You ARE using a Core 2 Duo..r-right anon?

No, using a X2 4600+

File: scrot.png (2MB, 1400x1050px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1400x1050px

yep

File: Clipboard01.jpg (5KB, 572x35px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 572x35px

>>59246111
yes, still more than enough for me

What is that?

>>59246111
ofc, still using an E7200

>>59246111
Nah mate. I'm using a 6th gen core i5.

Amiga 1200.

File: 1832TCh1102n18[1].png (12KB, 422x389px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 422x389px

>>59246111
why not 4 at the same time?

Core 2 Quad

Q9550 stronk
>using dual core in 2017

is a mobile core2duo really enough anons? I'm not sure if I should get a cheap ass x200 for a shitposting machine

File: neofetch-2017-03-05-04-01-44-8286.png (348KB, 1280x800px) Image search: [Google]

348KB, 1280x800px

Comfy shitposting machine coming thru.

Nah man fx 8350. Waiting on my 1800x at the moment

>>59246714
My man

>>59247512
BUTTT GOYYYYYYIMMMMM THATS NOT INTEL
REEEEEEEEE

L G A 7 7 5
G
A
7
7
5

File: speccy.jpg (94KB, 674x532px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 674x532px

This thing is about 8 years old. Being poorfag is suffering.

No, I'm using a Core i7 6700HQ, with a maximum clock speed of 3.5 GHz. Why would I let an obsolete dual core CPU in my laptop?

>>59247460
I got myself a used T420 for $150 in near perfect condition.

Which brings the question: why in the fuck do some people keep running such obsolete hardware? If you can't afford to spend 150 bucks on a decent shitposting machine, just quit shitposting and go sort out your life first.

File: implyingapplegoodformedia.jpg (1MB, 1800x1200px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1800x1200px

11 year old Macbook Pro. I think it's a T7400.

>>59247914
That's right. It's better.

Intel is finished and bankrupt.

>>59247346
>Energy consumption intensifies

>>59247974
That's actually decent hardware today still. Damn how much did that cost 8 years ago?

>>59246111

4790K / 4870HQ Haslels still going strong.

My surface also has an Intel Core i7-4650U dual core, but:

>current year
>2 cores

>>59248003
in 2008 I got a 1mb pentium dualcore e2200 for <$35
oc'd on stock cooler with auto voltage to 3ghz
plus craptastic $25 mobo
old ram sticks, psu, hard drive and case

intel cpus the past 8 years have been horrible value

there was always superb value added to amd and intel cpus if you were willing to tinker just a bit, bsel mods, overlocking etc.
not now

>>59246111
A few weeks ago I used a Core 2 QUAD.

X5460 here, which is essentially a Q9560 with a higher clock speed.

File: speccy mrk2.png (38KB, 606x591px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 606x591px

Kinda.

File: speccy.png (47KB, 680x533px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 680x533px

lol no fuck off mate

>>59246111

I did until last year when I got a second hand i5-2400 with mobo and some RAM for cheap.

That E8500 could run a lot of games with a subtile overclock. Ran a bit hot because of that, though.

>>59246111
I'm not a complete fucking poorfag. Why the fuck would I be using a nearly decade old arch?

I was, but now i have an i7 4790

>>59247335
...4? No, first of all that's only two listings. Second of all it's one for each core.

>>59248336
I used to have an atom N270 in a netbook. Same clock speed, single core. That shit could barely run YouTube back in 2009.

>>59248109
>FX

get ryzen, FX a shit

>>59249027
Got two other nettops with atom 230 and 330 respectively. It's ok, just finding DDR2 LAPTOP ram is hard

Anyone else Core II EXTREME here?

Yes

% sysctl machdep.cpu.brand_string
machdep.cpu.brand_string: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU     E8335  @ 2.66GHz

>>59247991
Alright, I'll get an x220 then

>>59246111
Don't even know what it is.

File: 1479410579354.png (228KB, 358x408px) Image search: [Google]

228KB, 358x408px

>>59247499
Why would you run Ubuntu on a Mac?

>>59251464
because OS X runs like shit

>>59248498
Its more than enough for most tasks and upgrading for the sake of it its retarded.

t. i5 3470 gaymen

>>59246111
Yes, on my based T60

File: Screen Shot 2017-03-05 at 11.10.38 AM.png (9KB, 178x14px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 178x14px

>>59246111

File: yeet.png (35KB, 653x468px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 653x468px

>>59246111
Yes

>>59246111
Actually yeah..

>>59246729
>>59247132
>>59247368
>>59247499
>>59247974
>>59251683
>>59251906
How are you enjoying your dog-slow internet experience?

>>59251978
How are you enjoying trying to justify wasting your money on needless upgrades?

