5820K 2.0 General

>>59253182
>new socket

cucked lol

>>59253184
If you have a 2011v3 CPU you don't need an upgrade.

>>59253182
>wait until august
>wait 6 months goy
nah

>>59253275
Q2 what I hurd

>>59253275
>I can't wait 3 months because I Have To Work With My PC Now (TM)

STOP BUYING SKYLAKE-X AND WAIT FOR ZEN+

>>59253320
>3 months
>not 6 months
>trying to jew me on time
nice try shekelstein

>>59253182
>not waiting for 10nm

>>59253328
STOP BUYING SILICON CHIPS AND WAIT FOR GRAPHENE

>>59253353
>not skipping past 10nm and going to 7nm

>>59253330
30 May 2017

>>59253359
graphene proved to be shit for chips on practice

>>59253353
Who cares

File: 1483587203666.png (17KB, 328x215px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 328x215px

>>59253182
15% performance improvements! ************

************ - In select Intel biased benchmarks under very specific workload conditions that will never happen outside of our testbench

>>59253422
>he upgrades more than once a decade
LaughingGirls.png

File: 1492253291373.gif (590KB, 214x199px) Image search: [Google]

590KB, 214x199px

>paying 500$+ for a stagnant architecture with max 2-4% improved ipc

>not waiting for quantum computers

>>59253428
Don't care.

Cinebench is life.

>>59253182
>P-p-please don't buy AMD
>Just Wait™

>>59253437
Actually I don't

>>59253252
>2011v3 CPU
Lol.
https://www.guru3d.com/news-story/skylake-x-will-be-launched-at-gamescom-2017.html

>According to DigiTimes these puppies will get launched in Q3 2017, lining up with gamescom. The CPUs will require you to AGAIN purchase a new motherboard as they will AGAIN use a new socket, LGA2066 . The platform has support for DDR4 memory and reportedly would be called X299.

>>59253469
WHY THE FUCK WOULD I CARE? BUY THE BEST CHIP YOU CAN AFFORD

>>59253500
Are you retarded? Read what I wrote.

>>59253528
I did mate. Just laughing at the no upgrade path of the poor fuckers.

>>59253442
So? What if I have a 10 years+ old PC?

>>59253359
>STOP BUYING SILICON CHIPS AND WAIT FOR GRAPHENE

They are going to use indium gallium arsenide, not graphene..

>>59253555
>If you have a 2011v3 CPU you DON'T need an upgrade.

>>59253581
Technically if you use a 3570k or 3770k minimum, you still don't need to update either.

>>59253581
>i-it's not like i want y-you to upgrade!

>>59253581
You do though. Ryzen has proven that you can have that kind of performance without putting a 140W housefire in your case.

>>59253182
94% of all /g/ users won't even get close to needing anything more than a 2500k, productivity wise. Waste of money.

File: 1488664232472.png (84KB, 653x726px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 653x726px

>>59253182
o-ok i-ill wait

>>59253600
Yeah, pretty much.

>>59253606
(You)

>>59253609
>Average temperature at 4GHz: 75°

>>59253600
>you need or don't need to upgrade because /g/ said so
You are all fucking retarded. If a CPU does what it's supposed to do then there is NO REASON whatsoever to """""upgrade""""" and give money to some dirty kikes.
i5-2500k is still overkill for 90% of home users

>>59253557
Then you clearly don't need anything more than a 5 year old setup. Something like, say, a 2500k

>>59253671
Yeah, because who buy 200+$ CPU actually need it.

>>59253636
>tfw got a 2600k and never overclocked
I do the odd video encoding. I have no reason to upgrade until it dies

>>59253660
>If a CPU does what it's supposed to do then there is NO REASON whatsoever to """""upgrade""""" and give money to some dirty kikes.

That's exactly what I said.
And the only reason 3570k > 2500k is because it supports SATA3 and PCIE3.

