4K / UHD laptops

>>59252370
No. I'd much prefer a 1440p laptop desu.

File: furries.jpg (70KB, 774x1032px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 774x1032px

>>59252370
Don't fall for the 4K jew meme, broskie.

What are you going to be using a 4k UHF laptop for?

Any laptop with a decent battery life is equipped with one of those Intel ULV processors. The laptop tends to lag when browsing the Internet if your browser is in full screen mode except for the Microsoft Edge browser.

>>59252586
Will there be a point in time where 4K laptops are the norm without having to sacrifice performance to allow the laptop to run on battery longer than an hour?

I wish I could travel forward in time 6 years just to have awesome standards in technology.

>>59252370
I've had mine for two years now. Of course they are. How is this even a question? I keep it plugged in all the time, so i can't say anything about battery life, but I've never had a laptop with a long battery life.

No. It's not worth the lost battery life and lower performance. They also usually have extreme glare.