NOOOOO WE WERE SUPPOSED TO BE THE KING

but the human eye only see 30fps

File: average-gaming.png (72KB, 601x830px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 601x830px

>>59242752
And then back in reality

>>59242784
>Using averages including benches done with shitty bugged BIOS versions
k

>>59242774
time isnt real

>>59242784
>6950x has same performance as 5930k
fake benchmarks

File: its_over_schmulke.png (263KB, 745x522px) Image search: [Google]

263KB, 745x522px

>>59242784

File: 1488664232472.png (84KB, 653x726px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 653x726px

>>59242826
D-DELET THIS

>>59242784
>A 6900k is within margain of error of the 7600k
Sure is a good and useful chart you have there that accurately represents what a modern day CPU is capable of

>>59242851
7700k*

http://seekingalpha.com/article/4051541-suerte-de-capote-intels-cannonlake-leaked-patent

Cannonlake might bring something appreciable to market, for enterprise at least. Emphasis on the might.

>>59242818
It's straight from PC Gamer, an average of 14 game benchmarks. Go ahead and read the review and try to tell us how it's fake.

>>59242869
>It's straight from PC Gamer,
straight into the trash it goes.

>>59242907
Hmmmm

>>59242862
Logic die stacking? Sorry Intel, you're still at least half a decade away from that.

>>59243007
Is this the updated computerbase chart?

>>59243014

>top performer gets less than 60fps

What un-optimized trash Fallout 4 is.

AMD: Next time it will be better (tm)

>wait for Vega
>wait for the next -zen iteration
>there's so much room for improvement!

Of course there's always room for lots of improvement when you're shit.

>>59243043
>m-muh optimization

>>59242993
Not necessarily logic stacking, just fabbing logic and uncore separately. Thermal considerations are far less severe.
If their 10nm process is low yielding then the increased complexity of packaging here may have lower financial consequences than trying to fab monologic dies on the new node.

AMD went to advanced MCM, intel went to 3D stacking.

>>59243047

Well, I mean it's true

>>59243059
it's a meaningless buzzword used as a scapegoat every time one CPU is inferior to another tho

>AF x16
>TAA
>the problem is optimization
nope

File: 1486702242436.png (190KB, 631x362px) Image search: [Google]

190KB, 631x362px

>>59243077
g8 b8 m8 I r8 8/8 no h8

>>59243077
TAA is run on the CPU though

>>59243282
>TAA is run on the CPU though
yes, exactly. Cumulatively, these things are extremely taxing, which helps to tease out the clear differences between these chips

>>59243077
Todd, is that you?

>>59242826
That CPU isn't out yet

>>59243077
you sound butthurt, mr. howard

File: 1472005916567.png (2KB, 155x155px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 155x155px

>same 5 shill benches posted in every fucking thread

File: 1413268739866.jpg (143KB, 1067x1600px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 1067x1600px

>>59243392
>expecting any better from /g/
Wow, it's almost like you're on a Mongolian Empire communication system.

>>59242784
>PCGoys

>>59242861
Of course, that is a gaming benchmark, and the 7700k is better because games are optimized for 4 cores. The same reason ryzens aren't performing well in the same games.

>>59243212
gr8*

>>59242784
>7 frames difference between ryzen and 7700K
I can live with it

>>59243392
posting non-approved images doesn't get them any rupees

>>59242784
>average FPS
wut

Ryzen beats in minimum though, and it's still unpatched in windows and games