>>59253574
>STOP BUYING FOR INDIUM GALLIUM ARSENIDE AND WAIT FOR THINKPADIUM GENTOOSIDE

the opportunity cost of *just* *wait* never seems to be measured on this board

>>59253182
>STOP BUYING RYZEN
I can smell the desperation

>STOP BUYING RYZEN

No one started.

>>59253720
2500k also supports sata3 you dumb nigger
>pcie3
for what purpose?
Even 1080 doesn't utilize 50% of pcie3.0x16 interface due to bandwidth compression

>>59253754
Nah. Actually I prefer AMD over Intel, but I was expecting more from these chips.

>>59253757
>for what purpose? Even 1080 doesn't utilize 50% of pcie3.0x16 interface due to bandwidth compression

PCIE SSDs.

>>59253726
Kek

>>59253182
JUST YOU WAIT GOY

WE HAVE MORE BACKDOORS ON OUR $1000 PROCESSORS GOY

OY VEY SUPPORT ISRAEL

>>59253182
>PLEASE BUY CPUS MADE BY MY EMPLOYER
>PLEASE /g/ BUY THEIR PRODUCTS
>OH GOD DON'T LET THEM FIRE ME BAWWWW

>>59253574
They are going to use SiGe though.

>>59253820
>2017
>thinking you can be free from any kind of botnet

Son, we have to talk.

>>59253308
they moved it

>>59253800
For what purpose do you need pcie ssd?
Of course I'm talking about valid reasons, not the fact you're a good goy and you care so much about benchmarks

>>59253834
Nah, who the fuck cares. Actually, I hate Intel policy.

>>59253375
delayed

>just bought a 7600k
>this happens
well okay fuck me then. I mean at least itll be fine for at least 5 years.

>>59253891
Source?

>>59253917
Fuck these Jews. Do you have any source?

>>59253894
>For what purpose do you need pcie ssd?

2 gbyte / sec storage speeds.

>>59253928
>>just bought a 7600k
to be fair, you were fucked more ways than one by buying the 7600k over the 7700k.

>>59253928
>5 years with a 4c/4t CPU
Yeah, if that's what you want...

>>59253182
THIS IS WHAT IVE BEEN SAYING. If youre not gonna wait for it, at least wait for Ryzen 5 CPUs

>>59254023
Why? How are these CPU related? Ryzen 5 is supposed to cover a completely different market section.

>>59253963
what do you NEED it for?
Seriously anon, can't you read?

>>59254077
Why would someone need a faster storage?

>>59254077
Faster loading of... pretty much everything one can do on a computer?

I bet you are one of those morons who thinks SSDs are a meme and IDE HDDs are still the best choice due to rotational velocidensity.

>>59254087
>faster storage
exactly?
Beyond the point of usability it becomes a useless meme in typical consumer use.

>>59253182
> Not waiting for Tigerlake

>>59254171
>Not waiting for an Enthusiast (TM) CPU

>>59254123
>I bet you are one of those morons
No, I'm not. I'm using SATA SSDs in all my computers.
>Faster loading
Is it really noticable in typical use and even gayming? NO.
And if you care about difference between 2GB/s loading vs 550MB/s loading of some gaym you should seek immediate psychiatric help
You fucktards will justify buying anything just because MUH NUMBERS.

>>59254171
>not waiting for Intel's unannounced new arch

>>59254194
>4x isn't noticeable

>>59253182
|
|>
|3
|

>>59254235
whats this

>>59254219
No it's not.
Loading pretty much anything from 550MB/s read SSDs is already a matter of seconds. meme pcie storage doesn't make ANY difference in real life scenario.
kys

>>59254256
semitic nose and two hands together

>>59254256
ascii-jew-behind-post.doofus

>>59254257
> s e c o n d s
Laughing at (You)

>>59253184
every single new generation of any chip has a new socket

>>59254194
>Is it really noticable in typical use and even gayming? NO.

skipping back/forward does not lag as much in HD and UHD videos if you run them from faster storage, since they are primarily bottlenecked by drive speeds.

I can ctrl+f for anything in my 10+gb local email archives and get results as I type.

Video editing is way faster. Any kind of editing that deals with large files is significantly faster.

