The Cycle of /g/

>>59254290
1 rolling sticky containment thread
one month ban for anyone not being able to keep the shit in that.

>>59254327
How tf would we get a mod to listen to us?

ryzen is bulldozer 2.0
oligopoly market confirmed

That's the AMD cycle.
For Intel:
They announce new CPU
Nobody cares
Minimal performance boosts
Nobody cares
Intel counts all their money

>>59254372
you don't
>inb4 they ban me.

File: pic_meme_winblows.jpg (24KB, 505x405px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 505x405px

>>59254290
By removing /v/ cross-boarders. But then again, neo-/g/ might be the ones shilling; who knows what would happen then?

>>59254833
This. So. Much.
Hopefully after Ryzen they actually try to make Ryzen BTFO.

>>59254884
why would /g/ shill graphic cards, we don't have autism, we don't need gtx 1080ti for coding or web browsing, we don't need latest i7 to get 3 more fraps per second, the only way to save /g/ is banning /v/ and that's impossible

>>59255064
There are dozens, perhaps even tens of thousands of users here who all have top of the line $2000 home built battlestations and only use them to shitpost here.

There's big money in shilling here make no mistake, especially for graphics cards and cpus.

>>59254290
>How do we stop the cycle /g/?- 9 posts and 1 image reply shown.
ban consumer product threads