>dual core i7
http://ark.intel.com/products/95441
>1.3ghz baseclock
>jewtel
pretty embarassing when dual core destroys your octa core
>>59243280
Maybe it'll be used in the comeback of Netbooks.
>>59243280
>TDP: 7W
That's for little mobile shit, amazing we can have Intelâ„¢ i7 on a cellphone now
>>59243349
you have aspergers
>>59243280
There have been dual core i7's almost as long as there have been i7's....
>i7-620M
>>59243280
>3.5W
calm your tits
>>59243593
>>59243349
more like down syndrome
>>59243280
shouldn't they just call it a pentium/i3 at that point? i guess the normies wont eat it up otherwise.
>>59243280
>needing more than 4 threads in a laptop
Why?
What? I thought that the i3 was just two i7 cores.
>>59243280
For laptop is good. I have the i75500u on a lenovo laptod, nice for programming and watch vietnamese cartoons.
>>59243734
It's different with laptop processors
>>59243739
Are you me?
>>59243739
>Laptod
Is that a Todd you can carry around and set on your lap?
>>59243757
lol
>In Intel we trust
>>59243593
I'll sell you my aspergers if you want
>>59243846
I found it in a selftest PDF btw
>>59243280
>VT-x, VT-d
Wow, intel's mobile processors have more virtualization support than ryzen. I'm glad I didn't buy one
>>59243919
But Ryzen supports both those things, you silly Intel shill.
>>59243919
>I didn't buy one
Then how many did you buy?
>>59243938
Cool, so the chipsets are supporting IOMMU?
>>59244018
Of course, AMD's had IOMMU support for years.
>>59244018
>Well, um, hrmm, not yet anon, but just wait. They will when *cough* then you'll see.
I'll just wait for naples. You see, I don't give a shit about the companies. I'll buy whatever is better for my intended use. I want to see AMD get better.
Low-voltage processors are a travesty.
>>59244031
Not ryzen. Sorry.
>>59244055
Source?
>>59244060
Source: me. If that doesn't do it for you wait a few months until it's been out long enough to actually get reviews beyond the usual gamers. Or for a mainboard manufacturer to actually take up the "workstation" idea
>>59244108
I refuse to believe AMD dropped IOMMU after years of support, especially on processors with such high numbers of threads. Crippling their virtualization support seems pretty damned retarded.
>>59244018
>>59244055
>>59244108
Low Energy Shill
Asus and ASRock boards have it, but it's disabled by default.
>>59244108
Ryzen does have IOMMU support, but it currently has a bug, where it only has one IOMMU group.
If it didn't have IOMMU at all, it wouldn't have even a single IOMMU group.
Having one IOMMU group is almost pointless, so I find it hard to believe that this is intended.
>>59244350
>>59244353
Yeah, I said chipsets.
Low energy shill? I don't get it, but...okay.
I was going to buy a ryzen, I still might in the future once they iron out the kinks and realize that they did in fact make a really good cpu. Like I said, I'll wait for naples.
>>59243325
>1.30 ghz boosts to 3.60 ghz
What the fuck
>>59244404
>I'll wait for naples
you building a server?
>>59244589
That's what I planned to use ryzen for initially, hypervisor
>>59244624
Funny, I'm retiring my current FX build to that duty.
>>59243544
I bet a 4core 1.9ghz Ryzen would get 7W TDP as well under Intel's same measurements.
>>59244018
>IOMMU
https://youtu.be/G_6rs9cBzvE?t=14m10s
>>59244448
>What the fuck
Probably runs 1.30 when it's not being charged and 3.60 when it is plugged in to a power source for charging. You don't run the clock running high when you have no power outlet since it'll drain the battery fast.
>>59243544
yea if you want your phone to cause a housefire
>>59245665
My 7500U is 3.1GHz all cores stressed plugged in and 3.0GHz all cores stressed on battery, 3.5GHz single core either way
>>59245846
>7w
>Fire
So you live in a sawmill?