Games load so fast that you barely see loading screens anymore.

It's a luxury, yes, but so is any video card above $300 or water cooling or 4k monitors.

>>59254257
>Loading pretty much anything from 550MB/s read SSDs is already a matter of seconds

And loading something from a revodrive takes a split second.

>>59253854
for real. also, I have tinfoil hat theories about AES-NI.

>>59254311
>It's a luxury, yes
but from the beginning we are talking about typical /g/ use, which is light gaymening, shitposting, watching movies and occasional playing with vms. And in these appliances newest CPU/PCIe storage/muh 1488MHz RAM doesn't fucking matter.
If you care about luxury you wouldn't want i5-2500k anyway, because you don't give a shit about valuing money.

File: 960 EVO.png (36KB, 409x373px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 409x373px

>>59254219

Guy with a 960 EVO here, it's really not a noticeable difference in normal use.
I see a clear difference when handling Photoshop files and transferring data, it's great for things like that.
But compared to my 840 and 850 evos, it's really nothing special in normal use, like gaming or opening things.
If you have the money, sure go for it, but the average user won't notice the difference.

Can't wait for the day that our external storage reaches speeds like this though.
HDDs can't fuck off fast enough.

>>59254358
You missed the point of this topic basically at the beginning.
kill yourself

>>59254418
I have an SM961 and it has nothing to do with my old 750 PRO.

>>59254399
>light gaymening, shitposting, watching movies and occasional playing with vms

All of those benefit from faster storage. Basically you can load AAA games of today as if they were casual games from 2003.

And photoshop loads like fucking mspaint does.

>>59254475
again, you stupid fucking retard, we are talking about most affordable hardware. PCIe storage is an unnecessary cost.

>>59253184
it's not like you will change intel cpu in next 4-5 years

>>59253928
>>just bought a 7600k
Same. No regrets tho, I was on budget and it was the best cpu I could get.

>>59253182
nah i will buy i7 7700k by the end of this month

actually i ordered one but i doubt they will send it since i couldn't even pay after ordering it and when i called them they said shit like we confirmed your order but we need to see if we can ship more to our shop. Fucking komputronik pleb shop.

>>59253636

I haven't bought a new CPU since I built my current rig in 2011. Haven't needed to. I still haven't OC'd my i5 2500k yet, if I run up against a wall, I'll OC it and still not need a new cpu for another 5+ years.

>>59254739
Still have my 2500k from way back, works like a charm, only upped my graphics card past 5 years or so

>>59253955
>>59253929
it was in the news, just google it

>>59253182
I'm gonna get snowy owl with 16c/32t and ECC and all them cpu extensions

1-5% slower with 1080p games? I'm not a manchild. 50% cheaper than intel's offerings? Don't mind that thank you. Lower tdp and power usage you say? That's nice.

But let me just say: fuck your annual socket change. I have 1150, 1151, 2011 and 1366 cpus now in use and god fucking damnit I'm fed up with this shit. If ayymd offers even close enough shit I'll try them.

File: 1487031590020.png (290KB, 579x713px) Image search: [Google]

290KB, 579x713px

>>59253182
>wait for another skylake
kek

>>59253660
Sure, windows xp is suffucient, but is it as good as windows 7? No. Sure, a single core processor is good, but is it fast? Probably not. Is an old hhd sufficient? Sure, but newer ones are better.

>>59253699
>>tfw got a 2600k and never overclocked
You are undoubtedly a moron.

>>59254805
Could you please kill yourself?

File: laughing Dalian.webm (63KB, 240x135px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 240x135px

>>59253726
>THINKPADIUM GENTOOSIDE

>>59254849
>People like yourself think Kaby-Lake is worth the small margin of peformance for $$$$'s more.

>>59254418
>HDDs can't fuck off fast enough.
This, please. I really want the flash $/GB to overcome HDDs. Also, Z-NAND and memetane fucking when? The latter is extremely late and is apparently with problems.

