I fail to see how Ryzen 1700/1800 is bad for gaming. We have

File: 49456404.jpg (38KB, 361x333px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 361x333px

I fail to see how Ryzen 1700/1800 is bad for gaming. We have seen 1080p review from Joker with ultra settings where Ryzen 3.9Ghz was on par with Intel's i7 7700K 5Ghz, using freaking GTX1080, but people said that top of the line GPU is bottlenecking, and it did... But it is exactly a real word example of what people would do. Hell, most of GTX1080 users will probably use higher resolution even where difference in FPS will be literally negligible. Some people will say "but muh future CPU bottleneck will arrive sooner with Ryzen if i purchase a much faster GPU than GTX1080, which wont bottleneck at 1080p anymore, because 720p test shows that the game logic is slower on AMD side!" Lets be real here. What are chances we get something THAT much faster than GTX1080 any time soon? What are chances that you will still play on 1080p resolution with that freaking new GPU? What are chances that AMD wont benefit in the future from so much coars and its new architecture compared to current Intel's lead in non-GPU bottlenecked situations? Pretty fucking slim. "Ryzen is bad for gaming" meme makes no sense to me.