File: 20894.jpg (28KB, 400x294px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 400x294px

There's basicaly nothing you can do casually on an i5 you can't on a Core 2. Spent $40 on pic related

>>59252029
>needless

kek, not him but sandybridge laptop + phenom desktop here.

Worth it.

File: 1487793432432.png (335KB, 688x720px) Image search: [Google]

335KB, 688x720px

>>59246111
Yes, it's true. If all you use your PC for is shitposting and masturbating to chinese cartoons, an upgrade hasn't been required for 10 years now (maybe an SSD). Congratulations on saving money and not buying upgrades when you don't need it.

>>59246111
i5 2500k

>>59246111
I love my core2, got it at a thrift store just wish I could install more than 4gb ram :(

>>59247995
i would only buy a powerpc mac

>>59252287
Mah nigga

>>59252240
Ssd and a cheap video card have really kept my core Two going strong

Have fucking sleep hibernate issues under win10 pro but thats the only probs

>>59252293
A GT 730 or 750 ti seems like a good match for it.

>>59246111

>core 2 duo

POOR IN THE LOO

>>59252565
Rich people don't get rich by wasting money on needless things.

File: core2duo.png (10KB, 538x154px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 538x154px

>>59246111
Core 2 Duo master race reporting in.

>>59248094
my dude

>>59252177
>sandybridge
>phenom
2017

File: Clipboard01.jpg (7KB, 640x33px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 640x33px

>>59246111
get on my level

>>59252728
I'm pretty sure my Z3735F netbook is more powerful than that.

>>59252587

>core 2 duo
>rich people

POOR IN THE LOO 2

5+ years old quad core mobile llano cpu here
except for the lack of ISA extensions, I love it

>>59252852
welp, with only 512KB cache everything is more powerful than that

Yep didn't think there would be too many of us

M4ST4R4C3

>>59252858
>>>/v/

>>59247460
Only for shitposting. C2Ds struggle with today browsing, they lack of hw acceleration

>>59249027
I threw out a netbook with that CPU. It was great for the first few years I used it. Then CPU requirements started to go up, and it was pretty much useless after that.

>>59246111
No, I'm using Sandy Bridge-EP.

File: file.png (60KB, 417x413px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 417x413px

>>59246111
sheeeeet

>>59253280
They perfectly play h264 1080p videos with proper graphics driver.

I used a Q6600 up until 2014

Hands down the best value CPU ever released

File: 1470367893365.png (585B, 390x10px) Image search: [Google]

585B, 390x10px

I enjoy this.

>>59246111
My very high end (in its day) Core 2 Duo laptop is unusable because of its pixelated screen. If I could I'd just upgrade the screen to a modern one and keep using it but the jewndustry made it impossible.

>>59247997
lmao surprised amdfags still alive after ryzen

>>59252029
Core 2 Duo's, except for the E8x and fast Penryn models, are obsolete. Trying to load YouTube on an E6300 practically crashes whatever browser I use.

>>59254064
I can load Youtube fine on a comparable Intel Atom CPU. Maybe bad drivers?

>>59247460
I have an x200s and an x230, do yourself a favor and get at least an x220. Mobile core 2 duos are slow as fuck. It can handle 4chan just fine (and 720p youtube) though so if you want a shitposting only machine go ahead.

File: speccy.png (77KB, 655x523px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 655x523px

>>59247974
sup shitbox bro

>>59254064
Nah, C2Ds are fine.

>>59246111
I'm not, but my grandparents are running my old gaming pc which has an e8400 oc'd to 4GHz
they only use it fore emails lel

File: Screenshot_2017-03-05-18-04-20_mh1488747991701.jpg (295KB, 1080x504px) Image search: [Google]

295KB, 1080x504px

>>59246111
Yes.

>>59252161
>There's basicaly nothing you can do casually on an i5 you can't on a Core 2.
Watch 1080p content

File: speccy.png (77KB, 764x594px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 764x594px

2Quad actually.

>>59257706
You are clearly doing something seriously wrong, as others have shown it's entirely possible to do so.

>>59257745
It depends on the quality. I can watch 1080p YouTube videos just fine but I can forget about watching full quality Blu-ray remuxes. It's the only reason I built a new computer.

>>59257805
If you're still using a Core2duo you very likely don't have the disk space for that shit anyway.

>>59257745
Fuck me you're right, I was having choppy playback with this >>59257732 but I think the monitor was the issue.

>>59251525
Ubuntu ain't much better mate.

File: 1462731148472.jpg (68KB, 790x500px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 790x500px

>>59247499
>ayy noobuntu

>>59257877
You'll go back to macOS.
Either you decide to go on a real distro or you'll be back.

>>59257846
Pretty sure 7TB is enough disk space for some remuxes

>core 2 duo
Why not use a core 2 quad so u can be a quadcopter