enabled 2 factor authentication you need to know the authenticator code to log in, too.