ITT: The best processors ever made.

Q6600
Still perfectly fine even for light gaymen

>>59253448
Thats not a Z80...

>>59253448
NOW IS TIME TO THE 68000 HEART ON FIRE!

File: trashman6.png (591KB, 778x1018px) Image search: [Google]

591KB, 778x1018px

>>59253534
Have you lost your way to the amd shill thread?

i7-3770K

File: KL_MOS_6510.jpg (74KB, 1389x481px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 1389x481px

The Big Kahuna.

athlon 64

File: threadshit.png (490KB, 1280x709px) Image search: [Google]

490KB, 1280x709px

>>59253448
>>59253508
>>59253577
>you will never be the main programmer in a top demogroup during the late 80s demoscene.

>>59253667
This

>>59253694
AMIIGAAAAAA ROOOLEZZZZ BUEEEEEeee

and thank goat for that

File: 3570k-2-300x292.jpg (21KB, 300x292px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 300x292px

Underrated

>>59253814
What is that?

>>59253857
Intel 5775C

>>59254823
Thanks Kikes and company, for blowing up the original.

>>59254823
A E S T H E T I C

>>59253767
Ivy will live forever.

I would like to add the locked i5s to that. $70 can get you a four cores at 4.0 ghz.

File: Zilog_Z-80_Microprocessor_ad_May_1976.jpg (840KB, 2460x1632px) Image search: [Google]

840KB, 2460x1632px

Zilog

>>59255497
Itanium?

>>59255709
>PA-8000
puked

>>59253814
Which one is the cpu and which is gpu?

File: 1200px-KL_Intel_Itanium2.jpg (111KB, 1200x703px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 1200x703px

>>59255709
similar packaging
>>59255735
kys

File: cpu800.jpg (18KB, 326x324px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 326x324px

>no thunderbird
step it up

File: IBM_390-G6.jpg (835KB, 2048x2048px) Image search: [Google]

835KB, 2048x2048px

this thread is gay as fuck so I'm just going to dump nice die shots if they're small enough at least

>>59253413

i7 920

File: AMD_80486DX2_die.jpg (3MB, 3274x3079px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3274x3079px

>>59257399
note the massive difference in design between the Intel and AMD versions of the 486DX2

some day I'll set up a bench box and see how they compare, wonder if the Intel designs were better at FP like I'd expect

File: Am386DX-40.jpg (390KB, 1182x957px) Image search: [Google]

390KB, 1182x957px

>>59253413

Grandpa here.

This one changed everything forever. Not the best one by far but the most influential.

File: Cyrix_Cx486DX2-V66_die.jpg (3MB, 3166x3143px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3166x3143px

>>59257435
cyrix version
>>59257448
yeah it certainly wasn't a speed king but a pretty fucking good chip at a reasonable price for typical integer-heavy jobs

File: IBM26BL486DX2-50GP_Blue_Lightning.jpg (131KB, 575x562px) Image search: [Google]

131KB, 575x562px

Cool looking one

File: 1476098325553.jpg (44KB, 620x612px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 620x612px

>>59253413

File: AMD_80486DX4_die.jpg (3MB, 3102x2943px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3102x2943px

>>59257435
DX4 looks pretty much the same
>>59257486
these ones apparently are just rebranded cyrix 486es but the earlier blue lightnings were fucking fascinating, a shitty 386SX turned fully 32-bit and clock-tripled

File: CELL_BE_processor_PS3_board.jpg (191KB, 1200x675px) Image search: [Google]

191KB, 1200x675px

For some reason this thing has always felt special and mysterious.

File: IBM_BlueGeneL_2.jpg (1MB, 1019x1024px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1019x1024px

>>59257602
it's a pretty unorthodox design in many ways

File: RISC2.jpg (1MB, 2160x1226px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2160x1226px

>>59257572

File: IBM_Power7.jpg (515KB, 3345x2676px) Image search: [Google]

515KB, 3345x2676px

everything else I have is >4MB
blog concludes

>>59257602
The design is weird in a cool way but holy shit coding for it was a gigantic pain in the ass.

File: DSCN2413-2.jpg (1MB, 4608x3456px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 4608x3456px

Have this thing encased in epoxy on my desk. Can anyone identify what could that be? It's made by AMS - Austria Mikro Systeme. Doesn't look like CPU dye?

File: IMG_20170306_000352-2.jpg (292KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

292KB, 1920x1080px

>>59257809

>>59253440
Replaced mine a while back with an i5-3570k
>>59253767 (nice) but still use the q6600 in the bedroom for movies and some games.

>>59253486
My first good pc, thing was so overclockable

>anything x86
>best ever

i5 4690
Fight me

>>59258020
Qualcomm please.

>>59258047
what is up with slavs putting rug son walls?

>>59258084
Heat retention

>>59258128
Slav here. That, and sound proofing. In commie blocks you can hear someone queef two floors up from you.

>>59258084
>>59258128
it also dampens sound. can be great if your room is "echoey" or if you have thin shared walls with neighbors

>>59258020
You're either a phonetard or another poser who fancies himself hot shit because he wiki-skimmed the RISC golden age and sucked up all of the marketing bullet points but none of the context. Either way you're retarded. Many of the "best" CPUs would certainly be those that had proven themselves practically as well as theoretically and ideologically.

File: $199 4770K.gif (72KB, 652x137px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 652x137px

>>59253413

pic related.

4770K beats $500 1800X in most gaming benchmarks. Best CPU.

>>59258264
>AMD vs. Intel gaymer shit shilling is leaking out of containment again
Yawn. Fuck off.

