Apple chooses AMD

>>59230232

nice source bro

>>59230232
>>59230254
INTEL BTFO

File: 1487596320749.jpg (53KB, 786x618px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 786x618px

Hackintosh?

Look at that, noncompetitive faggots stick together.

>>59230310
>non competitive
>makes more money that you in infinite lives

File: 1487186495608.png (261KB, 1039x559px) Image search: [Google]

261KB, 1039x559px

>>59230300
more like crapintosh

File: 1486001870140.png (267KB, 785x757px) Image search: [Google]

267KB, 785x757px

>>59230324
dun sey det

>>59230323
There's a difference between having one of the best marketing departments in the business and actually making a worthwhile product. AMD has had that in common with Apple for the last few months.

>>59230232
>Zen-based Opterons

This hasn't even been confirmed. Yes, there will be server chips. But they might not be named Opteron.

>>59230408
>muh marketing maymay
xD!

>>59230324
why is he eating silica gel

>>59230232
AMD don't had TB3

>>59230899
It doesn't matter since not even Macfags were dumb enough to pay Thunderbolt tax.

>>59230460
I hope they will be. It's one of the names AMD uses that I like

>>59230254
A FUCKING TRASHCAN

>>59230232
But more importantly, who cares?

>>59230899
Thunderbolt is not a CPU feature. It's an addon chip. Apple can buy a CPU from AMD and a thunderbolt chip from Intel.

>>59231060

it would actually be a big deal cause that would mean that you can turn any AMD system easily into a hackintosh .. you can try today but its harder than Intel cause Apple used Intel so far

>>59230232
makes sense the ryzen 1800x is the best CPU price-to-performance for the pro market.

>>59230232
>upcoming Mac Pro
I want to believe

>so long as it's not another trash can

>>59231506
I just hope they don't remove all ports and only include wifi and bluetooth.

>>59230300
you can already use some amd processors for hackintosh, but it's a lot more work. who knows if it will work with ryzen though.

>>59230575
Because he's stupid and just eating sand