Shut the fuck up about how the 1800X is a little behind Intel

Another moron that doesn't understand cpu benchmarks.

>>59228895
>i5 faster than i7
intel fags on suicide watch

>>59229027
Must be a HT issue.

>>59228895
just check how xeons progressed for games
same thing will happen here
so waitfag argument of advancing gpus is mute

>>59228895
>3fps less than a 6950K which costs 3x as much

INTEL ON SUICIDE WATCH

>>59228895
No one cares about those frame rates we just care that its slower in 90% of the shit done on a PC for much more money

File: 1700_vs_7700k.png (441KB, 1670x1250px) Image search: [Google]

441KB, 1670x1250px

>>59229229
What?

It destroys Intel in everything outside of games. The 1700x has comparable performance to a 6900K and it's 1/3rd of the price.

>>59228895
Are you dumb?

The 7600k that beats it is $240 fucking dollars

The 1800X is $500

Literally no reason to buy the 1800x, it's horrible

File: ryzen-photoshop.png (112KB, 722x554px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 722x554px

>>59229282
>It destroys Intel in everything outside of games.

No it doesn't, it's horrible at nearly everything

>>59229887
It actually does not beat it overall, anymore than it beats the 1000 doller 6900k.

It's just better at ONE thing, games.

>>59229894
Adobe is shit at multithread.

Keep cherry picking benches

File: cosby2.jpg (13KB, 254x300px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 254x300px

>>59229282

Anything single threaded is completely blown away but 7700. And even shit like adobe premiere we see the 7700 keeping pace with the 6950X only being 21% slow on exporting and in some things it performs faster.

I'll take the all around good chip, the one that plays games, runs photoshop and lightroom and can do video just fine. If shaving a few seconds here and there off specialized multi-threaded applications is worth being slower all around then be my guess.

>>59229922
7600k

File: premiere_prev_render7700.jpg (86KB, 650x448px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 650x448px

>>59229903
>ONE thing

oh here look at that, the 7700 trading blows with the 6850....

>>59229922
7600k is incredible for the price, go for it

File: premiere_warp7700.jpg (79KB, 650x448px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 650x448px

>>59229912
oh look at that, the 7700k exceeding all the big bad intel processors... and at substantially cheaper than the 1800x

oh my

>>59229969
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gUNAvkY6Ops

File: overall7700vs6950x.png (11KB, 852x260px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 852x260px

>>59229912
Oh no look at that. 7700k showcasing an amazing price/perf ratio

AND it plays games

but yeah ya know, those cinebench scores. i know at my job those are very important so i feel ya

>>59229997
>>59229980


inb4 its not the chip thats wrong. its the devs of industry standard software that are wrong!

>>59230001
see:

>>59229997

your literally paying extra for nothing

>>59230001
If price doesn't matter get a 7700k, it's very versatile and very fast

>>59230017
>your literally paying extra for nothing


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4sx1kLGVAF0&t

yup, there is no need to change from sandy anytime soon

Ryzen is pointless because you can get latest intel for almost 100$ less in every parts of Europe. 1700 ryzen is almost 100$ more expensive than i7 7700k

>>59229980
lol nice cherry picking, shill

>>59229980
>>59229997
>more adobe shit
>then your bench goes on to say it does not match the high end i7s the current ryzen matches

*yawn*

Shill better or not at all

>>59230164
sucks when reality doesnt line up with desire doesn't it?

if spending needless money for a type of kit that wont be ready for the prime time for another several iterations is what keeps you going, then by all means go for it. just don't try to mislead people who can't do their own research.

>>59229202
you're paying 3 times as much for those extra 3 frames, stupid goyim.

>>59230205
Pretty much.

Buying a 1000 dollar 8c16t i7 is truly a waste when ryzen exists.

>>59230242

buying a $520 ryzen cpu is truly a waste when 7700k and cuda exists.

>>59230286
>all multithreaded tasks are handled by the gpu

A true insight into the mind of a Intel shill. Little does he realize by invalidating ryzen he invalidates his own line of 8c16t cpus

>>59230286

Buying a 7700k is a waste for gaming. Can you agree with that?

File: teethsoyellow.png (874KB, 1463x1365px) Image search: [Google]

874KB, 1463x1365px

> on premier video editing

https://www.pugetsystems.com/labs/articles/Premiere-Pro-2017-Intel-Core-i7-7700K-i5-7600K-Performance-884/

> how would the 7700k compare against the 6800k? for me it would be important to know, since it'd determine or at least narrow down my choices of motherboards.

>The 6800K is just a slower (lower clock speed) version of the 6850K we tested, and while it also has fewer PCI-E lanes that won't directly impact video editing performance. The clock speed difference will bring it closer to the 7700K in a lot of situations where the 6850K is only 5-10% faster now, especially when working with common 1080P footage types. The 6800K would still be a little faster than the 7700K when dealing with more complex codecs or higher resolutions, but at the same time it will fall further behind the 7700K in situations where that was already faster than the higher core count processors - like Warp Stabilize.

AMD chasing that 6800 while intel already had a better performing part for sale. top kek

Anyway, considering the rumored price points of the Ryzen 5 series (highest would be $260 I think), would those be the CPUs to watch for?

>>59228895
>but 7700k can do 5-10fps more than 1700
>160 vs 170
yeah people are retarded

File: 1440p.png (224KB, 1274x695px) Image search: [Google]

224KB, 1274x695px

>>59229894

at least use benchmarks with the fixed bios bruh.

it beats or comes close to the 7700k in most everything. and beats the 6900k.

>>59229027
I5 is more adapted to games

File: average-gaming.png (72KB, 601x830px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 601x830px

>>59231376
Uhh this benchmark literally has the updated BIOS, read PC gamer's review

Ryzen is truly horrible

>>59230308
It's not in the least bit, see >>59231904

Literally the best gaming CPU at an incredible price

Can we stop relying on Avg fps only and gimme 1% and 0.1% Low because AMD RYZEN will be ON SUICIDE WATCH

>>59229894
>it's horrible at nearly everything
It bit like you anon