I thought AMD was finished and bankrupt?

File: 800x600 goyim.jpg (148KB, 680x486px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 680x486px

>>59230305
You're on the wrong board
/g/ only plays at 800x600

>>59230305
>7700k
>only 10 frames above an 8350

Holy fuck people still give them money?

>>59230386
those mins tho

>>59230407
It doesn't matter when the game stutters like a mess

File: image_3.jpg (11KB, 240x240px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 240x240px

>>59230305
>mins and maxes higher
>avg lower

Wut...

>>59230363
>800x600

Goy please, only QVGA or lower

It's definitely not as bad as it first seemed when the NDA was lifted. 1080p is starting to get dated for high end hardware users and on higher resolutions with more of a GPU botttleneck ryzen seems to pull ahead, sometimes. The 7700k would be a great buy at 6 cores with incoming games supporting more and more threads.
Intlel turbofancucks just wait for consumer 6cores in 2018 to avoid getting tricked into obsolete 4 cores. Anyone upgrading from sandybridge to babbylake should be shot immediately.

its because dice actually employs decent coders

in 18 months RYZEN gaming benches will be much better when retarded gaymer devs code for 16 threads

>>59230414

Are you color blind?

>>59230468
>Avg: 102 vs 99
>Min: 69 vs 71
>Max: 139 vs 151

Are you color blind

>>59230468

Erm, he's not wrong. Apparantly a small miscalculation by whoever made that graph. Ryzen's highest and lowest are both higher than Intel's, but Intel gets the higher average somehow.

>>59230444
>for high end hardware users and on higher resolutions with more of a GPU botttleneck ryzen seems to pull ahead


lol that is the exact opposite of the findings others have seen

>>59230499
The average is probably taken over all frames, not just the min and max ones.

File: bl0wn.jpg (48KB, 624x468px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 624x468px

>>59230414
You know there is another variable, time.

>>59230414
The minimum framerate just indicates the absolute longest frametime the game experienced at any point during the benchmark, and max framerate the opposite (the shortest frametime). Having a lower average framerate but a higher minimum would mean that the CPU spent more time below the other CPU's average framerate than it did above, but never experienced a frametime that was longer than the other CPU's.

>>59230522
>>59230523

I know how it works, ASSFAGGOTS. I'm just confused as to why it happened.

>>59230538
But there's nothing confusing or particularly odd about it. The most obvious explanation would probably be a very brief moment where the 7700k derped and had an unusually long frametime, causing its' absolute miminum framerate to drop.

>>59230596
probably a particularly egregious cache miss

File: 1471466878906.png (356KB, 525x393px) Image search: [Google]

356KB, 525x393px

>When people bentchmark new CPU / GPU with games you can already run 60+ fps with a dozen of other

Yeah I'm gonna spend money so I can not play these games again because I already played them but now 2-5 more fps

>>59230596
But then why is the max higher.

>>59230305
You fell for the "Intel is better" meme.

>>59230624
if you're not an enthusiast, why even pay attention to enthusiast benchmarks?
some people want to play games at higher framerates than 60, or resolutions higher than 1080p

>>59230386
look at mins
if anything we learned that tech journalism was a mistake with this launch

>>59230411
that's the whole point, max doesn't matter its more rarer than mins
mins>avg>max by stutter importance
and closer mins to avg the better

>>59230305
You realize you just showed a $340 Intel processor getting better average FPS than a $500 Ryzen processor

>>59230932
you realize there is 1Ghz difference?
1 000 Mhz difference. Thousand.

File: intelonsuicidewatch.png (408KB, 882x1418px) Image search: [Google]

408KB, 882x1418px

>>59230932
Oh sorry, here's some benchmarks with the 1700m a $329 CPU

>>59230975
>here are some benchmarks with the 1700, a $329 CPU

>>59230952
Explain why anyone would be stupid enough to buy a Ryzen that costs $160 more to get even worse performance.

>>59230363
Fpbp.

>>59230363
oh lord that image

>>59231091
thing is 1700 gets same results, and is cheaper, so i'd get that
I don't think anyone seriously considers 1800x for gaming, 1700 is fair comparison

>>59230466
Within 3-6 months we'll start seeing some patches to improve things. AMD's already partnered with a few developers to push them.

>>59230656
>enthusiast
that's a funny way to spell goy

File: 1440p.png (224KB, 1274x695px) Image search: [Google]

224KB, 1274x695px

>>59230975

needs the 1440p

>>59231091
It's called "multitasking".
Do your instructions from Intel Aviv not mention that?

>>59230363
Top fucking kek. I wonder if I will get banned on Reddit for posting this image.

File: streaming-obs.png (129KB, 1440x1080px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 1440x1080px

>>59231670
Multi-tasking, you mean like streaming while playing a game?

Oh wait...

File: average-gaming.png (72KB, 601x830px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 601x830px

>>59231173
1700 doesn't even get close to the same results

1700 is the worst performer in Ryzen's whole line up

>>59232392

Why people never post source?
its not i'm against your chart but how the fuck I can do my own research?
Holy fuck you people are retarded.

>>59232419
Look in bottom right corner

>>59230466
>dice actually employs decent coders
>he didn't play bf4 on launch

>>59232515
bf4 is still broken. Idk if it's origin, my pc, or bf4 but it half works and only half the time.

>>59232503

Okay, I just google it myself before you post that
>While I wasn't able to capture the number of dropped frames from the stream, I was able to capture the FPS numbers from Dota 2. All the eight-core CPUs did well, but the 7700K took a significant hit to performance by as much as 18FPS with OBS active. Ryzen did well, only dropping 3FPS while streaming, but was ultimately slower overall than the Intel systems.

The only that part said anything about the OBS setting is
>That's particularly true in the OBS/Dota 2 benchmark, where the game was software-encoded at 3500Kbps and streamed
It doesn't said anything about the preset setting, So I guess they are at default "very fast", even a shitty i5 can do this.
But Very Fast is shit for high pace game like FPS, it will create a lot artifacts, Dota 2 too if the camera moved around too fast.

Its not I'm trying to diss intel here, but I do works as video mixer in live streaming Esport event.
If you want to get better quality you need to changed your preset, but it will used more CPU power for better quality.

So if anyone can find me an OBS benchmark of ryzen running at better preset It would be helpful instead of some random reviewer who known nothing about encoding in streaming.

>>59232581

Also I saw in that same site 1800x top everything in Handbrake benchmark.

So it keep raised my suspicion that this guy know nothing about how to properly setting an OBS.

>>59232392
>OBS not scaling with core count
if anything, this is more indicative of OBS being a piece of shit