>>59254903
Memetane already looks like another Intel's R&D failure. They promised NAND killer and yet its nothing fucking special (except 3Dxpoint is a housefire).

>>59254894
No. Kaby Lake sucks. So does Broadwell-E. They're just a rebrand of Skylake and Haswell-E, but at the moment, this is the best 8-core desktop architecture, so I hope in something great like the 5820K was.

>>59253182
Like clockwork

>>59254820
You're dumb as fuck.

File: 1475450193106.jpg (122KB, 628x788px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 628x788px

>Tfw bought a 5820k few months ago and I'm most likely good for the next 10 years with this.

Waiting for any new CPUs at this point is retarded. You won't be seeing any radical improvements as long as we're stuck with Silicon.
Now Ryzen has brought AMD to a level where it too is "good enough" makes no damn difference which one you get.
Just go for something with 6 cores minimum and put CPUs out of your mind for the next decade.

>>59254960
Well, you made the best buy you could have done.

>>59254960
Basically this. Just get some 6+cores at decent clocks and forget about CPU up until 7nm nodes are mainstream.

>>59255003
Why the fuck do you care so much about 7nm?

>>59253182
Why not both?

>>59254960
>2113mhz ddr4 ram is max

in trash it fucking goes

>>59255016
Huge uplift in density and more energy efficiency.

>>59255018
Cuz im poor

>>59255031
5820K>6800K

>>59255060
Nuuh my cockspeed

>>59255060
Value-wise? Yes. Other than that they are basically the same CPU, just on different nodes.

>>59255077
Nu becus >>59255075

>>59255075
>cockspeed
Lmao

>>59255075
>>59255093
Delid Lake is that way, anon.

>>59255020
Embarrasing post

>>59255108
Delet this

>>59254960
only if mobo wouldn't cost fucking $250-300 in EUfagland

how does this cpu even oc?

>>59255132
Go over 0.1GHz and enjoy your crashes.

>>59255131
>not delid this

ONE JOB

>>59255202
KEK

>>59255151
still better than Ryzen

>>59255250
I was talking about Ryzen. The 5820K was a beast in overclock.

>>59255250
Ryzen is on low power process though.

File: cpubench.png (18KB, 416x415px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 416x415px

>>59255132

Yeah the prices suck, I paid 300€ for my mobo I think.
I have my 5820k at a small OC of 4.2Ghz 1.198v at the moment, haven't even bothered to go further up or mess with the voltage to see how low I could get it.
I see people running this thing at 4.5Ghz no problems though, so it does OC pretty well.

File: kok_2[1].jpg (81KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 600x450px

>buying processors instead of ascending to a higher plane of existence

>>59255333
>Six cores at 4.2GHz at 1.198v
That's impressive anon. This processor is awesome.

File: 1485525874623.jpg (345KB, 1528x1455px) Image search: [Google]

345KB, 1528x1455px

>>59253182

Why wouldn't you get cost-effective Ryzen?

>waitfagging

Just buy Ryzen and a matured backdoored memelake Xeon

Planning on getting a non-K processor, the i5-7600, since I never plan to OC and that way I can also buy a cheap mobo to go with it.

How long will it last me? Is it a bad idea?

>>59255369
No. I need higher single core performance.

>>59255370
4/4 is pretty bad choice in current year. Like, really really bad choice.

>>59255370
Not a bad idea, but get the 7700, if you can.

>>59255399
>4/4 is pretty bad choice in current year
Depends on the use case and how long the user intends to keep their CPU around for.

>>59255432
He asked how much will it last.

File: 1159383453517.jpg (15KB, 270x226px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 270x226px

No thanks.
I'll stick with my i5-4670K until Graphene happens one day in a decade or two, or until a CPU series comes out which has 100% performance increase over my 4670K to justify upgrading.
CPU's are irrelevant anyhow. GPU's are the
one important hardware to upgrade instead.

File: 1457530766864.jpg (137KB, 773x739px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 773x739px

>>59255370

You can always get a 7700K and auto overclock in the UEFI which is the better solution in the long run.