File: 100-Core-2-Quad-Q6600-SLACR-Processador-2-4-GHz-8-MB-1066-MHz-Socket-775.jpg (117KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 1000x1000px

>>59253413

>>59253413
Still using it, 5 yrs later and no need to upgrade yet.

File: amd3.jpg (66KB, 568x612px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 568x612px

>>59258284

Are you ok, M-A-Dshill?

File: Core-i5-6600k-1-600x571.jpg (55KB, 600x571px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 600x571px

>>59253413
Upgraded from a i3 540 to pic related. No regerts

>>59255327
>ivy
>start of the shitty thermal paste forced delidding generation

no.

>>59258330
Yeah, unlike your braindead ass I'm capable of independent thought and discussing technology beyond regurgitating numbers, acronyms and appeals to consumerism to further a feeble-minded "us vs. them" narrative and suck corporate cock.

And I'm a pretty consistent user of Intel chips thanks to an OEM hardware fetish. Now fuck off and take your shitty repurposed /pol/jak with you.

>>59257448
>>59254788
>>59257276
Hell yeah, my dudes.

>>59253413
I have one, but I don't know what makes it so good.

>>59253577

LEWD

File: 4.7 ghz.png (93KB, 1383x568px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 1383x568px

>>59253767
can confirm

File: Intel_Core_i5_750_1.jpg (268KB, 1099x1099px) Image search: [Google]

268KB, 1099x1099px

>>59257526
Still using one, it performs well. I wouldn't say there's anything too impressive about it though. Just another CPU from "5% each generation" Intel. Had pic related before the 4790K, OCing from 2.66 to 4.0GHz with perfect stability for years was way more impressive. It could even do ~4.3GHz if I pushed the voltage far enough, but I didn't see any point for that for daily use. Was a great CPU, it's still pulling office duty even now.

>>59258896
>31 idle

I'm impressed anon.

>>59253577
Is that a graphical glitch?

>>59258896
Did you delid?

File: wm Packages.jpg (243KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

243KB, 1280x720px

It's full of plebs here...

https://ark.intel.com/products/95830/Intel-Xeon-Phi-Processor-7290-16GB-1_50-GHz-72-core

>>59253413
I just picked up a cheap i5 3300, and I mean CHEAP, I was in the market for a 3570k as I'm on a budget and spent the past four months or so waiting for the Ryzen... bombshell.

How comparable is the 3300 to the 3570k? I don't have a motherboard that supports straightforward overclocking but I suppose they're cheap enough nowadays if increasing it's clocks will improve it's usefulness.

>>59259877
>>59259909
nope I just got a good chip from a buddy who works at intel Ireland

>>59253413
I was upset after I bought an i5-6500 and then realised I could have bought a better motherboard and 2500k for around the same price

>>59260555
What your max temp during 100% load, also did you just up the clock and vcore, or did you change anything else?

>>59253656
>No AVX
Almost.

>>59254788
X2 250 here, still good.

>>59257602
Really powerful and amazing CPU.
The problem was code for it.

>>59253440
Love the Q, still run mine in my old PC. OC'd it to 3.1 GHz (from 2.4) 60 degrees max with the ENORMOUS tuniq tower cooler

>>59260658

If you care about AVX you should not get a Dual-core Pentium anyway.

File: 2600k.jpg (702KB, 2262x1929px) Image search: [Google]

702KB, 2262x1929px

>>59253413

File: IMG_20170214_201212.jpg (522KB, 1137x853px) Image search: [Google]

522KB, 1137x853px

>>59260962

File: Intel Pentium Pro 180 - haut.jpg (108KB, 700x560px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 700x560px

>ctrl+f
>no Pentium Pro

File: how-being-bilingual-makes-your-brain1.jpg (154KB, 662x381px) Image search: [Google]

154KB, 662x381px

/thread

>>59261052
>consistently harvested for the gold in its pins

scavengers were a mistake

>>59253440
u a boipucci

>>59254788
5600 here

>>59253767
Wtf how did you get yours to to 4.7 at 1.232, Mine is running at 4.4 using 1.27.

File: Histoire_Pentium_Pro_cpu.jpg (45KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 640x480px

>>59261052
I was going to post it but I forgot

The 386 was more fundamentally influential anyway.

>>59258784
My man. At least some faggots here still know when a bunch of important steps happened.

>>59260962
literally the last CPU ever needed to purchase. everything since has been mediocre upgrades to this.

>>59253767
that's what ive been rocking for years now

>>59261200
I5-4690K and I7-4770K were really good though.

>>59255790
GPU is the bigger one

>>59261470
sure, BUT that was when intel started fucking with the cooling and therefore the oc pottential. my i7 2600k has been running at 4.8ghz oc always on with mixed gaming/encoding/streaming since 2011 and don't have any issues still.

>>59257526
mein negger

>>59261470
Devil's Canyon > Kaby Lake/Skylake for sure.

>>59261153
The A64 was the only important step in there, what are you talking about?

>>59258284
Tell me, who the fuck is buying high end non server chips and not using them for gaming?

Gaming is *the* audience for the high end non server market. I'm sorry if that triggers you, but you don't need a top of the line CPU to run word now.

>>59262352
I don't give a shit, I just want you to fuck off to your containment threads with your fucking shilling nobody cares about.

>>59262352
why are you even in this thread then?

>>59262382
@ >>59262365

this is clearly the "containment thread".

>>59262385
Not really, get the fuck out and go back to >>>/v/

People are posting their recent Intel shit as if it has any relevance.. Post some K7 or even the E8400