Don't worry guys, this time we'll beat Intel. For realsies!

File: 1487822903630.gif (289KB, 400x300px) Image search: [Google]

289KB, 400x300px

>>59225534
GET READY TO GET BTFO INTELFAGS

File: delet2.jpg (14KB, 400x225px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 400x225px

MUH INTEL!!!!!

AMD loyalists love living in the delusion that the next release will be the one that bankrupts Intel.

>>59225534

>Waitfags

>>59225723
>Value oriented consumers

AMD's 8c16t processors absolutely rape Intel's 8c16t. Why would AND's 4c8t not absolutely rape Intel's 4c8t?

>>59225534
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vb3IMTJjzfo

>>59225571
R7 made the entire X99 platform redundant, and that was it's job. R5 is equivalent to the consumer i7 and i5 series. Why do you think Intel will do a better job defending LGA1151 compared to 2011-3?

>>59225759
Ryzen IPC is 6.8% behind Kaby Lake
Ryzen Clocks lower than Kaby Lake
Ryzen will not beat a Kaby Lake i7 in raw performance.

I'd love to see it come close, at a much lower price.

>>59225801

w-w-wait for k-kaby lake!!!

>>59225848
?

>>59225801
I'll be honest, that r7 1700 is looking really appealing with how computers are beginning to take advantage of moar cores.

Also
>r7 1700 oc to 4ghz
>32GB RAM
>dual gtx 1070
Split it into 3 virtual machines.
2c 4t per pc, like an i3, with 8GB ram.
And congratulations, you can now have a 4 way lan party that can run most games 1080p medium-high with your friends. All for the price of your typical i7 computer.

Let's wait for the OS internal patches.

File: 1487012051603.jpg (51KB, 333x293px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 333x293px

>>59226272
>Implying that people here has more than one friend

kek

>>59225801
Ryzen clocks higher than the latest Intel 8c
We don't know if a 8c Kaby Lake would clock equally well, it probably wouldn't since Kaby Lake power targets are lower than Broadwell and Skylake

>>59226381
Do you not?

>clock speeds are lower than the 1800X which sucks
no thanks

>>59226272
that would be nice in theory but in reality iommu groups fuck this up.

>r7 > intel HEDT in multicore performance/$
>naples > intel server chips in performance/watt

It doesn't matter if the R5 chips are still worse than Intel in video gayming. HEDT+enterprise will at least give AMD a market foothold.

File: ryzen fallout 4 1080p ultra benchmark.png (247KB, 665x1520px) Image search: [Google]

247KB, 665x1520px

>>59226272
>2c 4t per pc, like an i3
right.. about that..

File: gaming cpu performance pentium wins.png (54KB, 450x887px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 450x887px

>>59225801
>>59226272
>>59226526

>>59226272
>And congratulations, you can now have a 4 way lan party that can run most games 1080p medium-high with your friends. All for the price of your typical i7 computer.
>R7 1700 can't even compete with pentium/i3 in many games
>thinks he's going to get 4x hardware accelerated virtual machines out of it for the purpose of gaming
this delusion tho

>>59226272
>all for the price of your typical i7 computer
+1 gtx 1070 though

>>59226530
>faster than an ivy Bridge i7
Cool, so it'll be as fast as an i3 3220 per virtual machine.
That's some decent performance right there.

>>59225534
There's so much spillover from /v/ on this board

Fuck off with your graphics cards threads fucking holy shit we have like 20 graphics cards threads every day. There should at least be a graphics cards general or something

This sucks, I was expecting AMD to be competitive with Intel. Guess I'll just have to keep waiting.

File: Dummy15.jpg (6KB, 259x194px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 259x194px

>>59226272
what makes you think you can split two GPUs between 3 VMs?

>>59226734
3 VMs and one desktop*
And idk, Just a random thought.

If not though then why not just 4 rx 470s or gtx 1050 TIs?

File: 1336782310593.gif (932KB, 253x197px) Image search: [Google]

932KB, 253x197px

>Wait for Zen
>Ok, then when is zen out?
>Not Zen, now it's Ryzen, wait for Ryzen
>Ok...when is Ryzen out?
>It's out now
>Ok, but should i get it
>No, not that Ryzen, wait for those other Ryzen.
>....

What's next?

>>59226784
Only 16 PCIe 3.0 lanes for GPU
You'd need some insane motherboard that sends the 4x M.2 lanes to a 16x slot, and has one more slot from the PCIe 2.0 lanes out of the chipset.

X370, is not for platforms like that.
X99 is still the king of I/O expandability.

File: perfrel_1920.gif (47KB, 400x649px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 400x649px

>>59226828
4x pcie 3.0 will be fine, you'll get like 95% performance from the gpu worst case scenario.

>>59226608
We had one but cancer isn't easy to contain

>>59226986
The point is, you'd need a fucking crazy motherboard to do it.

>>59227027
True. Just realised you meant 4 gpu slots and not just the amount of lanes available.

Just out of curiosity, would a couple of 1070s work across 4 desktops?

>>59227049
You need 1 GPU per virtual machine.

>>59225787
Every benchmark against x99 was using dual channel ram as apposed to the quad channel x99 was designed for

>>59225534
Fucking scam artists go from one failed launch to the next, ripping off more and more people

I am so done with AMD

>>59227399
Wouldn't ryzen still be better than similar priced Intel parts for certain applications though?