7700K & Asus Z270A

>>59255388

in b4 $3k price tags

>>59255399
I'll need to buy something soon though, the computer I'm typing with at the moment can't do anything and it's been years I've been like this, I'm tired of it. Finally got a job and money so I need something relatively soon.

Could you expand on why do you think it's a bad idea? I don't do much video editing or really intensive shits. I do gaym but I'm mostly a retro or emulation person, I don't care if in a few years I can't run my games in full ultra or whatever anymore.

>>59255412
It's 100 more € and I can't see it serve me any better than the i5-7600 to be honest. If I had 100€ to throw in a processor+mobo then I'd simply go with the 7600k I think.

Could you explain your reasoning?

>>59255462
>I do gaym but I'm mostly a retro or emulation person, I don't care if in a few years I can't run my games in full ultra or whatever anymore.
Ah, then it's totally okay to get 7600. It will age very poorly in AAA games though.

>>59255460
>3k
More like <1000€

>>59255462

You could also get 7700K and disable hyperthreading, you'll always get a better chip that will age better in time, it's good to have. The market for high end i7s shifted on another socket

>>59255462
>I don't do much video editing or really intensive shits.
>I don't care if in a few years I can't run my games in full ultra or whatever anymore.
Then you don't need an i7.
Unless you hope to do VR. Then you should spring the extra cash for an i7.

>>59255462
If it's 100€ more, get the 7600.

>>59255460
>>59255524
7700k costs 410€ here for me, it's insane.

>>59255486
>>59255525
I'm not sure about VR. Wouldn't it be doable with a high end i5?

Cheers for the answers by the way. When are Ryzen 5 processors coming out? Any estimations?

>>59255585
>When are Ryzen 5 processors coming out? Any estimations?
Supposedly Q2 2017 alongside Naples. If they fix most of the bugs, then it's a nobrainer buy, otherwise stick to i5.

>>59255585

Those import taxes are tough. 7600K, kaby is quite good for 4K playback essentially and that will just grow even if you don't have an immediate usage for it. Otherwise you could also get a 6700K in the last resort. You'd expect some lakes to be on sale since Ryzen launched, keep looking imo

>>59255660
He can also snatch a cheapo Haswell/Devil's Canyon somewhere.

>>59255585
>Couldn't it be doable with a high end i5?
You could do it. But nobody really knows what direction that market is going, or what the requirements will be in the future. And with VR, you really don't want poor performance, since it makes people sick, literally. You want the extra headroom.

But hey, VR is still kinda niche, expensive, and wonky. And DX12 will take some load off the CPU in the future, presumably.
Me telling you to go for an i7 is if you have the cash to spare and you're dead set on VR and great performance. If not, the i5 won't kill you.

>>59255333
Yea I've gotten mine stable at 4.7GHz.

5820k for $280 was GOAT.

Intel is the official processor of nu-males.

>>59255585

If Ryzen 5 turns out at a similar price to 7600K or 7700K just get Intel instead unless you know what you're doing, Ryzen is aimed at more specific usages right now.

Just saying because the RX 480 turned out to be priced very high in your region

>>59255693

Exactly, check the second hand market you'll have haswell offered. Devil's Canyon 4790K has one of the best if not the best single-threaded perf, running that right now. Just make sure you're on Z97 for NVMe on the long run

>>59253182
I don't subscribe to Netflix, why would I want a processor built exclusively for watching their reruns?

I'll be getting Zen.

>>59255759
Intel's HEDT line has no shitty iGPU so no 4k Goyflix for you.

>>59255759
>
what

>>59255020
You're actually retarded

I run my RAM at 3200MHz. The 2133MHz is the only official supported speed. That just means running faster RAM counts as overclocking. Which means you just need to check the motherboard supported RAM speeds. (Generally 3000-3200+mhz)

>>59255530
>>59255605
>>59255660
>>59255693
>>59255706
Yeah VR isn't one of my priorities, I'll see about that next time I upgrade or buy a computer in 4-5 years or something.

I'll keep waiting and looking for a bit.

