But what if they did?
http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/hardware-canucks-reviews/74814-amd-ryzen-7-1800x-performance-review-7.html
>>59263706
what does it matter?
>>59263706
isnt that shit hacked now?
>>59263797
Assuming you can spend 6500 CPU years 110 GPU years coming up with another collision, yes.
But you know how the real world is, that isn't going to get replaced by SHA-256 overnight or probably within the next half a decade even.
http://hackaday.com/2017/02/23/shattered-sha-1-is-broken/
>SHAttered — SHA-1 is broken in
>>59263706
>interlaced PNG
are you serious?
>>59263706
shaaa....
>>59263904
>not using SHA-256
>>59263706
Aren't a bunch of cryptocurrency mining stuffs sha?
>>59263913
noob here. how can one tell it's interlaced?
>>59263964
yup
>>59263776
it's not sha1 or sha256 performance exactly it's "hashing overall performance"
>>59264019
Are you sure about that?
>This benchmark measures CPU performance using the SHA1 hashing algorithm defined in the Federal Information Processing Standards Publication 180-3. The code behind this benchmark method is written in Assembly. More importantly, it uses MMX, MMX+/SSE, SSE2, SSSE3, AVX instruction sets, allowing for increased performance on supporting processors.
>>59263964
no your thinking differently
>>59263822
Or you can get a RYZEN and Brute Force it in a hour. Heh
>>59263706
oy vey
>>59263995
im a certified autist
>>59263995
When it's loading like pic related.
>>59264142
It loaded instantly on mouse over for me.
>>59264185
that's because your browser preloaded the png.
>>59264218
Why would i preload that one but I can have a thread open for 20 minutes and still have the 3MB pictures lower down take forever to load?
It's a 442KB file, m8. Your internet is Australian tier.
>>59263964
Just a few but they use SHA256