>>59255743
I'm not even sure I'd get Ryzen anyway, I'm mostly curious about their 5s and how it'll affect intel prices. Of course if it's objectively better than I'll get Ryzen. As for R7 they aren't for me, like you said.

>>59255714

That's very impressive.
One day when I have time to mess with the stability tests, I should try to see how far I can push the clocks myself.

>>59255851
Yea, just try to keep it under 1.35v & ~80-85c and you should be fine.

>>59255791

not the iGPU which is the backdoor on AMT/ME but content protection for HDCP and the software extensions like identity protection, SGX.

AMD and Nvidia have always implemented DRM support in their respective GPUs and APUs come to think of it, maybe AMD delayed Vega in part because of this, along with enterprise scaling

>>59255984
5820k doesn't have SGX

File: 1173333854353.jpg (32KB, 300x289px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 300x289px

I just compared on PCPartPicker between the 8 core CPU's for shits and giggles.

AMD:
AMD RYZEN 7 1800X 3.6GHz 8 Core 95W $498.99
AMD RYZEN 7 1700X 3.4GHz 8 Core 95W $399.99 AMD RYZEN 7 1700 3.0GHz 8 Core 65W $328.99
Averages: 8 Core 3.4GHz 95W $400

Intel:
Intel Core i7-6900K 3.2GHz 8 Core 140W $1021.99
Intel Core i7-5960X 3.0GHz 8 Core 140W $1014.89
Averages: 8 Core 3.2GHz 140W $1000

Averages: 8 Core 3.4GHz 95W $400
vs
Averages: 8 Core 3.2GHz 140W $1000

Any fucking way you look at it, AMD is much more profitable, and by the looks of that power output Intel is this year's house arsonist.

The only question is how well software developers will code and develop for AMD CPU's to actually utilize their base performance, something Intel is way ahead of AMD in.

I'd still pick the AMD option. Gaymes don't rely on CPU's as much as GPU's these days,
and as for the pro work, i don't do that shit so it's the same for me between using Intel or AMD.

>>59256067

That's the point, "not getting ryzen and waiting for skylake" is counter-intuitive since you can very well mitigate the best of both worlds on a scaled timeline implying you have a usage for it.

Not buying Ryzen at that price point is counter-intuitive given the cost difference, one chip costs more than the entire build from PSU to cables and you'd still have leeway

File: 1371072711284.png (280KB, 752x548px) Image search: [Google]

280KB, 752x548px

DON'T BUY RYZEN YET GOYIM
WAIT FOR OUR NEWER, BETTER PROCESSOR
PLEASE
WE REALLY NEED YOUR SHECK.. FIDELITY

>>59256067
>Gaymes don't rely on CPU's as much as GPU's these days
If gaming today is your primary concern, you don't have to rely on Intel's HEDT, which is obscenely overpriced. The 7700K costs less and gets better performance than anything in the r7 lineup.

File: 1487816406625.png (1MB, 3823x1687px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3823x1687px

>>59256128

> one chip costs more than the entire build from PSU to cables and you'd still have leeway
Pretty much yeah.

>>59255333
Is any online store stocked with 4790ks at a normal price? Seems I'm stuck with either my 4770k with no VT-d, paying >$300 for a years old CPU or upgrading mobo and RAM.

>>59253983
Everyone was shitting themselves back in 2008 that proper multithreading/multicore was "just around the corner," and it has still barely improved since then.

I have a 6-core and would happily upgrade to a much faster 4c/4t.

is it worth getting a fx8350 if I have a fx 6300 now?

is it worth paying $150 for 8350fx or just splurge $300 for zen shit?

File: intelonsuicidewatch.png (408KB, 882x1418px) Image search: [Google]

408KB, 882x1418px

>>59253182
DON'T BUY RYZEN, IT'S BAD FOR GAYMEN

File: 1174220288366.jpg (62KB, 487x650px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 487x650px

>>59257318
>mfw all test-games are piles of shit with shit AI and shit NPC utilization

All these games are fucking shit when it comes to CPU tasks.

Dwarf Fortress, M&B with indicated number of AI engaged in a battle, RTS/RTT and some 4X games, including some few Space Sim where you have shitloads of ship NPC's in 1 sector,
should be the god damn testing norm.

Then we'd actually get some fucking sense between CPU benchmarks.

>>59257401
CPU benchmarks should cover a variety of use-cases, because people don't need to know which CPU is objectively fastest in Space Marine 4000 if they don't fucking play Space Marine 4000.

If you just want to circlejerk over theoretical performance, that's what benchmark suites are for.

>>59255202
kek

>>59253182
>ryzen is still not optamized by windows and shit
>6 core is still 1k

>buy it goy

File: intelfags.jpg (282KB, 752x548px) Image search: [Google]

282KB, 752x548px

>>59256209
Updated version

>>59253184
new socket

AGAIN?

For fuck sake

What if I don't care about Netflix though? Why bother with Intel's new processors when it appears their main function is to show old TV shows again?

Seems like a waste. I'd rather equip my workstation with Zen.

>wait so you can pay more for the same performance

No thanks, I'll just wait for Ryzen ITX boards instead

>>59255460

Its like groundhogs day

Does anybody know how Ryzen would do on emulation?

File: 1485539498405.jpg (1MB, 1480x680px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1480x680px

>>59260677
Probably not that good, it's similar to vidya.

Needs strong single core performance.

>>59260677
theres some dolphin benches floating around with ryzen at the bottom

File: AMD-Ryzen-7-1700X-Dolphin-Benchmark.png (38KB, 650x380px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 650x380px

>>59260677
This isn't the graph I had seen earlier but results are the same

>>59253182
Is Skylake X going to cost $329 for an 8c/16t CPU?

>>59253182
we're doomed either way since you would need games to do 80%+ of their work in parallel to really squish performance out of multicores problem is that games in particular rely a lot on mutable state, this makes multicore programming hard to achieve correctly. what those APIs do is make use of multicore for graphics pre and post computing but it doesn't really help much with the game's logic

>>59255333
we are the champions my fiend

running a 5820k at 4.3ghz 1.23v prime large fft stable on air. i want for nothing. except for a 1080ti to go with my new monitor. i will have it.

Let's wait for Ryzen 2 next year!

>>59253377
>500Ghz and 100+C stable temps.

Would've been nice to heat the house with tho

>>59253574
Indium is expensive as fuck. No one will use it for a semi-conductor

>>59253182
>skylake-x
>112-140watts

into the trash it goes.
And i have a original skylake I'll pass la.

>>59263050
looks like clownpiss still uses a FX-9590

>>59263092
One day

>>59253698
I do!

I host several servers out of my house while simultaneously playing on them. It uses a lot of cores. As a result, Ryzen's got me excited to upgrade my i5-6600k (which I won the silicon lottery on, and OC'd to 4.5GHz, air cooling, 45C)

>>59253963
Seriously? You can get 3gBps speeds on an m.2 ssd. Problem solved, no PCIe.

>>59263109
The 5820K can reach 4.5-.7 stable.

>>59263126
Definitely. This processor is a beast.

>>59263240
Why do you care so much?

>>59263395
What do you host?

>>59263511
A lot of things, mostly servers for me and my friends to play on. Often I like to keep many running at once so I can switch between them without waiting for them to start up. The ones I keep up the most are a webserver, heavily modded minecraft server, and gmod server.

I wish my upload speed wasn't so shit or I could probably start a mini hosting company.

>>59263584
Minecraft and GMod servers won't benefit that much from this upgrade. They're really intensive on single core performances. Modded Minecraft especially, would benefit more from an higher clock speed, than from an additional core, but anyway, I think that it still a good upgrade.

Also, what's your upload speed, and how many people do you serve usually?

>>59263457
>Why do you care so much?

You're right I don't care as sad as that is.

>>59263627
I'm aware of Minecraft and Source's limitations regarding multiple cores, the issue arises when I combine that with another intensive task and I start running out of cores. Plus, everyone is going the way of multi-core with single-threaded performance stagnating ever since intel's gen2.

I usually serve 6-8 people (though I struggle) because of my ISP's shit 4mbps upload cap. We pay for 60/4, and recently (as in, last night) it magically increased to 66/5. Of course, this was after a month straight of my upload getting mysteriously throttled to 0.5mbps, me calling my ISP, them giving me the runaround, and finally this.

I'm really tempted to steal the internet from a nearby school, as my state provides free gigabit internet to all public buildings and they're close enough where I could run a coax from there to my house. Not sure how I'd hide that though.

>>59253428
better than 40% improvements every 6 years

>>59253182
For a 1% performance increase? I'd much rather wait for the R5 series if I want gaming performance.

>>59254805
Fucking kek

>>59263737
New chipset and new architecture.

>not waiting for Cannonlake

>>59264407
>((new chipset)) and "new" architecture.

Stop buying Ryzen and wait.....

OK il just stick to my 9600 FX 270$ laptops.

Over and out 90% consumer.

>>59253182
no fuck you

>FX8320 @ 4.0ghz
>HD7850 2gb

I can run most games at 1080p medium settings. Some games run like complete dogshit though (Guild Wars 2 worst offender).

Would I benefit more from upgrading the processor or graphics card?

Is Ryzen for me? 7700k? 7600k?

Do I wait until 10nm?

Help I am retarded

i already got a 6700k

worth it

>>59253182
go away jew

>>59253182
>AND WAIT FOR
>intelfag
>wait
Hehehehe, looks like your own memes turned against you. Tough luck, pal.

>>59264676
How anon? I have a 2012 MBP with i5-3210 and HD4000 that runs it like butter. How can that setup possibly not max it?

>>59253373
>nm
lmao

File: 124.jpg (73KB, 406x370px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 406x370px

>>59254418
>meanwhile I am using this

File: 2016-06-27 20_18_19-CrystalDiskMark 5.1.2 Shizuku Edition x64.png (453KB, 738x362px) Image search: [Google]

453KB, 738x362px

>>59266725
That's pretty shit, even for an HDD

File: 1434974619040.png (20KB, 183x232px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 183x232px

GOYIM YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND
INTEL IS SUPERIOR TO AMD IN EVERY WAY
DON'T BE FOOLED BY ALL THOSE BIASED BENCHMARKS
INTEL IS STILL THE BEST
I-I SWEAR!

File: 1243.jpg (147KB, 821x374px) Image search: [Google]

147KB, 821x374px

>>59266765
It's ollld as fuck. I have used that HDD for like 10 years maybe?
I did get a cheap TB HDD about 4-5 years ago though.

>>59253182
>make skylake rig
>plan on upgrading when extreme editions come out
>just gonna swap cpu out, maybe sell the i7
>new socket
>cant upgrade a $1.5k rig
>mfw
shoulda bought amd. dont even give a shit about performance anymore, its the principal of the matter.

>>59254418
I agree with you.
Sitting on an 950 pro here.

Instead of a 512GB 950 pro, I should have bought a 1 TB SSD.

>>59267461
I got a 250GB 950Pro and a 500GB SSD for the same price of a 500GB 950 Pro.

Tell me one reason why I should get a $2000 CPU thats barely 5-10% better than the $330 Ryzen?

>>59267742
The 5820k I bought was $280 at microcenter.

It's X299 counter-part will likely be ~$100-150 more at launch, but i'd expect similar sales at microcenter within a few months.

>>59266769

>It's fake benchmarks!

File: 2017-03-06.png (126KB, 514x428px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 514x428px

>>59253643
That image is too white you racist, Intel is diverse(TM)

>>59264570
That was rude

>>59265816
>Intelfag

Actually, I prefer AMD over Intel

>>59265865
what

There is no reason to upgrade until 8 cores become standard for Intel

t. x5470 owner

>>59266769
No. I hate Intel, but these Ryzen CPUs... Meh.

>>59267313
good post

>>59267833
Delet this